|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area |
| QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1 |
1. College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650233, China
2. College of Big Data and Intelligent Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650233, China
3. Institute of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, Southwest Forestry University, Knuming 650233, China
4. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forestry and Ecological Big Data, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650233, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract To explore the extraction effect of the rich spectral information of hyperspectral images on tea plantations in mountainous regions and to promote the application of domestic satellite hyperspectral images in tea plantations distribution mapping and resource monitoring. Taking the typical distribution area of tea plantations in the southern mountainous region of Pu'er City as the study area, an algorithm for tea plantations extraction in subtropical mountainous regions based on the random forest (RF) classifier was constructed, and the main data sources, including the hyperspectral 5 AHSI (GF-5 AHSI) image, digital elevation model (DEM), and the field survey data. Firstly, the 250 bands of GF-5 AHSI image after removing the noise bandsused as spectral features (SF). Based on the spectral analysis of the main features (tea plantation, forest and cropland) in the study area and DEM data, 45 vegetation index features (VIF) and 3 topographic features (TRF) were constructed, respectively. Moreover, the RF was used to rank the feature importance of each feature, and the features were input into the RF classifier for tea plantations extraction in order of feature importance from highest to lowest. The feature dimension of the optimal feature space is determined when the F1-Score of the tea plantations reaches saturation and no longer increases significantly with the continuous input of features. Finally, 12 classification schemes were constructed based on 3 feature factors (SF, VIF and TRF). Moreover, the accuracy of tea plantations extraction was compared among the 12 schemes and the optimal scheme was finally determined. The results showed that the producer's accuracy (PA) and user's accuracy (UA) of the 6 classification schemes after feature selection (FS) were better than those of the 6 schemes before FS. The VIF+TRF scheme had the best extraction accuracy (PA: 89.72%, UA: 81.97%) among the 6 classification schemes before FS, while the best performance of tea plantations extraction accuracy after FS was the SF+VIF+TRE scheme (PA: 90.69%, UA: 83.09%). The F1-Score of tea plantations extraction with different feature combinations was ranked as SF+VIF+TRE+FS>TRF+VIF+FS>SF+TRF+FS>TRF+VIF>VIF+FS>SF+VIF+FS>SF+VIF+FS>SF+VIF+TRF>SF+FS>SF+TRF>VIF>SF+VIF>SF. Among the 6 classification schemes after FS, the bands that were selected twice in the 4 schemes in which SF was involved in classification were b4, b5, b6, b27, b133, b150 and b281; the indices that were selected four times in the 4 schemes in which VIF was involved in classification were REP, VOG2, SR2, SR3, WBI, TIP3 and TIP9 and all terrain factors were selected in the 4 classification schemes in which TRF participated. SF+TRF+VIF features combined with the RF algorithm after FS can effectively identify the distribution of subtropical tea plantations with good recognition accuracy and credibility. The GF-5 AHSI satellite data has good potential and prospects for application in tea plantations distribution mapping and resource monitoring.
|
|
Received: 2022-05-30
Accepted: 2022-09-21
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XU Wei-heng
E-mail: xwh@swfu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] LI Long-wei, LI Nan, LU Deng-sheng, et al(李龙伟, 李 楠, 陆灯盛, 等). Journal of Zhejiang A&F University(浙江农林大学学报)，2019, 36(5): 841.
[2] REN Fu-li, WANG Wen-long, YANG Guo-qing, et al(任富丽, 王文龙, 杨国庆, 等). Journal of Huzhou University(湖州师范学院学报)，2015, 37(9): 10.
[3] CHENG Ji, SUN Gen-yun, YAO Yan-juan, et al(程 吉, 孙根云, 姚延娟, 等). Yellow River(人民黄河)，2020, 42(12): 161.
[4] Xu W, Qin Y, Xiao X, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation，2018, 73：697.
[5] HUANG Shao-dong, XU Wei-heng, XIONG Yuan, et al(黄邵东, 徐伟恒, 熊 源, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2021, 41(8): 2565.
[6] XIONG Hao-li, ZHOU Xiao-cheng, WANG Xiao-qin, et al(熊皓丽, 周小成, 汪小钦, 等). Journal of Geo-Information Science(地球信息科学)，2021, 23(7): 1325.
