|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Application of On-Line Analysis of CO2 and H2S in Natural Gas Feed Gas by Laser Raman Spectroscopy |
ZHU Hua-dong1, 2, 3, ZHANG Si-qi1, 2, 3, TANG Chun-jie1, 2, 3 |
1. Research Institute of Natural Gas Technology, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company,Chengdu 610213, China
2. Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Quality and Energy Measurement for State Market Regulation, Chengdu 610213, China
3. Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Quality and Energy Measurement, CNPC, Chengdu 610213, China
|
|
|
Abstract To address the lack of online analysis for CO2 and H2S in the purification of raw natural gas, a cutting-edge laser Raman analyzer and accompanying pre-treatment device have been developed. These advancements aim to tackle the highly corrosive properties of raw natural gas, including water content, oil pollution, particulate matter impurities, high sulfur content, and carbon dioxide. Additionally, a pioneering online analysis method utilizing laser Raman spectroscopy was established. The accuracy and repeatability of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide measurements were thoroughly investigated, confirming the reliability of the online analysis methods. Calibration on these methods was also studied. On-site application experiments were conducted in natural gas purification plants to assess the effectiveness of the developed technology. The method performance testing experiment, demonstrated a deviation of less than 1.0% between the laser Raman test results of hydrogen sulfide and the standard gas indication value, with a relative standard deviation of less than 0.6% across seven measurement results. Similarly, the relative deviation between Raman test results of carbon dioxide and the standard gas indication value was less than 1.0%, with a relative standard deviation of less than 0.76% across seven measurement results. In the application experiments, the relative deviation between on-line Raman spectroscopy and offline iodimetry for H2S test results ranged from 0.3% to 7.5% (with over 90% of the data falling below 3%). In comparison, the relative deviation between on-line Raman spectroscopy and offline gas chromatography for CO2 test results ranged from 0.6% to 8.4% (with over 80% of the data falling below 3%). The calibration cycle was set at 3 days. The online Raman spectrometer operated smoothly and consistently, enabling real-time monitoring of composition dynamics, thus satisfying the on-line analysis needs of natural gas purification plants.
|
Received: 2023-02-13
Accepted: 2023-08-10
|
|
|
[1] State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration, China National Standardization Administration(国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会). Natural Gas: GB 17820—2018(天然气: GB 17820—2018). 2018.
[2] HU Xue-jiao, MO Xiao-bao, QING Shao-xue, et al(胡雪蛟, 莫小宝, 青绍学, 等). Natural Gas Industry(天然气工业), 2015, 35(6): 99.
[3] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, China National Standardization Administration(中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会). Natural Gas Determination of Sulfur Compounds Part 12: Determination of Hydrogen Sulfide Content by Laser Absorption Spectrometry: GB/T 11060.12—2014(天然气 含硫化合物的测定 第12部分:用激光吸收光谱法测定硫化氢含量: GB/T 11060.12—2014). 2014.
[4] Stefan Hanf, Robert Keiner, Di Yan, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(11): 5278.
[5] Stefan Hanf, Timea Boögözi, Robert Keiner, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 87(2): 982.
[6] Torsten Frosch, Robert Keiner, Beate Michalzik, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 85(3): 1295.
[7] Keiner Robert, Frosch Torsten, Hanf Stefan, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 85(18): 8708.
[8] Hanf Stefan, Fischer Sarah, Hartmann Henrik, et al. The Analyst, 2015, 140(13):4473.
[9] Michael Hippler. Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 87(15): 7803.
[10] Petrov, Dmitry V. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(33): 9521.
[11] Li Xiaoyun, Xia Yuxing, Zhan Li, et al. Optics Letters, 2008, 33(18): 2143.
[12] Salter Robert, Chu Johnny, Hippler Michael. The Analyst, 2012, 137(20): 4669.
[13] Sharma Rachit, Poonacha Samhitha, Bekal Anish, et al. Optical Engineering, 2016, 55(10): 1.
[14] Corsetti Stella, McGloin David, Kiefer Johannes. Fuel, 2016, 166: 488.
[15] Petrov Dmitry V, Matrosov van I. Applied Spectroscopy, 2016, 70(10): 1770.
[16] ZHU Hua-dong, LUO Qin, ZHOU Li, et al(朱华东, 罗 勤, 周 理, 等). Natural Gas Industry(天然气工业), 2013, 33(11): 110.
[17] ZHU Hua-dong, SUN Xiao-yan, CHEN Zheng-hua, et al(朱华东, 孙晓艳, 陈正华, 等). Petroleum and Natural Gas Chemical(石油与天然气化工), 2018, 47(1): 94.
[18] GAO Ying, DAI Lian-kui, ZHU Hua-dong, et al(高 颖, 戴连奎, 朱华东, 等). Chinese journal of Analytical Chemistry(分析化学), 2019, 47(1): 67.
[19] National Energy Administration(国家能源局). Analysis of Natural Gas Composition by Laser Raman Spectroscopy: SY/T 7433—2018(天然气的组成分析 激光拉曼光谱法: SY/T 7433—2018). 2018.
