|
|
|
|
|
|
| Deep Learning Modelling and Model Transfer for Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Quantitative Analysis |
| FU Peng-you1, 2, WEN Yue2, ZHANG Yu-ke3, LI Ling-qiao1*, YANG Hui-hua1, 2* |
1. School of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2. School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
3. School of International, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Near-infrared spectroscoqy analysis technologyrelies on Chemometric methods that characterize the relationships between the spectral matrix and the chemical or physical properties. However, the samples’ spectra are composed of signals and various noises. It is difficult for traditional Chemometric methods to extract the effective features of the spectra and establish a calibration model with strong generative performance for a complex assay. Furthermore, the same quantitative analysis results cannot be achieved when the calibration model established on one instrument is applied to another because of the differences between the instruments. Hence, this paper presents a quantitative analysis modeling and model transfer frameworkbased on convolution neural networks and transfer learning to improve model prediction performance on one instrument and across the instrument. An advanced model named MSRCNN is presented based on a convolutional neural network, which integrates multi-scale feature fusion and residual structure and shows outstanding model generalization performance on the master instrument. Then, four transfer learning methods based on fine-tuning are proposed to transfer the MSRCNN established on the master instrument to the slave instrument. The experimental results on open accessed datasets of drug and wheat show that the RMSE and R2 of MSRCNN on the master instrument are 2.587, 0.981, and 0.309, 0.977, respectively, which outperforms PLS, SVM, and CNN. Byusing 30 slave instrument samples, the transfer of the convolutional layer and fully connected layer in the MSRCNN model is the most effective among the four fine-tune methods, with RMSE and R2 2.289, 0.982, and 0.379, 0.965, respectively. The performance can be further improved by increasing the sample of slave instruments that participated in model transferring.
|
|
Received: 2021-11-29
Accepted: 2022-08-17
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Ling-qiao, YANG Hui-hua
E-mail: 54pe@163.com; yhh@bupt.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Ashie A, Lei H, Han B, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2021, 113: 103629.
[2] Miao X, Miao Y, Gong H, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2021, 257: 119700.
[3] Behkami S, Zain S M, Gholami M, et al. Food Chemistry, 2019, 294: 309.
[4] Li D, Wang A, Li Y, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(2): 441.
[5] Huang X, Luo Y P, Xia L. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2019, 194: 103872.
[6] Mishra P, Roger J M, Marini F, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2021, 212: 104190.
[7] Workman J J. Applied Spectroscopy, 2018, 72(3): 340.
[8] Malli B, Birlutiu A, Natschläger T. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2017, 161: 49.
[9] Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Shan P, et al. Molecules, 2019, 24(9): 1802.
[10] Zou C, Zhu H, Shen J, et al. Analytical Methods, 2019, 11(35): 4481.
[11] Chen Y, Wang Z. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2019, 192: 103824.
[12] Luo Y, Yang S, Tian H, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2020, 104: 103053.
[13] Liu C, Yang S X, Li X, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2020, 201: 104014.
[14] Passos D, Mishra P. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2021: 104354.
[15] Hu R, Zhang L, Yu Z, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2019, 102: 102999.
[16] Acquarelli J, van Laarhoven T, Gerretzen J, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2017, 954: 22.
[17] Zhang X, Lin T, Xu J, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2019, 1058: 48.
[18] Dong J E, Wang Y, Zuo Z T, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2020, 197: 103913.
[19] Jiang D, Qi G, Hu G, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2020, 111: 103494.
[20] Zhao Y, Yu J, Shan P, et al. Molecules, 2019, 24(7): 1289.
[21] Zhang F, Zhang R, Wang W, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2019, 195: 103896.
[22] Zhang J, Guo C, Cui X, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2019, 1050: 25.
[23] Zhuang F, Qi Z, Duan K, et al. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2020, 109(1): 43.
[24] Jiang Y, Gu X, Wu D, et al. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2020, 18(1): 40.
[25] Xie H, Liu B, Xiao Y. Information Sciences, 2021, 547: 526.
[26] Zhang S, Sun F, Wang N, et al. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2019, 32(6): 995.
[27] Pikuliak M, Simko M, Bielikova M. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 165: 113765.
[28] Li L, Pan X, Chen W, et al. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences, 2020, 13(4): 2050016.
[29] Mishra P, Passos D. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2021, 212: 104283.
[30] Mishra P, Passos D. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2021, 117: 103863.
[31] Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, et al. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2015: 1.
[32] He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016: 770.
[33] Chen Y, Wang Z. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2019, 191: 103.
|
| [1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
| [2] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [3] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
| [4] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
| [5] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
| [6] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
| [7] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
| [8] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
| [9] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
| [10] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
| [11] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
| [12] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
| [13] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
| [14] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
| [15] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
|
|
|
|
