|
|
|
|
|
|
Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1* |
1. School of Information Science and Engineering, The Key Laboratory for Special Fiber and Fiber Sensor of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
2. Qinhuangdao Hongyan Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao 066004, China
|
|
|
Abstract The green tide is a kind of algal bloom phenomenon formed by the growth and aggregation of Marine macroalgae, which seriously affects the coastal ecological environment. Accurate monitoring of the coverage area of green tide is of great significance for preventing, monitoring and managing green tide disasters. The use of spectral methods for remote sensing monitoring has the advantages of non-contact, low cost and small loss, among which airborne hyperspectral remote sensing has a wide range of application prospects in the Marine field due to its advantages of high spectral and spatial resolution and more imaging channels. This study used DJI M300 RTK equipped with 410 Shark hyperspectral imaging system to collect data from the green algae outbreak area in The Dream of Bay, Qinhuangdao City. The collected spectral data were preprocessed to extract the spectral features of different ground objects. Based on the features, a spectral feature dataset with a capacity of 30 000 was constructed. The dataset was randomly divided into the training set and a test set, in which the training set accounted for 75% and the test set accounted for 25%. Five machine learning algorithms established the hyperspectral green tide inversion model, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, SVM, K-Nearest Neighbor and three-input voting classifier. The green algae coverage area in the green tide outbreak area was calculated by ground resolution cell (GRC) based on an airborne hyperspectral imaging system, and the classification accuracy of the inversion model was tested based on the in-dataset accuracy, Kappa coefficient and the preset standard area error verification method. The experimental results show that time can be saved by band selection first when the dichotomy of green algae pixels and other earth objects is performed on hyperspectral data and big data prediction is performed using the proposed classifier. The classification accuracy of the hyperspectral data can be effectively improved by logarithmic processing to enhance the differences between the spectra and then constructing the classifier model. The inversion accuracy of the hyperspectral green tide inversion model based on the three-input voting classifier of Random Forest, SVM and K-Nearest Neighbor is 98.95% in the dataset, and the Kappa coefficient is 0.978 9. The classification error obtained by the prespecified standard area error verification method is 6.06%. Applied through the experimental area of hyperspectral image prediction, it proved that the model in the prediction of big data still keeps high accuracy, and for the mixed pixels underwater algae pixels can also define, show that the method is feasible and superiorin the field of green tide remote sensing monitoring, in the field of green tide area monitoring has universality, has extensive application prospect in the field of marine monitoring.
|
Received: 2022-10-20
Accepted: 2023-06-28
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
FU Xing-hu
E-mail: fuxinghu@ysu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] BAI Yu, ZHAO Liang, LIU Jing-zhou(白 雨, 赵 亮, 刘境舟). Haiyang Xuebao (海洋学报), 2019, 41(8): 97.
[2] Liu D Y, John K K, He P M, et al. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2013, 129: 2.
[3] Ye N H, Zhang X W, Mao Y Z, et al. Ecological Research, 2011, 26(3): 477.
[4] FAN Shi-liang, FU Ming-zhu, LI Yan, et al(范士亮, 傅明珠, 李 艳, 等). Haiyang Xuebao(海洋学报), 2012, 34(6): 187.
[5] CHEN Ying, SUN De-yong, ZHANG Hai-long, et al(陈 莹, 孙德勇, 张海龙, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2020, 40(3): 0301001.
[6] LI Zhao-xin, QIU Zhong-feng, LI Xu-wen, et al(李兆鑫, 丘仲锋, 李旭文, 等). Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning(环境监控与预警), 2019, 11(5): 46.
[7] XING Qian-guo, ZHENG Xiang-yang, SHI Ping, et al(邢前国, 郑向阳, 施 平, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2011, 31(6): 1644.
[8] Wang M Q, Hu C M. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 183: 350.
[9] LIU Jin-chao, LIU Jian-qiang, DING Jing, et al(刘锦超, 刘建强, 丁 静, 等). Haiyang Xuebao(海洋学报), 2022, 44(5): 1.
[10] Xing Q G, Hu C M. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 178: 113.
[11] ZHANG Hai-long, SUN De-yong, LI Jun-sheng, et al(张海龙, 孙德勇, 李俊生, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2016, 36(6): 0601004.
[12] Jannoura R, Brinkmann K, Uteau D, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 129: 341.
[13] XU Fu-xiang, GAO Zhi-qiang, SHANG Wei-tao, et al(徐福祥, 高志强, 尚伟涛, 等). Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica(海洋与湖沼), 2018, 49(5): 1061.
[14] LI Dong-xue, GAO Zhi-qiang, SHANG Wei-tao, et al(李冬雪, 高志强, 尚伟涛, 等). Marine Environmental Science(海洋环境科学), 2020, 39(3): 438.
[15] ZHANG Chun-min, MU Ting-kui, YAN Ting-yu, et al(张淳民, 穆廷魁, 颜廷昱, 等). Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing(航天返回与遥感), 2018, 39(3): 104.
[16] MIAO Chun-li, FU Shuai, LIU Jie, et al(苗春丽, 伏 帅, 刘 洁, 等). Pratacultural Science(草业科学), 2022, 39(10): 1992.
[17] Ministry of Natural Resources, People's Republic of China(中华人民共和国自然资源部). HY/T 0331—2022, Technical Specifications for Ecological Survey and Monitor on Green Tide(绿潮生态调查与监测技术规范), 2002.
[18] LI Tong-ji(李铜基). China's Offshore Oceans-Ocean Optical Characteristics and Remote Sensing(中国近海海洋:海洋光学特性与遥感). Beijing: China Ocean Press(北京:海洋出版社),2012: 273.
|
[1] |
ZHU Wen-jing1, 2,FENG Zhan-kang1, 2,DAI Shi-yuan1, 2,ZHANG Ping-ping3,JI Wen4,WANG Ai-chen1, 2,WEI Xin-hua1, 2*. Multi-Feature Fusion Detection of Wheat Lodging Information Based on UAV Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 197-206. |
[2] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[3] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[5] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[6] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[7] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[8] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[9] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[10] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[11] |
FANG Zheng, WANG Han-bo. Measurement of Plastic Film Thickness Based on X-Ray Absorption
Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3461-3468. |
[12] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[13] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[14] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[15] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
|
|
|
|