光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Feasibility Study on Quantitative Analysis of Sulfide Concentration and pH of Marine Sediment Pore Water via Raman Spectroscopy |
TIAN Zhi-xian1, 3, ZHANG Xin1*, LIU Chang-ling2, MENG Qing-guo2, YAN Jun1 |
1. Institute of Oceanology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 266071,China 2. Key Laboratory of Gas Hydrate,Ministry of Land and Resources,Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology,Qingdao 266071,China 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China |
|
|
Abstract Marine sediment pore water is one of the important objects in the study of global environmental change, marine geology and biogeochemistry. Anoxic pore waterin highly reducing deep-sea sediments commonly contains a large amount of dissolved sulfide (H2S and HS-). The sulfide species within sediment pore water are significant not only because the importance of themselves, but also because they exist as a function of pH which is another key parameter in pore water study. As degassing and chemical equilibrium altering are both inevitable, concentrations of sulfide species and pH value of marine sediment pore water acquired with traditional non-in situ technologies are of great uncertainty, and cannot represent the real geochemistry information. However, the recent deployment of an in situ laser Raman pore water sampler allows us to observe spectral sulfide signals of marine sediments in situ and in real time, which provide us a new technique to solve this problem. Sulfide species in water have a relatively strong Raman signal, which often appears in the form of a characteristic overlapping peak between 2 550~2 620 cm-1 and can be decomposed into HS- at 2 572 cm-1 and H2S at 2 592 cm-1. In the present paper, quantitative analysis ofH2S and HS- with Raman spectroscopy is proved practicableand the accuracy is good. The pH of pore water is an important influencing factor of the diagenetic processes. As H2S and HS- are conjugate acid-base pairs, sulfide specieswithin pore water exist as a function of pH and their concentration ratio depend on pH. This relationship is also shown in the Raman spectrum. To formulate thepore water pH calculation, sulfide solutions with pH range from 6.11 to 13.05were prepared and their Raman spectra were observed. It is verified that the morphology of overlapping peaks change regularly with pH values. This phenomenon provides us the possibility of measuring the pH of pore water in situ via Raman spectroscopy. Based on peaks decomposition and correlativity analysis, we proposehere a novel in situ pH measuring method for sediment pore water containing sulfide. This method can be used to measure the pH of pore water when the overlapping peak of sulfide is resolvable. The application scope of this pH measuring method in this study is 6.11~8.32, which covers almost all pH value of marine sediment pore water already known. The study provides additional technical reference for obtaining high-fidelity information of marine sediment pore water.
|
Received: 2014-05-13
Accepted: 2014-09-12
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Xin
E-mail: xzhang@qdio.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Van Dongen B E, Roberts A P, Schouten S, et al. Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta, 2007, 71(21): 5155. [2] Mazumdar A, Peketi A, Joao H M, et al. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014, 49: 162. [3] Fossing H, Ferdelman TG, Berg P. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2000, 64(5): 897. [4] Regnier P, Dale AW, Arndt S, et al. Earth-Science Reviews, 2011, 106(1-2): 105. [5] Hensen C, Zabel M, Pfeifer K, et al. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2003, 67(14): 2631. [6] Reeburgh W S. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(2): 486. [7] Paull C K, Ussler III W. Geophysical Monograph Series, 2001, 124:53. [8] Zhang X, Kirkwood W J, Walz P M, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2012, 66(3): 237. [9] Duan Z, Sun R, Liu R, et al. