|
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction of Organic Matter Content in Sandy Fluvo-Aquic Soil by
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1,2, YANG Li1,2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1,2, CUI Tao1,2, HE Xian-tao1,2, DU Zhao-hui1,2 |
1. College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Soil-Machine-Plant System Technology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
|
|
|
Abstract Soil Organic Matter (SOM) is a crucial soil parameter that affects the sowing rate. Real-time control of the sowing rate based on SOM information is the cutting-edge research area of planting technology, which can make full use of land resources to tap the yield potential, accurately and adequately adjust the number of seeds to maximize the return. This article focuses on the North China Plain, one of the main corn-producing areas, as the study area, and the sandy loam soil in this area has been collected by visible-near infrared (300~2 500 nm) spectra. Monte Carlo cross-validation is used to eliminate abnormal samples, and the Savitzky-Golay convolution smoothing method is used to smooth and denoise the spectral data. Respectively through Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), Successive projections algorithm (SPA), Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling-Successive projections algorithm (CARS-SPA), Uninformative variables elimination (UVE) and Variable Combination population Analysis (VCPA), and other wavelength screening methods to extract effective variables. Combined with Partial least squares regression (PLSR), the SOM content prediction models of full wavelength and characteristic wavelength were established respectively. The results showed significant differences in the number of wavelengths and wavelength positions screened by different methods. The spectral features selected by the CARS and SPA algorithms are distributed in the spectral range, while the bands selected by UVE and VCPA were concentrated. Moreover, the characteristic variables could be further optimized based on the CARS-SPA method, and the characteristic wavelength was only 15% of the total wavelength. By comparing the modeling and prediction effects of different models, except for the UVE and VCPA algorithms, the models constructed by the other algorithms can all effectively predict the SOM content, and their RPD values were all greater than 2.0. The PLSR model based on CARS-SPA has the best performance. Its R2P and RPD were 0.901 and 3.188 respectively, higher than other methods. It reduces the interference of invalid information on the prediction effect, but the computational efficiency of the model is significantly improved, which can realize the reliable prediction of SOM content in this area. This research can provide method references for rapid prediction of SOM content and instrument design.
|
Received: 2021-08-04
Accepted: 2021-11-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YANG Li
E-mail: yangli@cau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Kgel-Knabner I, Amelung W. Geoderma, 2021, 384(82): 114785.
[2] Kane D A, Bradford M A, Fuller E, et al. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16(4): 044018.
[3] YANG Li, YAN Bing-xin, ZHANG Dong-xing, et al(杨 丽, 颜丙新, 张东兴, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2016,47(11): 38.
[4] He X T, Ding Y Q, Zhang D X, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 162(7): 318.
[5] He X T, Ding Y Q, Zhang D X, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 162(7): 309.
[6] Ding Y, Yang L, Zhang D, et al. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2021, 14(2): 151.
[7] Bakr N, El-Ashry S M. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 2018,49(20): 2587.
[8] Morellos A, Pantazi X E, Moshou D, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2016, 152: 104.
[9] Said N, Mouazen A M. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 151: 469.
[10] Hong Y, Liu Y, Chen Y, et al. Geoderma,2019, 337: 758.
[11] Michael S, Christopher H, Bernard L, et al. Geoderma. 2019, 354: 113856.
[12] Roemer C, Rodionov A, Behmann J, et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2014, 177(6): 845.
[13] Laamrani A, Berg A, Voroney P, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(11): 1298.
[14] Vohland M, Ludwig M, Thiele-Bruhn S, et al. Geoderma, 2014, (223-225): 88.
[15] Viscarra Rossel R A, Hicks W S. European Journal of Soil Science,2015, 66(3): 438.
[16] Shi Z, Ji W, Rossel R A Viscarra, et al. European Journal of Soil Science,2015, 66(4): 679.
[17] ZHANG Zhi-tao, LAO Cong-cong, WANG Hai-feng, et al(张智韬, 劳聪聪, 王海峰, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2020, 51(1): 156.
