|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulation of Airflow Performance and Parameter Optimization of
Photoacoustic Cell Based on Orthogonal Test |
CHENG Gang1, CAO Ya-nan1, TIAN Xing1, CAO Yuan2, LIU Kun2 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines (Anhui University of Science and Technology), Huainan 232001, China
2. Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
|
|
|
Abstract Photoacoustic spectroscopy gas detection technology is the most typical application of photoacoustic technology. Compared with other methods, photoacoustic gas detection technology has the advantages of a simple structure, wavelength free detector, zero background noise and low cost. This technology has been widely used in various fields. The photoacoustic cell is the core component of the photoacoustic spectrum gas detection system, and its performance greatly impacts the detection results. At present, the optimization of the photoacoustic cell is mainly carried out under static conditions, and there are few reports on the gas flow performance and dynamic time response in the photoacoustic cell cavity. Because the gas disturbance and system detection noise of the photoacoustic cell under dynamic detection conditions have a certain impact, the relevant parameters of the photoacoustic cell are further explored and optimized to improve the gas flow field distribution in the photoacoustic cell cavity. Dynamic pressure characteristics and gas concentration equilibrium time are of great significance to improve the gas detection performance of photoacoustic spectroscopy. Therefore, based on the traditional cylindrical photoacoustic cell, the steady-state and transient simulation models of the flow field in the photoacoustic cell cavity are established based on the three-dimensional flow field numerical simulation method, and the gas flow field distribution and gas concentration balance response law in the photoacoustic cell cavity are calculated. The results show that reducing the flow velocity in the photoacoustic cell and optimizing the transition structure in the photoacoustic cell will improve the dynamic pressure fluctuation caused by the flow and shorten the gas concentration regulation time in the cavity. Taking the five parameters of the transition corner between the buffer cavity and the resonator of the photoacoustic cell, the number of auxiliary holes, the radius of the auxiliary hole, the radius of the center circle of the auxiliary hole and the air inlet speed as factors, and taking the dynamic pressure value at the midpoint of the resonator axis and the gas concentration adjustment time as inspection indexes, the method of combining numerical simulation, orthogonal experimental design and entropy weight method is adopted, The primary and secondary order of the influence of the relevant parameters of the photoacoustic cell on the dynamic pressure value is obtained as follows: the radius of the auxiliary hole>the number of auxiliary holes>air inlet speed>transition fillet>the radius of the center circle of the auxiliary hole; The primary and secondary order of influence on the adjustment time is: inlet speed>auxiliary hole radius>number of auxiliary holes=auxiliary hole center circle radius>transition fillet. In order to balance the influence of indicators, this paper transforms the multi-objective parameter optimization problem into a single objective optimization problem. It objectively gives the weight of dynamic pressure value as 0.49 and the weight of adjustment time as 0.51 respectively. Within the range of parameters studied in this paper, the best combination of parameters is obtained: the circle at the transition between the buffer cavity and the resonator is 3.0 mm, the number of auxiliary holes is 8, the radius of auxiliary holes is 3.5 mm, the radius of the center circle of auxiliary holes is 22.5mm, the air inlet speed is 0.06 m·s-1, the dynamic pressure value at the midpoint of the axis of the optimized photoacoustic cell resonator is 9.4×10-4 Pa, and the gas concentration adjustment time in the cavity is 141 s. Compared with the indicators before the optimization of the photoacoustic cell, the dynamic pressure value is relatively reduced by 88.1%, and the adjustment time is relatively reduced by 17.5%. Both indicators have been optimized and improved, and the optimization effect is relatively ideal. The research methods and conclusions can provide important references for photoacoustic cell optimization design and expansion.
|
Received: 2022-07-03
Accepted: 2022-10-17
|
|
|
[1] Kost B, Baumann B, Germer M, et al. Applied Physics B, 2011, 102(1): 87.
[2] Haouari R, Rochus V, Lagae L, et al. Topology Optimization of an Acoustical Cell for Gaseous Photoacoustic Spectroscopy Using COMSOLD○R Multiphysics, Proceedings of the 2017 COMSOL Conference in Rotterdam, 2017.
