|
|
|
|
|
|
Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4 |
1. College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment in Mid-Lower Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430070, China
3. China Agriculture (Citrus) Research System, Wuhan 430070, China
4. Citrus Mechanization Research Base, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430070, China
|
|
|
Abstract Prochloraz and imazalil are commonly used preservative fungicides for citrus fruits. The mixture of the two pesticides can effectively reduce pathogenic bacteria' drug resistance and achieve better preservative effects. However, the high concentration of pesticide residues on the surface of fruits and vegetables will affect consumers' health. In this paper, a rapid and accurate method for detecting pesticide residues in the citrus epidermis was established based on the combination of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics methods by taking ugly orange as matrix, prochloraz and imazalil mixed pesticides as the research object. In order to compare the enhancement effects of the gold sol and silver sol, they were respectively used on prochloraz standard solution, imazalil standard solution and mixed pesticide solution of prochloraz and imazalil based on orange peel extract at the concentration of 10 mg·L-1 respectively. Then the Raman spectra of the prepared sample solutions were collected. The results showed that the enhancement effect of gold sol in prochloraz standard solution orimazalil standard solution was better, while silver sol in prochloraz and imazalil mixed pesticides was good. Additionally, to obtain the best reinforcing effect of gold sol substrate, a comparative test was carried out, which determined that the volume ratio of gold sol reinforced substrate to two standard pesticide solutions is 1∶1, and the concentration of agglomerating agent NaCl is 1 mol·L-1. According to the direction from high to low, the spectra of prochloraz standard solutions and imazalil standard solutions at different concentrations were collected. The detection limits were lower than 1 mg·L-1 and 0.5 mol·L-1 respectively, within the maximum pesticide residue limit of 5 mg·L-1 for citrus crops stipulated by the state. In the quantitative analysis experiment of mixed pesticides with prochloraz and imazalil, taking orange epidermis extract as matrix and silver sol with better enhancement effect as enhancement substrate, the surface enhanced Raman spectra of mixed pesticides including prochloraz and imazalil with gradient concentration (5~42 mg·L-1) were collected. Then, various pretreatment methods were used to optimize the spectral data, and four regression models containing support vector regression (SVR), support vector regression optimized by the Grey Wolf (GWO-SVR)algorithm, support vector regression optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO-SVR)and support vector regression optimized by genetic (GA-SVR) algorithm were compared to establish anaccurate and reliable quantitative model. The results showed that the best prediction effect was achieved on the regression model which was established by support vector regression optimized by Grey Wolf (GWO-SVR) algorithm with the characteristic peak intensities of 829 and 1 168 cm-1 as input after the first-order difference preprocessing. The corrected correlation coefficient (RC), the root mean square error (RMSEC) of the correction set, the predicted correlation coefficient (RP), and the root mean square error (RMSEP) of the correction predicted were 0.978, 1.655 mg·L-1, 0.967 and 2.227 mg·L-1 respectively. In conclusion, the proposed method was proved to be effectively applied for the qualitative and quantitative detection of mixed pesticides with prochloraz and imazalil in the citrus epidermis. It could provide a new approach for detecting pesticide residues in citrus.
|
Received: 2022-01-25
Accepted: 2022-11-17
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LONG Chang-jiang
E-mail: lcjflow@163.com
|
|
[1] TIAN Geng-zhi, BAI Xin-ming, LIU Xiao-qing, et al(田耿智, 白新明, 刘晓庆, 等). Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences(核农学报), 2022, 36(2): 402.
[2] Shan C, Ye J, Scarlett A, et al. Journal of Earth Science, 2019, 30:376.
[3] LI Xiao-chun, PANG Yong-feng, SU Ke-zhen, et al(黎小椿, 庞永丰, 苏可珍, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2019, 44(12): 354.
[4] ZHANG Wen-qiang, LI Rong, XU Wen-tao(张文强, 李 容, 许文涛). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (农业工程学报), 2017, 33(24): 269.
[5] LI Jun-xia,MA Li-ya,LIN He-tong, et al(李俊霞, 马丽雅, 林河通, 等). Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences(江苏农业科学), 2021, 49(6): 1.
[6] Hang Zhao,Wuliji Hasi,Nan Li, et al. New Journal of Chemistry, 2019, 43(33): 13075.
[7] Nguyên Hoàng Ly, Thi Ha Nguyen, Ngô Dình Nghi, et al. Sensors, 2019, 19(6): 1355.
[8] Pan Haihui,Ahmad Waqas,Jiao Tianhui, et al. Food Chemistry, 2021, 375: 131681.
[9] Feng Jingyi,Hu Yaxi,Edward Grant, et al. Food Chemistry, 2018, 239: 816.
[10] ZHANG Sha, LIU Mu-hua, CHEN Jin-yin, et al(张 莎, 刘木华, 陈金印, 等). Smart Agriculture(智慧农业), 2021, 3(4): 42.
