|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Lead Content Based on Random Frog Band Selection Algorithm |
AN Bai-song1, 2, WANG Xue-mei1, 2*, HUANG Xiao-yu1, 2, KAWUQIATI Bai-shan1, 2 |
1. College of Geographic Science and Tourism of Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
2. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Key Laboratory “Xinjiang Arid Lake Environment and Resources Laboratory”, Urumqi
830054, China
|
|
|
Abstract Due to the large amount of redundant information in hyperspectral data, it greatly impacts the accuracy of hyperspectral estimation. The purpose of this study is to find the best algorithm for the screening of feature bands to realize the accurate monitoring of the lead content of heavy metals in soil and to provide a reference for soil pollution prevention and control. The lead contents and spectral data in the oasis soils of the Weigan-Kuqa river delta in Xinjiang were used as data sources, and 92 valid soil samples were identified using the Monte Carlo cross-validation algorithm (MCCV), and the spectral data processed by the first-order differential transformation of the reciprocal logarithm are selected through correlation analysis. The random frog (RF) algorithm is combined with the competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) algorithm. The iteratively retains informative variables (IRIV) algorithm and the successive projections algorithm (SPA). The RF-CARS, RF-IRIV and RF-SPA algorithms are constructed to screen the bands. Taking the reflectivity of feature bands as the independent variable and the content of heavy metal lead in the soil as the dependent variable, the extreme gradient boosting (XG Boost) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) methods were used to construct the estimation model of the lead content in the soil. The results show that: (1) The spectral transformation treatment can effectively enhance the sensitivity of the spectrum and lead content. The spectral characteristics after the first-order differential transformation of the reciprocal logarithm are obvious, and the correlation coefficient can reach 0.620 (p<0.001). (2) RF-CARS, RF-IRIV and RF-SPA algorithms extract 6, 9 and 7 feature bands from hyperspectral data, all located in the near-infrared spectral region. The three algorithms have strong feature extraction ability, greatly reducing redundant information in spectral data. (3) The accuracy and stability of the soil lead content estimation model constructed based on that the RF-IRIV algorithm are higher than those constructed by RF-CARS and RF-SPA, showing the RF-IRIV algorithm can more accurately retain the bands related to soil lead content. In addition, the performance of the GWR model is better than that of the XGBoost model, and the constructed RF-IRIV-GWR model has the good predictive ability, which can be used as the optimal estimation model for soil lead content in the study area. The R2, RMSE and RPD of the validation set of the RF-IRIV-GWR model are 0.892, 0.825 mg·kg-1 and 3.09 respectively. Based on the random frog (RF) and iteratively retains informative variables (IRIV) algorithm combined with geographically weighted regression (GWR) modeling method, it has certain advantages in quickly and accurately estimating soil lead content, which can be used for dynamic monitoring of soil heavy metal pollution.
|
Received: 2022-05-10
Accepted: 2022-10-31
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Xue-mei
E-mail: wangxm_1225@sina.com
|
|
[1] Liu Z, Lu Y, Peng Y, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(12): 1464.
[2] Wei L, Yuan Z, Yu M, et al. Sensors, 2019, 19(18): 3904.
[3] Tan K, Ma W, Chen L, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401: 123288.
[4] Jiang G, Zhou S, Cui S, et al. Sensors, 2020, 20(21): 6325.
[5] LIN Nan, LIU Han-lin, MENG Xiang-fa, et al(林 楠, 刘翰霖, 孟祥发, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2021, 52(3): 218.
[6] Wei L, Pu H, Wang Z, et al. Sensors, 2020, 20(14): 4056.
[7] MARHABA Turhun, MAMATTURSUM Eziz, WANG Wei-wei(麦尔哈巴·图尔贡, 麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜, 王维维). Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment(生态与农村环境学报), 2020, 36(12): 1626.
[8] CHENG Yong-sheng, ZHOU Yao(成永生, 周 瑶). The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals(中国有色金属学报), 2021, 31(11): 3450.
[9] LIU Yan-ping, LUO Qing, CHENG He-fa(刘彦平, 罗 晴, 程和发). Journal of Agro-Environment Science(农业环境科学学报), 2020, 39(12): 2699.