[20] State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration, National Standardization Administration(国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会). Rapid Analysis of Shale Gas Components by Laser Raman Spectroscopy: GB/T 39540(页岩气组分快速分析 激光拉曼光谱法: GB/T 39540—2020). 2020.
[21] International Organization for Standardization Central Secretariat. Natural Gas-Upstream Region-Determination of Composition by Laser Raman Spectroscopy-First edition: ISO 23978—2020. 2020.
[22] Hubei Ruiyi Automatic Control System Co., Ltd.(湖北锐意自控系统有限公司). Chinese Patent(中国专利): CN202210783194.1. 2022-10-25.
[23] XIA Jie, SHI Qiang, XU Shao-jun(夏 杰, 施 强, 许绍俊). Logging Engineering(录井工程), 2013, 24(2): 1.
[24] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, China National Standardization Administration(中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会). Natural gas Determination of Sulfur Compounds Part 1: Determination of Hydrogen Sulfide Content by Iodometry: GB/T 11060.1—2010(天然气 含硫化合物的测定 第1部分:用碘量法测定硫化氢含量: GB/T 11060.1—2010). 2010.
[25] State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration, China National Standardization Administration(国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会). Composition Analysis of Natural Gas Gas Chromatography: GB/T 13610—2020(天然气的组成分析 气相色谱法: GB/T 13610—2020). 2020.
|
[1] |
LI Jie, ZHOU Qu*, JIA Lu-fen, CUI Xiao-sen. Comparative Study on Detection Methods of Furfural in Transformer Oil Based on IR and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 125-133. |
[2] |
WANG Fang-yuan1, 2, HAN Sen1, 2, YE Song1, 2, YIN Shan1, 2, LI Shu1, 2, WANG Xin-qiang1, 2*. A DFT Method to Study the Structure and Raman Spectra of Lignin
Monomer and Dimer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 76-81. |
[3] |
XING Hai-bo1, ZHENG Bo-wen1, LI Xin-yue1, HUANG Bo-tao2, XIANG Xiao2, HU Xiao-jun1*. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Channel Sensing Detection of Pyrene in
Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 95-102. |
[4] |
WANG Xin-qiang1, 3, CHU Pei-zhu1, 3, XIONG Wei2, 4, YE Song1, 3, GAN Yong-ying1, 3, ZHANG Wen-tao1, 3, LI Shu1, 3, WANG Fang-yuan1, 3*. Study on Monomer Simulation of Cellulose Raman Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 164-168. |
[5] |
WANG Lan-hua1, 2, CHEN Yi-lin1*, FU Xue-hai1, JIAN Kuo3, YANG Tian-yu1, 2, ZHANG Bo1, 4, HONG Yong1, WANG Wen-feng1. Comparative Study on Maceral Composition and Raman Spectroscopy of Jet From Fushun City, Liaoning Province and Jimsar County, Xinjiang Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 292-300. |
[6] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[7] |
WANG Zhi-qiang1, CHENG Yan-xin1, ZHANG Rui-ting1, MA Lin1, GAO Peng1, LIN Ke1, 2*. Rapid Detection and Analysis of Chinese Liquor Quality by Raman
Spectroscopy Combined With Fluorescence Background[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3770-3774. |
[8] |
LIU Hao-dong1, 2, JIANG Xi-quan1, 2, NIU Hao1, 2, LIU Yu-bo1, LI Hui2, LIU Yuan2, Wei Zhang2, LI Lu-yan1, CHEN Ting1,ZHAO Yan-jie1*,NI Jia-sheng2*. Quantitative Analysis of Ethanol Based on Laser Raman Spectroscopy Normalization Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3820-3825. |
[9] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[10] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[11] |
GUO He-yuanxi1, LI Li-jun1*, FENG Jun1, 2*, LIN Xin1, LI Rui1. A SERS-Aptsensor for Detection of Chloramphenicol Based on DNA Hybridization Indicator and Silver Nanorod Array Chip[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3445-3451. |
[12] |
LIU Jia-ru1, SHEN Gui-yun2, HE Jian-bin2, GUO Hong1*. Research on Materials and Technology of Pingyuan Princess Tomb of Liao Dynasty[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3469-3474. |
[13] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[14] |
ZHAO Ling-yi1, 2, YANG Xi3, WEI Yi4, YANG Rui-qin1, 2*, ZHAO Qian4, ZHANG Hong-wen4, CAI Wei-ping4. SERS Detection and Efficient Identification of Heroin and Its Metabolites Based on Au/SiO2 Composite Nanosphere Array[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3150-3157. |
[15] |
SU Xin-yue1, MA Yan-li2, ZHAI Chen3, LI Yan-lei4, MA Qian-yun1, SUN Jian-feng1, WANG Wen-xiu1*. Research Progress of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Quality and Safety Detection of Liquid Food[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2657-2666. |
|
|
|
|