|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Different Particle Sizes on the Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content by Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1, 2, YANG Li1, 2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1, 2, CUI Tao1, 2, HE Xian-tao1, 2, DU Zhao-hui1, 2 |
1. College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Soil-Machine-Plant System Technology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
|
|
|
Abstract Soil organic matter is an important indicator that characterizes soil fertility information, and realizing its rapid and accurate detection can provide effective data support for precision agriculture regional management. The particle size of the soil has a great influence on the spectrum prediction of SOM content and instrument development. To analyze the impact of different particle sizes on SOM prediction, five soil samples with the uniform particle size of 1~2, 0.5~1, 0.25~0.5, 0.1~0.25, <0.1 mm, and mixed particle sizes of <1 mm were prepared, and the visible-near infrared (300~2 500 nm) spectral data was collected. Monte Carlo cross-validation was used to eliminate abnormal samples of different particle sizes, and the spectral data were smoothed and de-noised by the Savitzky-Golay convolution smoothing method. The spectral reflectance differences of samples with different particle sizes were compared, and three spectral transformations were performed on the smoothed original spectrum R, including reciprocal IR, logarithmic LR, and first derivative FDR. The correlation between SOM content and the reflectance of different transformed spectra was analyzed. The characteristic wavelength of the FDR transformed spectral data was extracted based on the Competitive Adaptive Reweighted Sampling (CARS) algorithm. Moreover, combined with the partial least squares regression (PLSR) to establish the corresponding prediction models of SOM content. The results show that the average spectral reflectance and coefficient of variation of soil samples with different particle sizes gradually increase with the decrease of particle size, and the difference is obvious in the wavelength range greater than 540 nm. With the decrease in particle size, the correlation between SOM content, particle size, and spectral reflectance in the whole band range become more obvious. FDR transformation can significantly change the correlation between SOM content and spectral reflectance. The CARS algorithm was used to extract the characteristic wavelengths from the FDR transformed spectral data, and the number of characteristic wavelengths was screened out and reduced to 13.1% of the total number of bands, which reduced the overlap of spectral data and the interference of invalid information. Comparing the results of different SOM prediction models, the FDR transformed spectrum had good modeling accuracy. Especially when the particle size was less than 0.1 mm, the model’s R2p, RMSEP and RPD value was 0.91, 2.20 g·kg-1, and 3.33. Among the SOM content prediction models constructed based on CARS characteristic variables, the prediction model with particle size <0.1 mm has the best effect. Its R2p reached 0.78, RMSEP was 3.00 g·kg-1, and RPD was 2.00, which can achieve reliable prediction of SOM content, and there is still room for optimization of models under other particle sizes. This research can provide a reference for the rapid and accurate prediction of SOM content in the field environment and the design of instruments.
|
Received: 2021-07-27
Accepted: 2021-08-23
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YANG Li
E-mail: yangli@cau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] YANG Li, YAN Bing-xin, ZHANG Dong-xing, et al(杨 丽, 颜丙新, 张东兴, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2016,47(11): 38.
[2] Ding Y, Yang L, Zhang D, et al. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2021, 14(2): 151.
[3] He X T, Ding Y Q, Zhang D X, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 162(7): 318.
[4] He X T, Ding Y Q, Zhang D X, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 162(7): 309.
[5] Pan G X, Smith P, Pan W N. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2009,129(1-3): 344.
[6] Oldfield E E, Bradford M A, Wood S A. Soil, 2019, 30(5): 1.
[7] Kodaira M, Shibusawa S. Geoderma, 2013, 199: 64.
[8] Hong Y S, Yu L, Chen Y Y, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10: 28.
[9] Lin Z D, Wang Y B, Wang R J, et al. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 2017, 84(3): 529.
[10] Gu X H, Wang Y C, Sun Q, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 167: 105053.
[11] Nawar S, Mouazen A M. Catena, 2017, 151: 118.
[12] Liu S S, Shen H H, Chen S C, et al. Geoderma, 2019, 348: 37.
[13] Dhawale N M, Adamchuk V I, Prasher S O, et al. European Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 66(4): 661.