[10] XIAO Ye-hui, SONG Ni-di, MENG Pan-pan, et al(肖烨辉, 宋妮迪, 孟盼盼, 等). Remote Sensing for Natural Resources(自然资源遥感), 2021, 33(4): 143.
[11] Wei L, Yuan Z, Zhong Y, et al. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(9): 1943.
[12] FENG Shuai, CAO Ying-li, XU Tong-yu, et al(冯 帅, 曹英丽, 许童羽, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(8): 2584.
[13] Wu T, Yu J, Lu J, et al. Agriculture, 2020, 10(7): 292.
[14] JIA Ping-ping, SHANG Tian-hao, ZHANG Jun-hua, et al(贾萍萍, 尚天浩, 张俊华, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2020, 36(17): 125.
[15] GOU Yu-xuan, ZHAO Yun-ze, LI Yong, et al(勾宇轩, 赵云泽, 李 勇, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2022, 53(3): 331.
|
[1] |
ZHENG Pei-chao, YIN Yi-tong, WANG Jin-mei*, ZHOU Chun-yan, ZHANG Li, ZENG Jin-rui, LÜ Qiang. Study on the Method of Detecting Phosphate Ions in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum Combined With SPA-ELM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 82-87. |
[2] |
LI Xin-ting, ZHANG Feng, FENG Jie*. Convolutional Neural Network Combined With Improved Spectral
Processing Method for Potato Disease Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 215-224. |
[3] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[4] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[5] |
MENG Shan1, 2, LI Xin-guo1, 2*. Estimation of Surface Soil Organic Carbon Content in Lakeside Oasis Based on Hyperspectral Wavelet Energy Feature Vector[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3853-3861. |
[6] |
JIA Zong-chao1, WANG Zi-jian1, LI Xue-ying1, 2*, QIU Hui-min1, HOU Guang-li1, FAN Ping-ping1*. Marine Sediment Particle Size Classification Based on the Fusion of
Principal Component Analysis and Continuous Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3075-3080. |
[7] |
WU Yong-qing1, 2, TANG Na1, HUANG Lu-yao1, CUI Yu-tong1, ZHANG Bo1, GUO Bo-li1, ZHANG Ying-quan1*. Model Construction for Detecting Water Absorption in Wheat Flour Using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Combined With Multivariate Statistical #br#
Analyses[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2825-2831. |
[8] |
WANG Jing-yong1, XIE Sa-sa2, 3, GAI Jing-yao1*, WANG Zi-ting2, 3*. Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Chlorophyll Content in Sugarcane Leaves Under Stress of Mosaic[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2885-2893. |
[9] |
YAO Kun-shan1, SUN Jun1*, CHEN Chen2, XU Min1, CHENG Jie-hong1, ZHOU Xin1. Non-Destructive Identification for Panax Notoginseng Powder of Different Parts Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2027-2031. |
[10] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[11] |
ZHANG Chao1*, SU Xiao-yu1, XIA Tian2, YANG Ke-ming3, FENG Fei-sheng4. Monitoring the Degree of Pollution in Different Varieties of Maize Under Copper and Lead Stress[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1268-1274. |
[12] |
LIU Hong-jun1, NIU Teng1, YU Qiang1*, SU Kai2, YANG Lin-zhe1, LIU Wei1, WANG Hui-yuan1. Inversion and Estimation of Heavy Metal Element Content in Peach Forest Soil in Pinggu District of Beijing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3552-3558. |
[13] |
YANG Dong-feng1, LI Ai-chuan1, LIU Jin-ming1, CHEN Zheng-guang1, SHI Chuang1, HU Jun2*. Optimization of Seed Vigor Near-Infrared Detection by Coupling Mean Impact Value With Successive Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3135-3142. |
[14] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1,2, YANG Li1,2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1,2, CUI Tao1,2, HE Xian-tao1,2, DU Zhao-hui1,2. Prediction of Organic Matter Content in Sandy Fluvo-Aquic Soil by
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2924-2930. |
[15] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1, 2, YANG Li1, 2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1, 2, CUI Tao1, 2, HE Xian-tao1, 2, DU Zhao-hui1, 2. Effect of Different Particle Sizes on the Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content by Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2542-2550. |
|
|
|
|