[7] FAN Bin, CHEN Xu, LI Bi-cen, et al(范 斌, 陈 旭, 李碧岑, 等). Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程)，2017, 46(1): 16.
[8] LIAN Chen-qin, YAO Fo-jun, CHEN Mao-hong, et al(连琛芹, 姚佛军, 陈懋弘, 等). Geoscience(现代地质)，2020, 34(4): 680.
[9] MENG Xiang-tian, BAO Yi-lin, LIU Huan-jun, et al(孟祥添, 鲍依临, 刘焕军, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural E(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(18): 231.
[10] REN Guang-bo, ZHOU Li, LIANG Jian, et al(任广波, 周 莉, 梁 建, 等). Advances in Marine Science(海洋科学进展)，2021, 39(2): 312.
[11] SHEN Cong-ying, GAN Shu, LI Xin-ao, et al(沈聪颖, 甘 淑, 李新澳, 等). GNSS World of China(全球定位系统)，2021, 46(5): 117.
[12] Chen Y, Tian S. Forests, 2020, 11(12): 1357.
[13] Gong Z, Gu L, Ren R, et al. Proceedings of the Earth Observing Systems, 2020, 11501, 287.
[14] ZONG Ying, LI Yu-feng, LIU Hong-yu, et al(宗 影, 李玉凤, 刘红玉, 等). Journal of Nanjing Normal University(南京师范大学学报)，2021, 21(4): 47.
[15] LÜ Jie, HE Ning-yan, LI Chong-gui, et al(吕 杰, 赫宁燕, 李崇贵, 等). Remote Sensing Information(遥感信息), 2017, 32(6): 109.
[16] YANG Ying-gang, LIU Pei, ZHANG He-bing, et al(杨迎港, 刘 培, 张合兵, 等). Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing(航天返回与遥感)，2022, 43(2): 115.
[17] ZHANG Lei, GONG Zhao-ning, WANG Qi-wei, et al(张 磊, 宫兆宁, 王启为, 等). Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing(航天返回与遥感)，2019, 23(2): 313.
[18] LÜ Hai-tao, WU Wen-jun, LIAO Shen-xi, et al(吕海涛, 吴文君, 廖声熙, 等). Journal of Tea Science(茶叶科学)，2021, 41(2): 184.
[19] WAN L, LIN Y, ZHANG H, et al. Remote Sensing Information(遥感信息), 2020, 12(4): 656.
[20] GAO Hai-liang, GU Hang-fa, YU Tao, et al(高海量, 顾行发, 余 涛, 等). Remote Sensing Information(遥感信息), 2014, 29(3): 3.
[21] Xiang Y, Kang Q, Xu W, et al. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 141: 109132.
[22] HUANG Jian-wen, LI Zeng-yuan, CHEN Er-xue, et al(黄建文, 李增元, 陈尔学, 等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2021, 25(2): 539.
[23] WANG Zhou-long, FENG Xue-zhi, LIU Xiao-mei, et al(王周龙, 冯学智, 刘晓枚, 等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报)，2003, 7(2): 131.
[24] XU Wei-yan, SUN Rui, JIN-Zhi feng, et al(徐伟燕, 孙 睿, 金志凤, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural E(农业工程学报)，2016, 32(S1): 161.
[25] Tucker C J. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1979, 8(2): 127.
[26] LI Xu-sheng, LI HU, CHEN Dong-hua, et al(栗旭升, 李 虎, 陈冬花, 等). Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学)，2020, 56(10): 93.
[27] Breiman L. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5.
[28] Xu W, Huang S, Wu C, et al. Geocarto International, 2020, 37(7): 2116.
|
| [1] |
LI Xin-ting, ZHANG Feng, FENG Jie*. Convolutional Neural Network Combined With Improved Spectral
Processing Method for Potato Disease Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 215-224. |
| [2] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [3] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
| [4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
| [5] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
| [6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
| [8] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
| [9] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
| [10] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
| [11] |
ZHENG Shu-yuan1, 2, HAI Yan1, 2, HE Meng-qi1, 2, WANG Jian-xiong1, 2. Construction of Vegetation Index in Visible Light Band of GF-6 Image With Higher Discrimination[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3509-3517. |
| [12] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
| [13] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
| [14] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
| [15] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
|
|
|
|