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(4): 2056. [10] Nagy P, Pálinkás Z, Nagy A, et al. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta(BBA)-General Subjects, 2014, 1840(2): 876. [11] Wopenka B, Pasteris JD. Analytical Chemistry, 1987, 59(17): 2165. [12] Sun Q. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2009, 51(2): 213. [13] Boiron M-C, Moissette A, Cathelineau M, et al. Chemical Geology, 1999, 154(1): 179. [14] Po H N, Senozan N. Journal of Chemical Education, 2001, 78(11): 1499. [15] Jourabchi P, Meile C, Pasion LR, et al. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2008, 72(5): 1350. |
[1] |
LI Jie, ZHOU Qu*, JIA Lu-fen, CUI Xiao-sen. Comparative Study on Detection Methods of Furfural in Transformer Oil Based on IR and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 125-133. |
[2] |
WANG Fang-yuan1, 2, HAN Sen1, 2, YE Song1, 2, YIN Shan1, 2, LI Shu1, 2, WANG Xin-qiang1, 2*. A DFT Method to Study the Structure and Raman Spectra of Lignin
Monomer and Dimer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 76-81. |
[3] |
XING Hai-bo1, ZHENG Bo-wen1, LI Xin-yue1, HUANG Bo-tao2, XIANG Xiao2, HU Xiao-jun1*. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Channel Sensing Detection of Pyrene in
Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 95-102. |
[4] |
WANG Xin-qiang1, 3, CHU Pei-zhu1, 3, XIONG Wei2, 4, YE Song1, 3, GAN Yong-ying1, 3, ZHANG Wen-tao1, 3, LI Shu1, 3, WANG Fang-yuan1, 3*. Study on Monomer Simulation of Cellulose Raman Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 164-168. |
[5] |
WANG Lan-hua1, 2, CHEN Yi-lin1*, FU Xue-hai1, JIAN Kuo3, YANG Tian-yu1, 2, ZHANG Bo1, 4, HONG Yong1, WANG Wen-feng1. Comparative Study on Maceral Composition and Raman Spectroscopy of Jet From Fushun City, Liaoning Province and Jimsar County, Xinjiang Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 292-300. |
[6] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[7] |
WANG Zhi-qiang1, CHENG Yan-xin1, ZHANG Rui-ting1, MA Lin1, GAO Peng1, LIN Ke1, 2*. Rapid Detection and Analysis of Chinese Liquor Quality by Raman
Spectroscopy Combined With Fluorescence Background[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3770-3774. |
[8] |
LIU Hao-dong1, 2, JIANG Xi-quan1, 2, NIU Hao1, 2, LIU Yu-bo1, LI Hui2, LIU Yuan2, Wei Zhang2, LI Lu-yan1, CHEN Ting1,ZHAO Yan-jie1*,NI Jia-sheng2*. Quantitative Analysis of Ethanol Based on Laser Raman Spectroscopy Normalization Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3820-3825. |
[9] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[10] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[11] |
LIN Hong-jian1, ZHAI Juan1*, LAI Wan-chang1, ZENG Chen-hao1, 2, ZHAO Zi-qi1, SHI Jie1, ZHOU Jin-ge1. Determination of Mn, Co, Ni in Ternary Cathode Materials With
Homologous Correction EDXRF Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3436-3444. |
[12] |
GUO He-yuanxi1, LI Li-jun1*, FENG Jun1, 2*, LIN Xin1, LI Rui1. A SERS-Aptsensor for Detection of Chloramphenicol Based on DNA Hybridization Indicator and Silver Nanorod Array Chip[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3445-3451. |
[13] |
HUANG Li, MA Rui-jun*, CHEN Yu*, CAI Xiang, YAN Zhen-feng, TANG Hao, LI Yan-fen. Experimental Study on Rapid Detection of Various Organophosphorus Pesticides in Water by UV-Vis Spectroscopy and Parallel Factor Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3452-3460. |
[14] |
ZHU Hua-dong1, 2, 3, ZHANG Si-qi1, 2, 3, TANG Chun-jie1, 2, 3. Research and Application of On-Line Analysis of CO2 and H2S in Natural Gas Feed Gas by Laser Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3551-3558. |
[15] |
LIU Jia-ru1, SHEN Gui-yun2, HE Jian-bin2, GUO Hong1*. Research on Materials and Technology of Pingyuan Princess Tomb of Liao Dynasty[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3469-3474. |
|
|
|
|