无人机多光谱影像的小麦倒伏信息多特征融合检测研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)01-0197-10

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (35414 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to explore the applicability of the multi-feature fusion method in the fast and accurate identification of crop lodging, this study used UAVs to obtain wheat field multispectral data with different lodging rates at multi field canopy scales. The original lodging image is preprocessed by image mosaic, radiometric correction, geometric correction, etc., and the normalized difference vegetation index and shadow index are used to remove the soil and shadow background respectively. The wheat lodging DSM model and vegetation index were extracted and fused with the multispectral image for principal component transformation of the multi feature image, respectively, to screen the texture features with greater difference. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Maximum Likelihood (MLC) supervised classification models are used to classify multispectral and DSM fusion images, multispectral and normalized vegetation index (NDVI) fusion images, multispectral images and texture feature images. The overall accuracy (OA), Kappa coefficient and extraction error were used to comprehensively evaluate each supervision model's classification performance and lodging extraction accuracy. The classification results show that the modeling effect of each supervised classification method in different lodging areas is consistent, and the overall extraction accuracy of SVM and ANN is higher than that of MLC. In the high lodging areas, the SVM supervised model (OA: 92.63%, Kappa coefficient: 0.85, extraction error: 1.11%) of multispectral and NDVI fusion images has the best extraction effect; in the middle lodging area, the SVM supervision model (OA: 90.35%, Kappa coefficient: 0.79, extraction error: 9.34%) of multispectral and DSM fusion images has the best extraction effect; in the low lodging area, the ANN supervised model (OA: 91.05%, Kappa coefficient: 0.82, extraction error: 8.20%) of the mean texture feature image has a good extraction result. In this study, the DSM model, vegetation index, texture features and multi spectral images are fused and compared, and whether the multi feature fusion method can effectively extract wheat lodging information with high accuracy is explored. The results show that the UAV multi-spectral remote sensing method combined with feature fusion can effectively extract wheat lodging area, and the extraction effect is better than that of wheat lodging image with a single feature. The results of this study can provide a reference for the accurate acquisition method of the wheat lodging disaster survey data.

Key words：UAV remote sensing; Image processing; Multispectral; Feature fusion; Lodging; Wheat

Received: 2022-07-05 Accepted: 2022-10-25

ZTFLH:

S127

Corresponding Authors: WEI Xin-hua E-mail: wei_xh@126.com

Cite this article:

ZHU Wen-jing,FENG Zhan-kang,DAI Shi-yuan, et al. Multi-Feature Fusion Detection of Wheat Lodging Information Based on UAV Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 197-206.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)01-0197-10 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I01/197

[1] MENG Ling-zhi，GUO Xian-rui，LIU Hong-wei，et al（孟令志, 郭宪瑞, 刘宏伟）. Journal of Triticeae Crops（麦类作物学报），2014，34(12)：1720.
[2] Du X Y，Wan L，Cen H Y，et al. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation，2020，3(1)：7.
[3] LI Guang，ZHANG Li-yuan，SONG Chao-yang，et al（李广，张立元，宋朝阳，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报），2019，50(4)：211.
[4] HUANG Yan-wei，ZHU Hong-lei，GUO Ning-ge，et al（黄艳伟，朱红雷，郭宁戈，等）. Journal of Triticeae Crops（麦类作物学报），2021，41(2)：254.
[5] DAI Jian-guo，ZHANG Guo-shun，GUO Peng，et al（戴建国，张国顺，郭鹏，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2019，35(2)：63.
[6] Wilke N，Siegmann B，Klingbeil L，et al. Remote Sensing，2019；11(5)：515.
[7] Zhang Z，Flores P，Igathinathane C，et al. Rmote Sensing，2020：12(11)：1838.
[8] ZHAO Jing，PAN Fang-jiang，LAN Yu-bin，et al（赵静，潘方江，兰玉彬，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2021，37(3)：73.
[9] Yang Z W，Wu W B，Di L P，et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture，2017，16(2)：239.
[10] ZHANG Zhi-tao，ZHOU Yong-cai，YANG Shuai，et al（张智韬，周永财，杨帅，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报），2021，52(4)：197.
[11] LI Zong-nan，CHEN Zhong-xin，REN Guo-ye，et al（李宗南，陈仲新，任国业，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报），2016，32(2)：1.
[12] Chivasa W，Mutanga O，Burgueño J. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture，2021，184：106128.
[13] Patrick A，Pelham S，Culbreath A，et al. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine，2017：20：4.
[14] Huang L，Zhang H，Ruan C，et al. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2020，13(2)：182.
[15] Gitelson A A，Kaufman Y J，Merzlyak M N. Remote Sensing of Environment，1996，58(3)：289.
[16] Mahlein A K，Rumpf T，Welke P，et al. Remote Sensing of Environment，2013，128：21.
[17] Gitelson A，Merzlyak M N. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B-Biology，1994, 22(3)：247.