光谱二阶差分Gabor展开法土壤铜铅污染鉴别

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2018)10-3245-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4304 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Soil is an important carrier of the human living environments. Therefore, the problem of soil heavy metal pollution has always attracted attention. With the development of remote sensing technology, much progress has been made in the area of hyperspectral remote sensing, which is used for the study of the heavy metal content of soil. However, this method works basically in accordance with spectral absorption features, as well as the content of soil organic matter, iron and clay minerals, when retrieving the heavy metal content of soil. It has been found to be unable to distinguish the slight differences in the soil heavy metal pollution spectra. In this study, a potting soil pollution experiment with different concentrations of copper (Cu) and lead (Pb) was used to obtain the potting soil spectral curve, as well as the water and organic matter content of the soil under different concentrations of Cu and Pb stress. The purpose of the experiment was to put forward a type of second-order differential Gabor expansion method for the detection of the slight differences between the soil’s spectral curves under different concentrations of Cu and Pb stress. Firstly, based on the second-order difference method, the soil spectrawere converted into sparse spectra by the method, then the sparse spectrum of soil and Gabor expansion theory were combined to detect the weak differences of heavy metal stress spectra in different concentration soils in the frequency domain. Therefore, instead of studying the content of soil heavy metal solely by the spectral reflectance information, this method performed time-frequency analysis on the spectral information of soil heavy metal stress and finally achieved the purpose of detecting the instantaneous spectrum of soil heavy metal pollution. The results showed that the Cu-contaminated potting soil spectra displayed major differences in the scale distribution of the second-order differential Gabor expansion coefficient when compared with the Pb-contaminated potting soil spectra. In addition, the scale of second-order differential Gabor expansion coefficient of the Cu-contaminated soil spectra ranged from 1 800^th to 3 600^th items sparse, the scale of second-order differential Gabor expansion coefficient of the Pb-contaminated soil spectra ranged from 3 200^th to 3 600^th items coarctate. By utilizing a second-order differential Gabor expansion method, the detected results of the Cu and Pb pollution in the soil were found to be closely related to soil’s Cu and Pb content, water content and organic matter. As a result of the different Cu and Pb content in the soil, as well as the organic matter content and water content, the second-order differential Gabor expansion spectra of the soil’s Cu and Pb pollution displayed different scale distributions. According to the correlation analysis results, the soil’s Cu and Pb pollution were divided into three grades respectively: Cu(50)~Cu(300), Cu(400)~Cu(800), Cu(1 000) or more；lowerthan Pb(50), Pb(100)~Pb(300), Pb(400)~Pb(1 200).

Key words：Soil Cu and Pb pollution spectral detection; Sparse spectrum; Second-order differential Gabor expansion method; Spectral scale

Received: 2017-12-02 Accepted: 2018-04-03

ZTFLH:

TP7

Corresponding Authors: YANG Ke-ming E-mail: ykm69@163.com

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2018)10-3245-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2018/V38/I10/3245

[1] ZHENG Yong-hong, ZHANG Zhi-guo, YAO Duo-xi, et al(郑永红, 张治国, 姚多喜, 等). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2013, 38(8): 1476.
[2] SHI Zhan-fei，WANG Li(石占飞, 王力). Journal of Agro-Environment Science (农业环境科学学报), 2013, 32(6): 1150.
[3] WU Jian-sheng, SONG Jing, ZHENG Mao-kun, et al(吴健生, 宋静, 郑茂坤, 等). Journal of Northeast(东北农业大学学报) , 2011, 42(5): 133.
[4] XIAO Jie-ying, WANG Yan, ZHANG Qian, et al(肖捷颖, 王燕, 张倩, 等). Hubei Agricultural Sciences(湖北农业科学), 2013, 52(6): 1248.
[5] SHEN Wen-juan, JIANG Chao-qun, SHI Hao, et al(沈文娟, 蒋超群, 侍昊, 等). Remote Sensing Information(遥感信息), 2014, 29(6): 112.
[6] GONG Shao-qi, WANG Xin, SHEN Run-ping, et al(龚绍琦, 王鑫, 沈润平, 等). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用)，2010, 25(2): 169.
[7] NAN Cong-qiang, LIU Han-hu, FAN Juan, et al(南聪强, 刘汉湖, 范娟, 等). Soil and Water Conservation in China(中国水土保持), 2010, (10): 70.
[8] Stazi S R, Antonucci F, Pallottino F, et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2014，45(22)：2911.
[9] Gholizadeh A, Borvka L, Vaát R, et al. PloS One, 2015, 10(2), e0117457.
[10] Xia X Q, Mao Y Q, Ji J F, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(10), 3449.
[11] WANG Xiao-hua, DENG Ka-zhong, YANG Hua-chao(王晓华, 邓喀中, 杨化超). Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping(测绘通报), 2013, (3): 29.
[12] HE Jun-liang, ZHANG Shu-yuan, CHA Yong, et al(贺军亮, 张淑媛, 查勇, 等). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2015, 30(3): 407.
[13] HOU Li-min, WU Wei-qi, ZHANG Xin-peng(侯丽敏, 吴威麒, 张新鹏). Journal of Shanghai University·Natural Science Edition(上海大学学报·自然科学版), 2014, 20(3): 304.
[14] FENG Pan, CAO Xian-bing(冯盼, 曹显兵). Mathematics in Practice and Theory(数学的实践与认识), 2011, 41(22): 84.
[15] HE Xia, LIN Jian-zhi, ZHANG Yue, et al(贺夏, 林健智, 张月, 等). Signal Processing(信号处理), 2011, 27(11): 1734.
[16] LI Xing-hui, HU Xiao-qing, YIN Jun-xia(李兴慧, 胡小青, 阴俊霞). Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique(组合机床与自动化加工技术), 2014, (1): 29.