[14] Mouazen A M, Kuang B, Baerdemaeker J D, et al. Geoderma, 2010, 158: 23.
[15] Dotto A C, Dalmolin R, Caten A T, et al. Geoderma, 2018, 314: 262.
[16] YU Lei, HONG Yong-sheng, GENG Lei, et al(于 雷, 洪永胜, 耿 雷, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2015, 31(14): 103.
[17] Sun Z Q, Zhang J Q, Tong Z J, et al. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, 2014, 133: 1.
[18] Nawar S, Buddenbaum H, Hill J, et al. Soil & Tillage Research, 2016, 155: 510.
[19] Rodionov A, Pätzold S, Welp G, et al. Soil & Tillage Research, 2016, 163: 89.
[20] Bao Y, Meng X, Ustin S, et al. Catena, 2020, 195: 104703.
[21] Knadel M, Thomsen A, Schelde K, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 114: 134.
[22] Gao L L, Zhu X C, Han Z Y, et al. Pedosphere, 2019, 29(6): 810.
[23] YU Lei, ZHU Ya-xing, HONG Yong-sheng, et al(于 雷, 朱亚星, 洪永胜, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(22): 138.
[24] LI Guan-wen, GAO Xiao-hong, XIAO Neng-wen, et al(李冠稳, 高小红, 肖能文, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2019, 39(9): 361.
|
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[3] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[4] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
[5] |
AN Bai-song1, 2, WANG Xue-mei1, 2*, HUANG Xiao-yu1, 2, KAWUQIATI Bai-shan1, 2. Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Lead Content Based on Random Frog Band Selection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3302-3309. |
[6] |
WU Yong-qing1, 2, TANG Na1, HUANG Lu-yao1, CUI Yu-tong1, ZHANG Bo1, GUO Bo-li1, ZHANG Ying-quan1*. Model Construction for Detecting Water Absorption in Wheat Flour Using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Combined With Multivariate Statistical #br#
Analyses[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2825-2831. |
[7] |
LIU Rui-min, YIN Yong*, YU Hui-chun, YUAN Yun-xia. Extraction of 3D Fluorescence Feature Information Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis Coupled With Wavelet Packet Energy for Monitoring Quality Change of Cucumber During Storage[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2967-2973. |
[8] |
KONG Bo1, YU Huan2*, SONG Wu-jie2, 3, HOU Yu-ting2, XIANG Qing2. Hyperspectral Characteristics and Quantitative Remote Sensing Inversion of Gravel Grain Size in the North Tibetan Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2381-2390. |
[9] |
TANG Ruo-han1, 2, LI Xiu-hua1, 2*, LÜ Xue-gang1, 2, ZHANG Mu-qing2, 3, YAO Wei2, 3. Transmittance Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fibre Content of
Living Sugarcane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2419-2425. |
[10] |
CAI Hai-hui1, ZHOU Ling2, SHI Zhou3, JI Wen-jun4, LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui5*. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter in Jujube Orchard
in Southern Xinjiang Using CARS-BPNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2568-2573. |
[11] |
XIA Chen-zhen1, 2, 3, JIANG Yan-yan4, ZHANG Xing-yu1, 2, 3, SHA Ye5, CUI Shuai1, 2, 3, MI Guo-hua5, GAO Qiang1, 2, 3, ZHANG Yue1, 2, 3*. Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Field of Black Soil Area Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2617-2626. |
[12] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[13] |
LIN Jing-tao, XIN Chen-xing, LI Yan*. Spectral Characteristics of “Trapiche-Like Sapphire” From ChangLe, Shandong Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1199-1204. |
[14] |
MAO Xiao-tian1, CHEN Chang2, YIN Zuo-wei1*, WANG Zi-min1. Spectra Characterization of Cr-Grossular (Tsavorite) With “Frogspawn” Color Zoning From Canada[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 520-525. |
[15] |
BAO Pei-jin1, CHEN Quan-li1, 2*, WU Yan-han1, LI Xuan1, ZHAO An-di1. Spectroscopy Characteristics of Emerald From Swat Valley, Pakistan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 213-219. |
|
|
|
|