基于拉曼光谱的水溶性磷定量分析

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)12-3871-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2690 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Soil phosphorus is one of the most important nutrients for plants. Phosphorus is highly dynamic in soil, and it is not easy to detect it. It has no obvious absorption band in the visible-near infrared range. Therefore, rapid phosphorus detection methods based on other spectral methods are of great significance for developing precision agriculture and/or smart agriculture. Raman spectroscopy has the characteristics of interference-free from water, less sample pretreatment, and complementary to infrared spectral information. Many researchers have tried to use Raman spectroscopy to detect soil phosphorus. However, the weak Raman signal and poor stability restrict its application in soil sensing. To clarify the quantitative relationship between Raman spectra and phosphorus, water-soluble phosphorus (KH₂PO₄) was used as a research target, and the effects of KH₂PO₄ solutions with different phosphorus concentrations on Raman spectra were studied. The raw spectra (RS) were processed by moving average (MA), MA+baseline correction (BL), MA+standard normal variable (SNV), and MA+multivariate scattering correction (MSC). Low concentrations (0.02~5 g·L^-1) and high concentrations (5.21~93.87 g·L^-1) of KH₂PO₄ and their relationships with Raman spectrum variation characteristics were analyzed. A prediction model for phosphorus concentration content was established. The results show that: (1) the coefficient of variation of the spectra in the low concentration range and the high concentration range were significantly different, and the dispersion degree of the spectra in the high concentration range was larger; (2) No obvious Raman peaks were detected in the Raman spectra of the low concentration range. Concentration changes exhibited significant baseline shifts. The coefficient of Determination (R²) of partial least squares regression (PLSR) models was 0.28~0.36; (3) Characteristic Raman peaks at 863 and 1 070 cm^-1 were identified in the high concentration range, and PLSR modeling results were R²=0.65~0.7. The MA+SNV and MA+MSC treatments had higher prediction accuracy than the MA alone, indicating that the Raman characteristic peaks of phosphate radicals are the main contributing factors of the model; (4) PLSR modeling using the full concentration range can increase the prediction accuracy (R²=0.73~0.89). The modelling accuracy of using RS was the highest, indicating that the baseline shift has a positive effect on the PLSR results; (5) Through the PLSR regression coefficient, 645, 863, 1 070, 1 412 cm^-1 were selected as characteristic bands to establish a multiple linear regression (MLR) model, and the coefficient of determination R² was close to 1. It shows that the selection of characteristic bands can filter out the interference of background light and extract the effective features of phosphate variation. It can be seen from the above results that it is feasible to detect the content of water-soluble phosphorus by Raman spectroscopy quantitatively. Besides reducing the interference of background light and improving the stability of the Raman signal, a method for selecting characteristic bands is important to improve the repeatability and anti-interference ability of the model for high-resolution detection of Raman spectroscopy.

Key words：Raman spectroscopy; Soil phosphorus; Spectral analysis; Coefficient of variation; Regression coefficient

Received: 2022-07-03 Accepted: 2022-10-12

ZTFLH:

S24

Corresponding Authors: LI Min-zan E-mail: limz@cau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

LI Qi-chen,LI Min-zan,YANG Wei, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)12-3871-06 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2023/V43/I12/3871

[1] DU Zhen-yu，WANG Qing-hua，ZHOU Jian-min, et al(杜振宇，王清华，周健民，等). Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 2012, 49(4): 725.
[2] LI Min-zan，ZHENG Li-hua，AN Xiao-fei, et al(李民赞，郑立华，安晓飞，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2013, 44(3): 73.
[3] Maleki M R, Van Holm L, Ramon H, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2006, 95(3): 425.
[4] FANG Xiang，WANG Wen-cai，JIN Xiu, et al(方向，王文才，金秀，等). Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences(江苏农业学报), 2019, 35(5): 1112.
[5] Li Q, Usui K, Kodaira M, et al. Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery and Food Engineers, 2018, 80(1): 43.
[6] Kodaira M, Shibusawa S. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition (Tokyo), 2020, 66(6): 837.
[7] Theurer L S, Maiwald M, Sumpf B. European Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 72(1): 120.
[8] Xing Z, Du C, Tian K, et al. Talanta, 2016, 158: 262.
[9] Dong T, Xiao S, He Y, et al. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(5): 701.
[10] Maiwald M, Sowoidnich K, Sumpf B. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2022, 53(9): 1560.
[11] Lanfranco A M, Schofield P F, Murphy P J, et al. Mineralogical Magazine, 2003, 67(6): 1299.
[12] Nkebiwe P M, Sowoidnich K, Maiwald M, et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2022, 185(2): 221.
[13] Bogrekci I, Lee W S. 2005 ASAE Annual Meeting (p.1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2005.
[14] Zheng L, Lee W S, Li M, et al. Proc. of SPIE 8527, 2012, 852718. doi: 10.1117/12.977436.
[15] KUANG Xiang-jun(邝向军). COLLEGE PHYSICS(大学物理), 2019, 38(3): 20.
[16] ZHANG Yan-ping，XUE Dong-feng(张艳平，薛冬峰). Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry(应用化学), 2020, 37(7): 823.
[17] Colthup N B, Daly L H, Wiberley S E. Introduction to Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, Third Edition. Academic Press, Inc. 1990, 363.