|
|
|
|
|
|
Identification of Rice From Similar Areas With Different Pretreatment Methods of Raman Spectrum |
WANG Ya-xuan1, TAN Feng2*, XIN Yuan-ming2, LI Huan2, ZHAO Xiao-yu2, LU Bao-xin3 |
1. College of Civil Engineering and Water Conservancy, Helongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China
2. College of Electrical and Information, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China
3. Food College, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China |
|
|
Abstract It is difficult for consumers to distinguish regional rice brands formed by geographical factors instead of rice of similar producing areas. Based on Raman spectroscopy, the experiment compared three common pretreatment methods including first derivative+translational smoothing, second derivative+translational smoothing, wavelet transform+baseline removal. In addition, an improved piecewise polynomial fitting+baseline removal was proposed, and a total of four pretreatment methods respectively were combined with partial least square method to identify rice of similar origin, and an optimal pretreatment method for identifying rice of similar origin was proposed. Firstly, 150 rice spectral samples with a Raman displacement of 200~3 100 cm-1 were collected by Raman spectrometer from three similar producing areas in an county, Heilongjiang province. Then, the original Raman spectra were preprocessed by first derivative + translational smoothing, second derivative+translational smoothing, wavelet transform+baseline removal, and piecewise polynomial fitting + baseline removal. A total of 99 samples were selected from 33 samples from each origin for training, and a partial least square analysis model based on partial least square method was established for the unknown 51 samples. In the training set, the preprocessing method of first derivative+translation smoothing had the maximum correlation coefficient value, the minimum mean square error and the minimum root mean square error. Andwavelet transform+baseline removal hadthe minimum correlation coefficient value, the maximum mean square error and the maximum root mean square error. In the test set, the preprocessing method of 3 points and 2 times fitting+baseline removal had the maximum value of correlation coefficient, the minimum mean square error and the minimum root mean square error, and the preprocessing method of the second derivative+translation smoothing was the worst. Finally, the PLS modeling results showed that, in the training set, the correct discrimination rate of rice from three producing areas was 100% by using four kinds and nine pretreatment methods. In the test set, the total recognition rate of rice from three producing areas was 100% by using 3-point 2-time fitting+baseline removal, and 52.9% by using 5-point 2-time fitting + removing baseline. Other piecewise polynomial fitting was between the two. The total recognition rates of the first derivative + translation smoothing, the second derivative + translation smoothing and the wavelet transform were 88.2%, 86.2% and 96.1%, respectively. It is found that the preprocessing method of 3-point 2-time fitting + removing baseline in piecewise polynomial fitting has obvious advantages and is consistent with the results of the correlation coefficient, mean square error and root mean square error, with high overall recognition rate and stable identification effect.
|
Received: 2019-12-25
Accepted: 2020-04-22
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
TAN Feng
E-mail: tf1972@163.com
|
|
[1] YANG Wan-jiang, LIU Qi(杨万江, 刘 琦). Research of Agricultural Modernization(农业现代化研究), 2019, 40(1): 44.
[2] YANG Yong(杨 永). Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences(浙江农业科学), 2018, 59(7): 1082.
[3] HUANG Jia-rong, WU Bo-di, ZHAN Qiu-qiang(黄嘉荣, 伍博迪, 詹求强). Acta Laser Biology Sinica(激光生物学报), 2015, 24(3): 237.
[4] SUN Juan, ZHANG Hui, WANG Li, et al(孙 娟, 张 晖, 王 立, 等). Food & Machinery(食品与机械), 2016, 32(1): 41.
[5] ZHAO Ying, LI Ming, WANG Xiao-long, et al(赵 迎, 李 明, 王小龙). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2019, 39(5): 1468.
[6] SHA Min, GUI Dong-dong, ZHANG Zheng-yong, et al(沙 敏, 桂冬冬, 张正勇, 等). Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association(中国粮油学报). 2020, 35(1): 168.
[7] Hu H, Bai J, Xia G,et al. Photonic Sensors, 2018, 8(4): 332.
[8] Cai Y Y, Yang C H, Xu D G, et al. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2019, 50(3): 454.
