|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Evaluation of the Deep Forest 2021 (DF21) Model in
Retrieving Soil Cadmium Concentration Using Hyperspectral Data |
ZHANG Zi-hao1, GUO Fei3, 4, WU Kun-ze1, YANG Xin-yu2, XU Zhen1* |
1. Department of Electronic Information Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
3. Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, China Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China
4. Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
|
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral technology can provide nearly continuous spectral curves of ground objects, which has excellent potential for retrievingthe soil's components. This paper investigates components retrieval from contaminated soil by hyperspectral technology. By so doing, it analyzes thesoil cadmium (Cd) concentration measured in the laboratory and the corresponding hyperspectral curvature data obtained at the same period, following whichthe retrieval model for the soil Cd concentration from the hyperspectral data in light with the (Deep Forest 2021, DF21) model is developed. In this study, the original spectrum(OS) data and the data processed by the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are used as the model's input parameters. Subsequently, two models, i.e., the OS-DF21 model based on the original spectral data and the PCA-DF21 model based on the PCA processed data, are established. The relationships between the input parameters and soil Cd concentration are respectively obtained by the OS-DF21 model and PCA-DF21 model. Then the soil Cd concentrationis estimated from the testing samples accordingly. To evaluate the retrieval performance, three indices, namely the coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Residual Predictive Deviation (RPD) applied in this study. It is found that the OS-DF21 model has the best performance for the retrieval of soil Cd concentration, whose R2, RMSE, and RPD are 0.873, 0.120, and 2.892, respectively. In contrast, the PCA-DF21 model has arelatively lower retrieval accuracy, with R2, RMSE, and RPD being 0.779, 0.159, and 2.190, though the PCA can reduce the dimensionality of the spectral data. In this regard, the DF21 shows good retrieval performance and can be an essential supplementary method for soil heavy metal surveys in the study area and similar environmental regions.
|
Received: 2022-04-18
Accepted: 2022-07-12
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Zi-hao1, GUO Fei3, 4, WU Kun-ze1, YANG Xin-yu2, XU Zhen1*
E-mail: xuzhen@stu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Liao M, Xie X, Ma A, et al. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10(5): 818.
[2] HU Qing-qing, NIE Chao-jia, SHEN Qiang, et al(胡青青,聂超甲,沈 强,等). Journal of Agro-Environment Science (农业环境科学学报), 2019, 38(3): 534.
[3] XU Xi-bo, ZHANG Sen-lin, BO Fan-sheng, et al(徐夕博,张森林,卜凡升,等). Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences(河南农业科学), 2018, 47(7): 77.
[4] LEI Yu-bin, LIU Ning, GUO Yun-kai, et al(雷宇斌,刘 宁,郭云开,等). Engineering of Surveying and Mapping(测绘工程), 2018, 27(11): 71.
[5] LAN Miao, YANG Bin, SONG Qiang, et al(兰 淼,杨 斌,宋 强,等). Journal of Anhui Polytechnic University(安徽工程大学学报), 2021, 36(5): 47.
[6] LIU Hui-min, ZHEN Jia-qi, LIU Yong, et al(刘慧敏,甄佳奇,刘 勇,等). Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization(中国农机化学报) , 2020, 41(9): 190.
[7] LU Zhi-hong, LIU Xin-yao, CHANG Shu-juan, et al(卢志宏,刘辛瑶,常书娟,等). Pratacultural Science(草业科学), 2018, 35(9): 2127.
[8] Zhou Z H, FENG J. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Melbourne, Australia, AAAI Press,2017: 3553.
[9] He Yong, Song Haiyan, Pereira A G, et al. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, 2005,6(11): 1081.
[10] Ministry of Ecological Environment, State Administration for Market Regulatory(生态环境部、国家市场监督管理总局). National Standard of the People's Republic of China GB 15618—2018 Soil Environment Quality-Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Agriculture Land [中华人民共和国国家标准(GB 15618—2018土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行))], 2018.
[11] Liu F, Ting K, Yu Y, et al. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2008,(32): 355.
