|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on Inversion Model of Chlorophyll Content in Soybean Leaf Based on Optimal Spectral Indices |
LIU Shuang, YU Hai-ye, ZHANG Jun-he, ZHOU Hai-gen, KONG Li-juan, ZHANG Lei, DANG Jing-min, SUI Yuan-yuan* |
School of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China |
|
|
Abstract The accurate acquisition and prediction of chlorophyll content can provide a theoretical basis for precise management of crop planting. Optimal spectral index was used to establish the soybean chlorophyll content inversion model in this paper. The hyperspectral and chlorophyll content data of soybean flower bud differentiation were obtained. Firstly, seven typical spectral indices related to chlorophyll content were constructed, namely ratio index (RI), difference index (DI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), modified simple ratio index (mSR), modified normalized difference index (mNDI), soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) and triangular vegetation index (TVI), respectively. First derivative (FD) processing was performed on the original hyper spectrum, and then the original and first derivative hyper spectrum are combined with all wavelengths in the full spectrum wavelength range to calculate 14 spectral indices. Then use the correlation matrix method to select the optimal spectral index. The correlation analysis was conducted between the spectral index calculated by all wavelength combinations and chlorophyll content. The maximum value of the correlation coefficient was taken as the index to extract the 14 optimal wavelength combinations, and the corresponding spectral index value was calculated as the optimal spectral index. Finally, the optimal spectral indices were divided into three groups as model input variables combined with the three methods of Partial least squares regression (PLS), Least squares support vector machine regression (LSSVM), and LASSO regression to model, then compare and analyze the results. The coefficients of determination R2c, R2p and the root mean square error RMSEC and RMSEP as model evaluation indicators, then soybean chlorophyll content inversion model with the highest accuracy, were finally selected. The results show that the 14 optimal spectral index wavelength combinations are RI (728, 727), DI (735, 732), NDVI (728, 727), mSR (728, 727), mNDI (728, 727), SAVI (728, 727), TVI (1 007, 708), FDRI (727, 708), FDDI (727, 788), FDNDVI (726, 705), FDmSR (726, 705), FDmNDI (726, 705), FDSAVI (727, 788) and FDTVI (760, 698), the maximum correlation coefficient with chlorophyll content are all greater than 0.8. The method to establish the optimal chlorophyll inversion model was the LSSVM modeling method combined with the first derivative spectral index (combination 2). The R2c=0.751 8, R2p=0.836 0, RMSEC=1.361 2, RMSEP=1.220 4, indicating that the model had high accuracy and could provide a reference for monitoring the growth status of soybean in a large area.
|
Received: 2020-07-24
Accepted: 2020-10-16
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SUI Yuan-yuan
E-mail: suiyuan@jlu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Lu X T,Lu S. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2015,36(5):1447.
[2] Ramesh K,Sedigheh S,Nitya M,et al. PLOS ONE,2020,15(6):e0233905.
[3] Tan K Z,Wang S W,Song Y Z,et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,2018,172:68.
[4] Wang J J,Li Z K,Jin X L,et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2019,162:475.
[5] Cao Q,Miao Y X,Li F,et al. Precision Agriculture,2018,18(1):2.
[6] Yang P Q,Christiaan V L,Campbell P K E,et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,2020,240: 111676.
[7] Xu X Q,Lu J S,Zhang N,et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2019,150:185.
[8] Román J R,Rodríguez-Caballero E,Rodríguez-Lozano B,et al. Remote Sensing,2019,11(11): 1.
[9] LIU Tan,XU Tong-yu,YU Feng-hua,et al(刘 潭,许童羽,于丰华,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报),2020,(5):156.
[10] Alison D,Yu R,Chloe R. Annals of Forest Science,2020,77(2): 30.
[11] Bekele F,Korecha D,Negatu L. Journal of Agrometeorology,2017,19(2):125.
[12] Sun H,Feng M C,Xiao L J,et al. PLOS ONE,2019,14(6):e0216890.
