|
|
|
|
|
|
| Optimization of Corn Stalk Liquefaction Conditions Under Atmospheric Pressure and Analysis of Biofuel |
| ZHANG Yan1, WANG Hui-le1, ZHAO Hui-fang1, LI Jing1, TONG Xin1, LIU Zhong2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Recycling and Eco-treatment of Waste Biomass of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
2. Tianjin Key Lab of Pulp & Paper, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the decline in the availability of petrochemical resources, lignocellulosic biomass as a renewable resource has been getting more and more attention. The atmospheric liquefaction technology has been used widely, which is one of the effective ways of biomass components utilization. In this paper, to optimize the liquefaction conditions, a single-factor method was used to study the effects of liquefaction temperature, mixing ratio of a compound liquefying agent, liquid-solid ratio, catalyst dosage and reaction time on the liquefaction yield of corn stalk. The thermo-gravimetric analyzer (TGA), gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were adopted to detect the volatile degradability and components of the biofuel. The results indicated that the optimum conditions were determined as liquefaction temperature 170 ℃, diethylene glycol (DEG)/1,2-propanediol (PG)=1∶2, a liquid to solid ratio of 5∶1, phosphoric acid dosage 10% and reaction time 45 min. Under this condition, the liquefaction yield was up to 99.50%. The results of TGA showed that the biofuel contained more than 80% of compounds with a carbon number less than 25, and the final carbon content after pyrolysis was about 15%. GC-MS presented that 39 kinds of organic compounds were tested in biofuel, among which alcohols were the most, phenols were the second, and their relative contents were 70.70% and 25.63%, respectively. There were also some organic acids (2.80%), ethers (0.64%), esters (0.10%) and ketones (0.13%). Its components were complicated, and high oxygen content, so its stability was limited. 1H- and 13C-NMR explained that different chemical shifts δ corresponded to different types of protons and carbon atoms. The distribution of hydrogen and carbon in the biofuel was clarified, conducive to the further exploration of its molecular structure. Hence, theoretical foundation and technical support could be provided for the existing related liquefaction technology and then promote the efficient utilization of biomass resources and the development of biomass-based products.
|
|
Received: 2021-06-22
Accepted: 2021-10-09
|
|
|
|
[1] Breunig M, Gebhart P, Hornung U, et al. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2018，111：352.
[2] Ogo S, Okuno Y, Sekine H, et al. Chemistry Select, 2017, 2(22)：6201.
[3] LI Xue-qin, WANG Zhi-wei, LI Xiang-yu, et al(李学琴，王志伟，李翔宇，等). Henan Science(河南科学), 2019, 37(4): 51.
[4] Nizamuddin S, Baloch HA, Mubarak NM, et al. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2019, 10(7): 1957.
[5] Zhang Y, Liu Z, Hui L F, et al. Bioresources, 2018, 13(3): 6818.
[6] ZHANG Yan, LIU Zhong, HUI Lan-feng(张 妍，刘 忠，惠岚峰). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(5): 1517.
[7] Biswas B, Bisht Y, Kumar J, et al. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2020，12(1)：91.
[8] Xu Y, Liu K, Hu Y, et al. Fuel, 2020, 279: 118412.
[9] ZHOU Yu, AN Zhen(周 宇，安 珍). Journal of Northeast Forestry University(东北林业大学学报), 2015, 43(10): 109.
[10] Hab A, Mths A, Sn A, et al. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 148: 1060.
[11] LI Yong-fei, ZHAO Wei, CHEN Gang, et al(李永飞，赵 巍，陈 刚，等). Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs(复杂油气藏), 2015, 8(4): 69.
[12] WU Li-jun, PI Zhong-yuan, WANG Ye-min(武立俊，皮中原，王烨敏). China Coal(中国煤炭), 2018, 44(1): 94.
[13] Suet Pin F, Sarani Z, Chin Hua C, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(3): 3521.
[14] Zhang Y, Liu Z, Liu H T, et al. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2019, 215: 170.
[15] Singh R, Balagurumurthy B, Prakash A, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 178: 157.