[18] ZHANG Juan-juan, XI Lei, YANG Xiang-yang, et al(张娟娟, 席 磊, 杨向阳, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(17): 135.
[19] YU Lei, HONG Yong-sheng, ZHOU Yong, et al(于 雷, 洪永胜, 周 勇, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(13): 95.
[20] Hong Y S, Chen Y Y, Yu L, et al. Remote Sensing,2018, 10(3): 479.
[21] Liu Y, Jiang Q, Fei T, et al. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6(5): 4305.
|
[1] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[2] |
TANG Ruo-han1, 2, LI Xiu-hua1, 2*, LÜ Xue-gang1, 2, ZHANG Mu-qing2, 3, YAO Wei2, 3. Transmittance Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fibre Content of
Living Sugarcane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2419-2425. |
[3] |
CAI Hai-hui1, ZHOU Ling2, SHI Zhou3, JI Wen-jun4, LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui5*. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter in Jujube Orchard
in Southern Xinjiang Using CARS-BPNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2568-2573. |
[4] |
XIA Chen-zhen1, 2, 3, JIANG Yan-yan4, ZHANG Xing-yu1, 2, 3, SHA Ye5, CUI Shuai1, 2, 3, MI Guo-hua5, GAO Qiang1, 2, 3, ZHANG Yue1, 2, 3*. Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Field of Black Soil Area Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2617-2626. |
[5] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[6] |
LIN Jing-tao, XIN Chen-xing, LI Yan*. Spectral Characteristics of “Trapiche-Like Sapphire” From ChangLe, Shandong Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1199-1204. |
[7] |
MAO Xiao-tian1, CHEN Chang2, YIN Zuo-wei1*, WANG Zi-min1. Spectra Characterization of Cr-Grossular (Tsavorite) With “Frogspawn” Color Zoning From Canada[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 520-525. |
[8] |
BAO Pei-jin1, CHEN Quan-li1, 2*, WU Yan-han1, LI Xuan1, ZHAO An-di1. Spectroscopy Characteristics of Emerald From Swat Valley, Pakistan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 213-219. |
[9] |
HU Guo-tian1, 2, 3, SHANG Hui-wei1, 2, 3, TAN Rui-hong1, XU Xiang-hu1, PAN Wei-dong1. Research on Model Transfer Method of Organic Matter Content
Estimation of Different Soils Using VNIR Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3148-3154. |
[10] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, WANG Xin-yue2, CUI Xia-hua2, CAO Wei-hua2, ZHANG Xiao-dong1*, ZHANG Ya-kun2. Classification of Qianxi Tomatoes by Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With GMO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3291-3297. |
[11] |
LI Rui1, LI Bo1*, WANG Xue-wen1, LIU Tao1, LI Lian-jie1,2, FAN Shu-xiang2. A Classification Method of Coal and Gangue Based on XGBoost and
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2947-2955. |
[12] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1, 2, YANG Li1, 2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1, 2, CUI Tao1, 2, HE Xian-tao1, 2, DU Zhao-hui1, 2. Effect of Different Particle Sizes on the Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content by Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2542-2550. |
[13] |
JI Jiang-tao1, 2, LI Peng-ge1, JIN Xin1, 2*, MA Hao1, 2, LI Ming-yong1. Study on Quantitative Detection of Tomato Seedling Robustness
in Spring Seedling Transplanting Period Based on VIS-NIR
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1741-1748. |
[14] |
LI Xue-ying1, 2, LI Zong-min3*, CHEN Guang-yuan4, QIU Hui-min2, HOU Guang-li2, FAN Ping-ping2*. Prediction of Tidal Flat Sediment Moisture Content Based on Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1156-1161. |
[15] |
Yumiti Maiming1, WANG Xue-mei1, 2*. Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Continuous Wavelet Transformation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1278-1284. |
|
|
|
|