[13] Lu J Z,Ehsani R,Shi Y Y. Scientific Reports,2018,8: 2793.
[14] NIJIATI Kamusi,SHI Qing-dong,WANG Jing-zhe,et al(尼加提·卡斯木,师庆东,王敬哲,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报),2017,33(22):208. |
[1] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
[2] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[3] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[4] |
WANG Jing-yong1, XIE Sa-sa2, 3, GAI Jing-yao1*, WANG Zi-ting2, 3*. Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Chlorophyll Content in Sugarcane Leaves Under Stress of Mosaic[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2885-2893. |
[5] |
ZHANG Zi-hao1, GUO Fei3, 4, WU Kun-ze1, YANG Xin-yu2, XU Zhen1*. Performance Evaluation of the Deep Forest 2021 (DF21) Model in
Retrieving Soil Cadmium Concentration Using Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2638-2643. |
[6] |
QIAN Duo, SU Wen-en, LIU Zhi-yuan, GAO Xiao-yu, YI Yu-xin, HU Cong-cong, LIU Bin, YANG Sheng-yuan*. Soy Protein Gold Nanocluster as an “Off-On” Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Bacillus Anthracis Biomarkers DPA[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1815-1820. |
[7] |
YANG Liu1, GUO Zhong-hui1, JIN Zhong-yu1, BAI Ju-chi1, YU Feng-hua1, 2, XU Tong-yu1, 2*. Inversion Method Research of Phosphorus Content in Rice Leaves Produced in Northern Cold Region Based on WPA-BP[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1442-1449. |
[8] |
LIU Shuang1, YU Hai-ye2, SUI Yuan-yuan2, KONG Li-juan3, YU Zhan-dong1, GUO Jing-jing2, QIAO Jian-lei1*. Hyperspectral Data Analysis for Classification of Soybean Leaf Diseases[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1550-1555. |
[9] |
WANG Yan-cang1, 4, LI Xiao-fang2, LI Li-jie5, LI Nan1, 4*, JIANG Qian-nan1, 4, GU Xiao-he3, YANG Xiu-feng1, 4LIN Jia-lu1, 4. Quantitative Inversion of Chlorophyll Content in Stem and Branch of
Pitaya Based on Discrete Wavelet Differential Transform Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 549-556. |
[10] |
LI Xiao-kai, YU Hai-ye, YU Yue, WANG Hong-jian, ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Xin, SUI Yuan-yuan*. Inversion Model of Clorophyll Content in Rice Based on a Bonic
Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 93-99. |
[11] |
GUO Zong-yu, GUO Yi-xin, JIN Wei-qi*, HE Yu-qing, QIU Su. Rapid Identification of Transgenic Soybean Oil Based on Ultraviolet Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3830-3835. |
[12] |
CHEN Lei1, 2, HAO Xiao-yu1, MA Xing-zhu1, ZHOU Bao-ku1, WEI Dan3, ZHOU Lei4, LIU Rong-le5, WANG Hong2*. Changes in Organic Carbon Components and Structure of Black Rhizosphere Soil Under Long-Term Different Fertilization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3883-3888. |
[13] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, TAO Hui-lin1, ZHAO Yu1, YANG Fu-qin3, FAN Yi-guang1, YANG Gui-jun1*. Estimation of Chlorophyll Content in Winter Wheat Based on UAV Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3575-3580. |
[14] |
GAO Shi-jiao1, GUAN Hai-ou1*, MA Xiao-dan1, WANG Yan-hong2. Soybean Canopy Extraction Method Based on Multispectral Image Processing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3568-3574. |
[15] |
JIN Cheng-qian1, 2, GUO Zhen1, ZHANG Jing1, MA Cheng-ye1, TANG Xiao-han1, ZHAO Nan1, YIN Xiang1. Non-Destructive Detection and Visualization of Soybean Moisture Content Using Hyperspectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3052-3057. |
|
|
|
|