基于高光谱壁画盐分指数的模拟壁画盐含量反演

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3272-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5607 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Disruption and salt efflorescence are mainlycaused by the soluble salts found in the mural paintings, which are irreversible and hurt the frescoes' health. Quantifying the inversion of soluble salts contained in murals using non-contact hyperspectral techniques is significant. A mural salt content inversion model based on a hyperspectral salt index is proposed to address the problems of high cost, low timeliness, and the need for field sampling for mural salt detection. Indoors, mock mural samples with varying salt content gradients (salt soil ratio: 0～1%) were made with yellow sandy soil and wheat straw fine hemp mixed with anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The ASD-FieldSpec4HI-RES spectrometer was used for spectral acquisition. The sample spectral set was created after break pointcorrection and averaging, which was randomly divided into a calibration subset and validation subset in the ratio of 7∶3. The original reflectance (R) was subjected to four enhancement processes: first-order differentiation (R+1D), first-order differentiation after Continuum Removal (CR+1D), first-order differentiation after Logarithm Reciprocal (LR+1D), and first-order differentiation after Savitzky-Golay smoothing (SG+1D). The original reflectance and enhanced spectral data were correlated with the salt concentration, and the top three strong correlation bands with high contribution were extracted. Single-band regression models were established by linear and parabolic fitting with the strongest correlation bands, respectively. The first three correlation bands were used to create a hyperspectral mural salinity index (MSI) which was then compared to the normalized salinity index (NDSI), three salinity indices (SI₁ SI₂ SI₃), and the brightness index (BI) for accuracy evaluation. The evaluation metrics are the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), and slope of the fit scatter line with intercept. The results show: (1) with the increase of salt content, the overall reflectance spectral curve first decreases and then increases. The reflectance is lowest in the range of salt content of 0.3%～0.6% for the mural samples. (2) The sensitive bands of Na₂SO₄ in the murals are 1 420, 1 940 and 2 210 nm, and there are also some sensitive bands in the visible range. (3) The first-order derivative transformed spectra are strongly correlated to salt concentration, with the highest R² enhancement of 0.646. (4) The R-1D-MSI inversion model has the highest accuracy, with R²_C and RMSE_C of 0.857 and 0.116, respectively. This study can provide a new technical means for the rapid and nondestructive detection of salt content in murals.

Key words：Mural disruption; Hyperspectral; Fitted regression; Spectral index; Salt content; Inversion

Received: 2022-05-07 Accepted: 2022-10-07

ZTFLH:

TP79

Corresponding Authors: HOU Miao-le E-mail: houmiaole@bucea.edu.cn

Cite this article:

GUO Zhou-qian,Lü Shu-qiang,HOU Miao-le, et al. Inversion of Salt Content in Simulated Mural Based on Hyperspectral Mural Salt Index[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3272-3279.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3272-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2023/V43/I10/3272

[1] LIANG Jin-xing, WAN Xiao-xia, SUN Zhi-jun, et al(梁金星, 万晓霞, 孙志军, 等). Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology(文物保护与考古科学), 2019, 31(2): 37.
[2] ZHENG Zhi-hua(郑志华). Journal of Natural Disasters(自然灾害学报), 2020, 29(6): 6.
[3] ZHANG Ya-xu, YU Zong-ren, WANG Li-qin, et al(张亚旭, 于宗仁, 王丽琴, 等). Dunhuang Research(敦煌研究), 2021, 48(1): 8.
[4] YU Zong-ren, WANG Yan-wu, WANG Xiao-wei, et al(于宗仁, 王彦武, 王小伟, 等). Advances in Earth Scinence(地球科学进展), 2017, 32(6): 668.
[5] DU Hong-ying, ZHOU Lei, SU Bo-min, et al(杜红英, 周雷, 苏伯民, 等). Dunhuang Research(敦煌研究), 2009, (6): 44.
[6] Wang Fenghe, Gao Jay, Zha Yong, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2018, 136: 73.
[7] GMartín J F, Badaró A T, Barbin D F, et al. Processes, 2020, 8(7): 823.
[8] ZHOU Wei, XIE Li-juan, YANG Han, et al(周伟, 谢利娟, 杨晗, 等). Chinese Journal of Soil Science(土壤通报), 2021, 52(3): 11.
[9] Amer M M, Tyler A, Fouda T, et al. Scientific Papers Series “Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development”, 2017, 17(3): 47.
[10] GUO Xue-fei, CAO Ying, JIAO Run-cheng, et al(郭学飞, 曹颖, 焦润成, 等). Chinese Journal of Soil Science(土壤通报), 2021, 52(4): 8.
[11] HUANG Zhao-qiang, NI Bin(黄照强, 倪斌). Geological Review(地质评论), 2021, 67(5): 12.
[12] SI Yan-e, YAN Jing, ZHAO Xi-chen, et al(葸艳娥, 严静, 赵西晨, 等). Relics and Museolgy(文博), 2020, (6): 92.
[13] WANG Ju-lin, ZHANG Yi-dong, WU Yu-qing, et al(王菊琳, 张屹东, 吴玉清, 等). Surface Technology(表面技术), 2017, 46(2): 1.
[14] GUO Kun-ming, JIA Ke-li, JIE Yao-wen(郭昆明, 贾科利, 颉耀文). Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences)[兰州大学学报(自然科学版)], 2020, 56(5): 623.
[15] LI Jing, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun, et al(李静，王克如，李少昆, 等). Cotton Science(棉花学报), 2014, 26(6): 555.
[16] HAN Yang, XU Wen-ru, JIN Lun(韩阳, 徐文茹, 金伦). Journal of Infrared & Millimeter Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2015, 34(5): 1640.