[12] GUO Fei, XU Zhen, MA Hong-hong, et al(郭 飞,许 镇,马宏宏,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(5): 1625.
|
[1] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
[2] |
XUE Fang-jia, YU Jie*, YIN Hang, XIA Qi-yu, SHI Jie-gen, HOU Di-bo, HUANG Ping-jie, ZHANG Guang-xin. A Time Series Double Threshold Method for Pollution Events Detection in Drinking Water Using Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3081-3088. |
[3] |
ZHANG Yue1, 3, ZHOU Jun-hui1, WANG Si-man1, WANG You-you1, ZHANG Yun-hao2, ZHAO Shuai2, LIU Shu-yang2*, YANG Jian1*. Identification of Xinhui Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium of Different Aging Years Based on Visible-Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3286-3292. |
[4] |
LI Bin, SU Cheng-tao, YIN Hai, LIU Yan-de*. Hyperspectral Imaging Technology Combined With Machine Learning for Detection of Moldy Rice[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2391-2396. |
[5] |
YANG Liu1, GUO Zhong-hui1, JIN Zhong-yu1, BAI Ju-chi1, YU Feng-hua1, 2, XU Tong-yu1, 2*. Inversion Method Research of Phosphorus Content in Rice Leaves Produced in Northern Cold Region Based on WPA-BP[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1442-1449. |
[6] |
BAI Zi-jin1, PENG Jie1*, LUO De-fang1, CAI Hai-hui1, JI Wen-jun2, SHI Zhou3, LIU Wei-yang1, YIN Cai-yun1. A Mid-Infrared Spectral Inversion Model for Total Nitrogen Content of Farmland Soil in Southern Xinjiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2768-2773. |
[7] |
PIAO Zhao-jia, YU Hai-ye, ZHANG Jun-he, ZHOU Hai-gen, LIU Shuang, KONG Li-juan, DANG Jing-min*. Hyperspectral Inversion Model of Pectin Content in Wheat Under Salt and Physical Damage Stresses[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2935-2940. |
[8] |
WANG Chun-ling1, 2, SHI Kai-yuan1, 2, MING Xing3*, CONG Mao-qin3, LIU Xin-yue3, GUO Wen-ji3. A Comparative Study of the COD Hyperspectral Inversion Models in
Water Based on the Maching Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2353-2358. |
[9] |
JIANG Wan-li1, 2, SHI Jun-sheng1, 2*, JI Ming-jiang1, 2. Establishment of Visible and NIR Spectral Reflectance Database of Plant Leaves and Principal Component Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2366-2373. |
[10] |
WANG Yan1, 2, 3, WANG Bao-rui1, 2, 3*, WANG Yue1, 2, 3. Study on Radical Characteristics of Methane Laminar Premixed Flame Based on Hyperspectral Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2403-2410. |
[11] |
BAI Xue-bing, MA Dian-kun, ZHANG Meng-jie, MA Rui-qin*. Hyperspectral Non-Destructive Analysis of Red Meat Quality: A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 1993-1998. |
[12] |
CHEN Yuan-zhe1, WANG Qiao-hua1, 2*, TIAN Wen-qiang1, XU Bu-yun1, HU Jian-chao1. Nondestructive Determinations of Texture and Quality of Preserved Egg Gel by Hyperspectral Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1985-1992. |
[13] |
JIANG Qing-hu1, LIU Feng1, YU Dong-yue2, 3, LUO Hui2, 3, LIANG Qiong3*, ZHANG Yan-jun3*. Rapid Measurement of the Pharmacological Active Constituents in Herba Epimedii Using Hyperspectral Analysis Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1445-1450. |
[14] |
LI De-hui1, WU Tai-xia1*, WANG Shu-dong2*, LI Zhe-hua1, TIAN Yi-wei1, FEI Xiao-long1, LIU Yang1, LEI Yong3, LI Guang-hua3. Hyperspectral Indices for Identification of Red Pigments Used in Cultural Relic[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1588-1594. |
[15] |
FU Yan-hua1, LIU Jing2*, MAO Ya-chun2, CAO Wang2, HUANG Jia-qi2, ZHAO Zhan-guo3. Experimental Study on Quantitative Inversion Model of Heavy Metals in Soda Saline-Alkali Soil Based on RBF Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1595-1600. |
|
|
|
|