基于高维拉曼光谱数据的变压器油纸绝缘老化评估方法研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)05-1463-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4243 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Laser Raman spectroscopy is an effective method for detecting the aging state of transformer oil-paper insulation. With the expansion of sample quantity and the gradual increase of data set dimension, it is of great significance to study the evaluation method of oil-paper insulation aging in transformer suitable for high-dimensional Raman spectral data. An oil-paper insulation environment similar to the internal insulation structure of the field transformer was designed, and the accelerated thermal aging experiment was carried out and regularly sampled to obtain ten types of oil samples with increasing aging degrees, then these samples were detected using laser Raman spectroscopy. The compound sparse derivative modeling method was used to preprocess the original Raman spectral data, which can complete the noise elimination and baseline correction in one step. The differential feature selection method was introduced to screen the spectral features with significant changes under different aging degrees, and the variance of the feature point data set with different aging degrees was calculated under the same Raman shift. Furthermore, the Raman feature variable corresponding to the data sequence with a large difference was selected, and the variance threshold was set to 0.5 for feature selection, each sample selected 304 from 1 023 spectral feature points for subsequent analysis. In this paper, many different types of algorithms were introduced to process the high-dimensional sample data set of transformer oil-paper insulation aging Raman spectra. For instance, the K-means clustering algorithm, the Fisher algorithm and Random Forest algorithm were used to establish a model with the preprocessed data of the obtained samples. The evaluation accuracy，lifting degree and Kappa coefficient were introduced to evaluate the discriminant effect of each mathematical model. The results show that supervised learning Fisher algorithm and Random Forest algorithm have a better effect and discriminatory advantage compared with the unsupervised learning k-means clustering algorithm because the discrimination ability of the model is improved by 1.166 6 and 1.95, respectively; Judging from the discrimination accuracy and Kappa coefficient, the discriminant model established by the strong classifier Random Forest algorithm is better than the Fisher discriminant model, for its accuracy is improved by 10%, and the Kappa coefficient is increased by 0.111 5. Compared with a single classifier, a strong classifier composed of multiple single classifiers has better generalization evaluating of transformer oil-paper insulation aging, and the model is more stable and reliable. By comparing three different types of algorithms, the discrimination advantages of the supervised learning strong classifier Random Forest algorithm in evaluating transformer oil-paper insulation aging are determined, which lays the foundation for the effective evaluation of transformer oil-paper insulation aging.

Key words：Transformers；Oil-paper insulation；Raman spectroscopy；High dimensional data set；Aging assessment

Received: 2020-06-05 Accepted: 2020-09-26

ZTFLH:

O657.37

Corresponding Authors: CHEN Shu-ting E-mail: 490210758@qq.com

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)05-1463-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2021/V41/I05/1463

[1] ZOU Jing-xin, CHEN Wei-gen, WAN Fu, et al（邹经鑫, 陈伟根, 万福, 等）. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society（电工技术学报）, 2018, 33(5): 1133.
[2] ZENG Zi-lin, ZHANG Hong-jun, ZHANG Rui, et al（曾子林, 张宏军, 张睿, 等）. Control and Decision（控制与决策）, 2014, 29(6): 961.
[3] CHEN Xin-gang, YANG Ding-kun, TAN Hao, et al（陈新岗, 杨定坤, 谭昊, 等）. High Voltage Engineering（高电压技术）, 2017, 43(7): 2256.
[4] CHEN Xin-gang, LI Chang-xin, FENG Yu-xuan, et al（陈新岗, 李昌鑫, 冯煜轩, 等）. High Voltage Apparatus（高压电器）, 2018, 54(9): 117.
[5] ZHANG Tao-tao, HU Ya-nan, LI Yang, et al（张陶陶, 胡亚南, 李杨, 等）. Statistics and Decision（统计与决策）, 2017，(4): 18.
[6] LIU Qing-zhen, ZHANG Xiao-yan, CAI Jin-ding（刘庆珍, 张晓燕, 蔡金锭）. Power System Protection and Control（电力系统保护与控制）, 2019, 47(8): 62.
[7] FAN Zhou, CHEN Wei-gen, WAN Fu, et al（范舟, 陈伟根, 万福, 等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2018, 38(10): 3117.
[8] FANG Kuang-nan, WU Jian-bin, ZHU Jian-ping, et al（方匡南, 吴见彬, 朱建平, 等）. Statistics & Information Forum（统计与信息论坛）, 2011, 26(3): 32.
[9] LI Guo, JIANG Xiao-dong（李国, 江晓东）. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA（电力系统及其自动化学报）, 2018, 30(11): 70.
[10] Banfield R E, Hall L O, Bowyer K W, et al. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2007, 29(1): 173.
[11] Ning Xiaoran, Ivan Selesnick, Laurent Duval. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Elsevier, 2014, 139：156.
[12] Rodriguez-Galiano V F, Luque-Espinar J A, Chica-Olmo M, et al. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 624: 661.
[13] CHEN Wei-gen, WAN Fu, GU Zhao-liang, et al（陈伟根, 万福, 顾朝亮, 等）. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society（电工技术学报）, 2016, 31(2): 236.
[14] CHEN Wei-gen, ZHAO Li-zhi, PENG Shang-yi, et al（陈伟根, 赵立志, 彭尚怡, 等）. Proceedings of the CSEE（中国电机工程学报）, 2014, 34(15): 2485.
[15] Asha Kiranmai S, Jaya Laxmi A. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2018, 3: 29.