[9] Monago-Marana O,Eskildsen C E,Afseth N K,et al. Food Chemistry, 2019, 274: 187.
[10] ZHU Zi-ying(朱自莹). Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Chemistry(拉曼光谱在化学中的应用). Changchun: Northeast University Press, 1998. 295.
[11] CHU Xiao-li(褚小立). Molecular Spectroscopy Analytical Technology Combined with Chemometrics and Its Appllcations(化学计量学方法与分子光谱分析技术). Beijing: Chemical Industry Publishing House(北京:化学工业出版社),2011. 49.
[12] Leon-Bejarano F, Mendez MO, Ramirez-Elias MG, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2019, 73(12): 1436. |
[1] |
LI Jie, ZHOU Qu*, JIA Lu-fen, CUI Xiao-sen. Comparative Study on Detection Methods of Furfural in Transformer Oil Based on IR and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 125-133. |
[2] |
WANG Fang-yuan1, 2, HAN Sen1, 2, YE Song1, 2, YIN Shan1, 2, LI Shu1, 2, WANG Xin-qiang1, 2*. A DFT Method to Study the Structure and Raman Spectra of Lignin
Monomer and Dimer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 76-81. |
[3] |
XING Hai-bo1, ZHENG Bo-wen1, LI Xin-yue1, HUANG Bo-tao2, XIANG Xiao2, HU Xiao-jun1*. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Channel Sensing Detection of Pyrene in
Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 95-102. |
[4] |
WANG Xin-qiang1, 3, CHU Pei-zhu1, 3, XIONG Wei2, 4, YE Song1, 3, GAN Yong-ying1, 3, ZHANG Wen-tao1, 3, LI Shu1, 3, WANG Fang-yuan1, 3*. Study on Monomer Simulation of Cellulose Raman Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 164-168. |
[5] |
WANG Lan-hua1, 2, CHEN Yi-lin1*, FU Xue-hai1, JIAN Kuo3, YANG Tian-yu1, 2, ZHANG Bo1, 4, HONG Yong1, WANG Wen-feng1. Comparative Study on Maceral Composition and Raman Spectroscopy of Jet From Fushun City, Liaoning Province and Jimsar County, Xinjiang Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 292-300. |
[6] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[7] |
WANG Zhi-qiang1, CHENG Yan-xin1, ZHANG Rui-ting1, MA Lin1, GAO Peng1, LIN Ke1, 2*. Rapid Detection and Analysis of Chinese Liquor Quality by Raman
Spectroscopy Combined With Fluorescence Background[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3770-3774. |
[8] |
LIU Hao-dong1, 2, JIANG Xi-quan1, 2, NIU Hao1, 2, LIU Yu-bo1, LI Hui2, LIU Yuan2, Wei Zhang2, LI Lu-yan1, CHEN Ting1,ZHAO Yan-jie1*,NI Jia-sheng2*. Quantitative Analysis of Ethanol Based on Laser Raman Spectroscopy Normalization Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3820-3825. |
[9] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[10] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[11] |
GUO He-yuanxi1, LI Li-jun1*, FENG Jun1, 2*, LIN Xin1, LI Rui1. A SERS-Aptsensor for Detection of Chloramphenicol Based on DNA Hybridization Indicator and Silver Nanorod Array Chip[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3445-3451. |
[12] |
ZHU Hua-dong1, 2, 3, ZHANG Si-qi1, 2, 3, TANG Chun-jie1, 2, 3. Research and Application of On-Line Analysis of CO2 and H2S in Natural Gas Feed Gas by Laser Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3551-3558. |
[13] |
LIU Jia-ru1, SHEN Gui-yun2, HE Jian-bin2, GUO Hong1*. Research on Materials and Technology of Pingyuan Princess Tomb of Liao Dynasty[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3469-3474. |
[14] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[15] |
ZHAO Ling-yi1, 2, YANG Xi3, WEI Yi4, YANG Rui-qin1, 2*, ZHAO Qian4, ZHANG Hong-wen4, CAI Wei-ping4. SERS Detection and Efficient Identification of Heroin and Its Metabolites Based on Au/SiO2 Composite Nanosphere Array[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3150-3157. |
|
|
|
|