[11] Fouad K, Alsammarraie, Lin Mengshi. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(3):666.
[12] ZHANG Yan-jun,KANG Cheng-long,LIU Ya-qian, et al(张燕君, 康成龙, 柳雅倩, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(10): 3147.
[13] CHEN Ying,ZHANG Can,XIAO Chun-yan,et al(陈 颖, 张 灿, 肖春艳, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2020, 40(10): 180.
[14] GAN Sheng, LAI Qing-niao, LI Zhi-cheng, et al(甘 盛, 赖青鸟, 李志成, 等). Modern Food Science and Technology(现代食品科技), 2016, 32(1): 52.
[15] LIU Cui-ling, MIAO Yu-qing, SUN Xiao-rong,et al(刘翠玲, 苗雨晴, 孙晓荣, 等). Food Science and Technology(食品科学), 2014, 35(20): 198.
[16] XU Yong-jian, LUO Rong-hui, GUO Mao-tian,et al(许永建, 罗荣辉, 郭茂田, 等). Laser Journal(激光杂志), 2007,(2): 13.
[17] Rodríguez Ortega P G,Casas R,MarchalIngrain A, et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(31):8641.
[18] Mehedi Hassan,M Muhammad Zareef,Jiao Tianhui, et al. Food Chemistry, 2021, 338: 127796.
[19] PENG Yan-kun, TIAN Wen-jian, GUO Qing-hui, et al(彭彦昆, 田文健, 郭庆辉, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2021, 37(14): 310.
|
[1] |
XING Hai-bo1, ZHENG Bo-wen1, LI Xin-yue1, HUANG Bo-tao2, XIANG Xiao2, HU Xiao-jun1*. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Channel Sensing Detection of Pyrene in
Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 95-102. |
[2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[3] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[4] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[5] |
GUO He-yuanxi1, LI Li-jun1*, FENG Jun1, 2*, LIN Xin1, LI Rui1. A SERS-Aptsensor for Detection of Chloramphenicol Based on DNA Hybridization Indicator and Silver Nanorod Array Chip[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3445-3451. |
[6] |
ZHAO Ling-yi1, 2, YANG Xi3, WEI Yi4, YANG Rui-qin1, 2*, ZHAO Qian4, ZHANG Hong-wen4, CAI Wei-ping4. SERS Detection and Efficient Identification of Heroin and Its Metabolites Based on Au/SiO2 Composite Nanosphere Array[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3150-3157. |
[7] |
SU Xin-yue1, MA Yan-li2, ZHAI Chen3, LI Yan-lei4, MA Qian-yun1, SUN Jian-feng1, WANG Wen-xiu1*. Research Progress of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Quality and Safety Detection of Liquid Food[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2657-2666. |
[8] |
CAI Jian-rong1, 2, HUANG Chu-jun1, MA Li-xin1, ZHAI Li-xiang1, GUO Zhi-ming1, 3*. Hand-Held Visible/Near Infrared Nondestructive Detection System for Soluble Solid Content in Mandarin by 1D-CNN Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2792-2798. |
[9] |
ZHAO Yu-wen1, ZHANG Ze-shuai1, ZHU Xiao-ying1, WANG Hai-xia1, 2*, LI Zheng1, 2, LU Hong-wei3, XI Meng3. Application Strategies of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Pathogens[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2012-2018. |
[10] |
CHENG Chang-hong1, XUE Chang-guo1*, XIA De-bin2, TENG Yan-hua1, XIE A-tian1. Preparation of Organic Semiconductor-Silver Nanoparticles Composite Substrate and Its Application in Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2158-2165. |
[11] |
LI Chun-ying1, WANG Hong-yi1, LI Yong-chun1, LI Jing1, CHEN Gao-le2, FAN Yu-xia2*. Application Progress of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for
Detection Veterinary Drug Residues in Animal-Derived Food[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1667-1675. |
[12] |
HUANG Xiao-wei1, ZHANG Ning1, LI Zhi-hua1, SHI Ji-yong1, SUN Yue1, ZHANG Xin-ai1, ZOU Xiao-bo1, 2*. Detection of Carbendazim Residue in Apple Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Labeling Immunoassay[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1478-1484. |
[13] |
LU Yan-hua, XU Min-min, YAO Jian-lin*. Preparation and Photoelectrocatalytic Properties Study of TiO2-Ag
Nanocomposites[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1112-1116. |
[14] |
WANG Yi-tao1, WU Cheng-zhao1, HU Dong1, SUN Tong1, 2*. Research Progress of Plasticizer Detection Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1298-1305. |
[15] |
LI Wei1, 2, HE Yao1, 2, LIN Dong-yue2, DONG Rong-lu2*, YANG Liang-bao2*. Remove Background Peak of Substrate From SERS Signals of Hair Based on Gaussian Mixture Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 854-860. |
|
|
|
|