|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on Model Transfer Method of Organic Matter Content
Estimation of Different Soils Using VNIR Spectroscopy |
HU Guo-tian1, 2, 3, SHANG Hui-wei1, 2, 3, TAN Rui-hong1, XU Xiang-hu1, PAN Wei-dong1 |
1. College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Internet of Things, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangling 712100, China
3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Information Perception and Intelligent Service, Yangling 712100, China
|
|
|
Abstract Soil properties can be estimated accurately and quickly using visible and near-infrared (VNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. However, a key problem is the lack of universal nutrient content calibration models for different soils. To improve the universality of the soil organic matter (SOM) content calibration model for different types of soils and the speed of online detection of the SOM in farmland, sixty-six samples of soil from M107B in the United States were used to establish the SOM content. Calibration model using the particle swarm optimization-based least squares support vector machines (PSO-LSSVM) method using VNIR spectroscopy. Then this calibration model predicted 23 samples of the validation set from M107B. The results gave the coefficient of determination (R2) and the ratio of standard deviation to root mean square error of prediction (RPD) of 0.859 and 2.660, respectively. Subsequently, we predicted the SOM content of the validation set, including 20 samples from N116B, by the PSO-LSSVM calibration model of all 89 soil samples from M107B. The results showed decreases in the R2-value (0.562) and RPD (0.952). These decreases in R2 and RPD values by 34.6% and 64.2%, respectively, indicated that the prediction accuracy was significantly decreased when the PSO-LSSVM calibration model of SOM content in M107B was directly used to predict SOM content in N116B. The PSO-LSSVM calibration model established by the calibration set, a combination of some soil samples from N116B and all 89 samples from M107B was also used to predict SOM content of the previous validation set from N116B and gave the R2 values that were more than 0.80 and RPD values that were more than 2.0 when the number of soil samples from N116B was added over 35. In addition, R2 increased from 0.562 to 0.811. RPD increased from 0.952 to 2.274 when the number of soil samples from N116B added to the calibration set increased from 0 to 50. The results showed that calibration model accuracy could be effectively improved by adding some soil samples from N116B to M107B calibration set when predicting SOM content in N116B. The prediction performance of models was stable, whereas the prediction accuracy met practical requirements when the number of soil samples from N116B added to the calibration set was more than 50. In addition, the calibration model of SOM in M107B was successfully transferred to the soil in N116B, and the samples in N116B with large differences in organic matter content or spectral curve from samples in M107B are preferred to adding to the calibration set because this method can effectively avoid the mutation of model transfer performance. In conclusion, the results provided a method to improve the SOM prediction accuracy of N116B soil using the SOM calibration model of M107B soil. Furthermore, the results provided a new, economical and feasible model transfer method for real-time estimating of SOM content in farmland based on VNIR. The results also provided an effective solution to improve the universality of the SOM content calibration model for different soil types.
|
Received: 2021-08-07
Accepted: 2022-03-03
|
|
|
[1] Ji W J, Rossel R A V, Shi Z. European Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 66(3): 555.
[2] Wang J Z, Tiyip T, Ding J L, et al. Journal of Spectroscopy, 2017,(1/2): 1.
[3] Tan Y, Jiang Q G, Yu L F, et al. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 5895.
[4] Brown D J, Shepherd K D, Walsh M G, et al. Geoderma, 2005, 132(3): 273.
[5] Krishnan P, Alexander J D, Butler B J, et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(6): 1282.
[6] CHEN Hao-yu, YANG Guang, HAN Xue-ying, et al(陈昊宇, 杨 光, 韩雪莹, 等). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(中国农业科技导报), 2021, 23(5): 132.
[7] JI Wen-jun, SHI Zhou, ZHOU Qing, et al(纪文君, 史 舟, 周 清, 等). Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2012, 31(3): 277.
[8] Padarian J, Minasny B, McBratney A B. Geoderma,2019, 340: 279.
[9] Panchuk V, Kirsanov D, Oleneva E, et al. Talanta,2017, 170: 457.
[10] Zheng K Y, Zhang X, Iqbal J, et al. Journal of Chemometrics, 2014, 28(10): 773.
[11] Dong X G, Dong J, Li Y L, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 156: 669.
[12] Vitaly P, Dmitry K, Ekaterina O, et al. Talanta, 2017, 170: 457.
[13] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agricultural Handbook 296, Washington, D. C. 2006, 332-334, 375-377.