[16] Yan X, Wang B, Zhang J. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 197: 120. |
| [1] |
KAN Yu-na1, LÜ Si-qi1, SHEN Zhe1, ZHANG Yi-meng1, WU Qin-xian1, PAN Ming-zhu1, 2*, ZHAI Sheng-cheng1, 2*. Study on Polyols Liquefaction Process of Chinese Sweet Gum (Liquidambar formosana) Fruit by FTIR Spectra With Principal Component Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1212-1217. |
| [2] |
ZHANG Yan1, 2, WANG Hui-le1, LIU Zhong2, ZHAO Hui-fang1, YU Ying-ying1, LI Jing1, TONG Xin1. Spectral Analysis of Liquefaction Residue From Corn Stalk Polyhydric
Alcohols Liquefaction at Ambient Pressure[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 911-916. |
| [3] |
JIN Wang-jun1, 2, LI Yan1, 2, ZHAO Yue3, MEI Sheng-hua1*. In Situ Raman Study and Kinetic Analysis of Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Glycine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3448-3453. |
| [4] |
LI Yan1,2, WEI Dan1, 2*, WANG Wei3, JIN Liang2, DING Jian-li2, CAI Shan-shan4, HU Yu1, BAI Yang1. Fluorescence Spectroscopy Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter Analysis of Straw-Cow Dung Fermentation in Different Proportion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2846-2852. |
| [5] |
ZHANG Yan, LIU Zhong*, HUI Lan-feng. Study on the Polyhydric Alcohol Liquefaction of Corn Stalk under Atmospheric Pressure and Analysis of Liquefied Products[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(05): 1517-1523. |
| [6] |
LIU Jin-ming1, 2, CHU Xiao-dong1, WANG Zhi1, XU Yong-hua3, LI Wen-zhe1, SUN Yong1*. Optimization of Characteristic Wavelength Variables of Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Detecting Contents of Cellulose and Hemicellulose in Corn Stover[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(03): 743-750. |
| [7] |
SONG Yong-hui, MA Qiao-na, HE Wen-jin, TIAN Yu-hong, LAN Xin-zhe. A Comparative Study on the Pyrolysis Characteristics of Direct-Coal-Liquefaction Residue Through Microwave and Conventional Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(04): 1313-1318. |
| [8] |
ZHANG Juan1, LIU Hai-tang1, 2, LIU Zhong1*, JIANG Qi-fan1 . Catalytic Liquefaction of Corn Stalk under Atomosphere Prssure and the Analysis of Liquefaction Products [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(10): 3243-3248. |
| [9] |
SONG Yong-hui, MA Qiao-na, HE Wen-jin, LAN Xin-zhe . Regularity of Gaseous Product Release During Direct Coal Liquefaction Residue Pyrolysis Process [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(07): 2017-2021. |
| [10] |
ZHU Zhi-qiang1, YUAN Hong-fu1*, HU Ai-qin1, SONG Chun-feng1, LI Xiao-yu1, WU Ming-qing2 . Study on the Fast Quantitative Analysis of the Content of DME Adulterated in LPG[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(04): 978-980. |
| [11] |
FAN Wen-jun, WU Mei-xiang, HAO Jian-shu, FENG Jie*, LI Wen-ying . A Quick Quantitative Analysis for Group Composition of Coal Liquefaction Oil by Ultraviolet Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(07): 1938-1943. |
| [12] |
SUN Xiang-ping1, 2, LI Guo-xue2*, XIAO Ai-ping1, SHI Hong2, WANG Yi-ming2, LI Yang-yang2 . Analysis on the Impact of Composting with Different Proportions of Corn Stalks and Pig Manure on Humic Acid Fractions and IR Spectral Feature [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(09): 2413-2418. |
| [13] |
WANG Zhi-cai, CUI Xue-ping, SHUI Heng-fu, WANG Zu-shan, LEI Zhi-ping, KANG Shi-gang . Fluorescence Spectroscopy Characterization of Asphaltene Liquefied from Coal and Study of Its Association Structure [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 30(06): 1530-1534. |
| [14] |
ZOU Xian-wu1, YANG Zhi2, QIN Te-fu1* . FTIR Analysis of Products Derived from Wood Liquefaction with 1-Octanol[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2009, 29(06): 1545-1548. |
| [15] |
ZHOU Ji-guo1,LIU Gang1*,LIU Jian-hong2,SONG Ding-shan3,SHI Yong-ming1 . Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Study of Coprinus Comatus[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2008, 28(02): 321-323. |
|
|
|
|