[14] LIU Yan-de, WANG Jun-zheng, JIANG Xiao-gang, et al(刘燕德, 王军政, 姜小刚, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(7): 2064.
[15] ZHANG Wen, WU Zhi-bin, XU Jiu-ping(张 雯, 吴志彬, 徐玖平). Control and Decision(控制与决策), 2022, 37(7): 1837.
|
[1] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, WANG Xin-yue2, CUI Xia-hua2, CAO Wei-hua2, ZHANG Xiao-dong1*, ZHANG Ya-kun2. Classification of Qianxi Tomatoes by Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With GMO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3291-3297. |
[2] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1,2, YANG Li1,2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1,2, CUI Tao1,2, HE Xian-tao1,2, DU Zhao-hui1,2. Prediction of Organic Matter Content in Sandy Fluvo-Aquic Soil by
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2924-2930. |
[3] |
LI Rui1, LI Bo1*, WANG Xue-wen1, LIU Tao1, LI Lian-jie1,2, FAN Shu-xiang2. A Classification Method of Coal and Gangue Based on XGBoost and
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2947-2955. |
[4] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1, 2, YANG Li1, 2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1, 2, CUI Tao1, 2, HE Xian-tao1, 2, DU Zhao-hui1, 2. Effect of Different Particle Sizes on the Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content by Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2542-2550. |
[5] |
LI Xue-ying1, 2, LI Zong-min3*, CHEN Guang-yuan4, QIU Hui-min2, HOU Guang-li2, FAN Ping-ping2*. Prediction of Tidal Flat Sediment Moisture Content Based on Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1156-1161. |
[6] |
Yumiti Maiming1, WANG Xue-mei1, 2*. Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Continuous Wavelet Transformation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1278-1284. |
[7] |
ZHAO Rui1, SONG Hai-yan1*, ZHAO Yao2, SU Qin1, LI Wei1, SUN Yi-shu1, CHEN Ying-min1. Research on Anti-Moisture Interference Soil Organic Matter ModelBased on Characteristic Wavelength Integration Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 984-989. |
[8] |
LUO De-fang1, LIU Wei-yang1*, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui1, JI Wen-jun2, BAI Zi-jin1. Field in Situ Spectral Inversion of Cotton Organic Matter Based on Soil Water Removal Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 222-228. |
[9] |
YU Guo-wei1, MA Ben-xue1,2*, CHEN Jin-cheng1,3, DANG Fu-min4,5, LI Xiao-zhan1, LI Cong1, WANG Gang1. Vis-NIR Spectra Discriminant of Pesticide Residues on the Hami Melon Surface by GADF and Multi-Scale CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3701-3707. |
[10] |
LÜ Xue-gang1, 2,LI Xiu-hua1, 2*,ZHANG Shi-min2,ZHANG Mu-qing1, JIANG Hong-tao1. A Method for Detecting Sucrose in Living Sugarcane With Visible-NIR Transmittance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3747-3752. |
[11] |
HAO Yong1,DU Jiao-jun1, ZHANG Shu-min2, WANG Qi-ming1. Research on Construction of Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis Model for Soluble Solid Content in Different Colors of Jujube[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3385-3391. |
[12] |
WANG Si-yuan1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, WANG Hao1, GOU Si-yu2, LI Yu1, LI Xin-yu1, TAN Ai-ling1, JIANG Tian-jiu2, BI Wei-hong1*. Concentration Monitoring of Paralytic Shellfish Poison Producing Algae Based on Three Dimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3480-3485. |
[13] |
FAN Shu-xiang1, WANG Qing-yan1, YANG Yu-sen2, LI Jiang-bo1, ZHANG Chi1, TIAN Xi1, HUANG Wen-qian1*. Development and Experiment of a Handheld Visible/Near Infrared Device for Nondestructive Determination of Fruit Sugar Content[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3058-3063. |
[14] |
LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1*, FENG Chun-hui1, LIU Wei-yang1, JI Wen-jun2, WANG Nan3. Inversion of Soil Organic Matter Fraction in Southern Xinjiang by Visible-Near-Infrared and Mid-Infrared Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3069-3076. |
[15] |
LIU Chen-yang1,2, XU Huang-rong2,3, DUAN Feng4, WANG Tai-sheng1, LU Zhen-wu1, YU Wei-xing3*. Spectral Discrimination of Rabbit Liver VX2 Tumor and Normal Tissue Based on Genetic Algorithm-Support Vector Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3123-3128. |
|
|
|
|