[3] Lassen M, Balslev-Harder D, Brusch A, et al. Applied Optics, 2018, 57(4): 802.
[4] CHENG Gang, CAO Yuan, LIU Kun, et al(程 刚,曹 渊,刘 锟,等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2019, 68(7): 139.
[5] CHENG Gang, CAO Ya-nan, TIAN Xing, et al(程 刚,曹亚南,田 兴,等). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2021, 50(2): 200.
[6] Zhang C, Wang Q, Yin X. Optics Communications, 2021, 487: 126764.
[7] LI Ze-hao, YANG Chun-yong, TANG Zi-hao, et al(李泽昊,杨春勇,唐梓豪,等). Chinese Journal of Lasers(中国激光), 2021, 48(1): 186.
[8] Liu L, Huan H, Mandelis A, et al. Optics & Laser Technology, 2022, 148: 107695.
[9] SHI Qiang, HU Shui-ming, CHEN Jun, et al(史 强,胡水明,陈 军,等). Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics(化学物理学报), 1998, 11(1): 20.
[10] ZHAO Jun-juan, ZHAO Zhan, DU Li-dong, et al(赵俊娟,赵 湛,杜利东,等). Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators(传感技术学报), 2012, 25(3): 289.
[11] Jiao Y, Fan H, Gong Z, et al. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(11): 4997.
[12] Zhao N, Zhao D, Ma L, et al. Analytical Methods, 2022, 14(15): 157.
[13] YU Xin,LI Zhen-gang,LIU Jia-xiang, et al(于 欣,李振钢,刘家祥,等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2021, 41(16): 120.
[14] Yin X, Wu H, Dong L, et al. ACS Sensors, 2020, 5(2): 549.
[15] Ma Y, Qiao S, He Y, et al. Optics Express, 2019, 27(10): 14163.
[16] DING Shu-ye, XIA Lei, LIU Jian-feng, et al(丁树业,夏 垒,刘建峰,等). Journal of Harbin University of Science and Technology(哈尔滨理工大学学报), 2018, 23(6): 57.
[17] LIU Qiang, NIU Ming-sheng, WANG Gui-shi, et al(刘 强,牛明生,王贵师,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2013, 33(7): 1729.
[18] WANG Yong-ming, LI Wei, TAN Li-bin, et al(汪永明,李 偎,谈莉斌,等). Forging & Stamping Technology(锻压技术), 2021, 46(12): 46.
|
[1] |
ZHENG Hong-quan, DAI Jing-min*. Research Development of the Application of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Measurement of Trace Gas Concentration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 1-14. |
[2] |
XU Qiu-yi1, 3, 4, ZHU Wen-yue3, 4, CHEN Jie2, 3, 4, LIU Qiang3, 4 *, ZHENG Jian-jie3, 4, YANG Tao2, 3, 4, YANG Teng-fei2, 3, 4. Calibration Method of Aerosol Absorption Coefficient Based on
Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 88-94. |
[3] |
FU Wen-xiang, DONG Li-qiang, YANG Liu*. Research Progress on Detection of Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants and Toxic Gases by Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3653-3658. |
[4] |
LIU Pan1, 2, 3, DU Mi-fang1*, LI Bin1, LI Jing-bin1, ZENG Lei1, LIU Guo-yuan1, ZHANG Xin-yao1, 4, ZHA Xiao-qin1, 4. Determination of Trace Tellurium Content in Aluminium Alloy by
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3125-3131. |
[5] |
CHEN Tu-nan1, 2, LI Kang1, QIU Zong-jia1, HAN Dong1, 2, ZHANG Guo-qiang1, 2*. Simulation Analysis and Experiment Verification of Insulating Material-Based Photoacoustic Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2922-2927. |
[6] |
JIN Hua-wei1, 2, 3, WANG Hao-wei1, 2, LUO Ping1, 2, FANG Lei1, 2. Simulation Design and Performance Analysis of Two-Stage Buffer
Photoacoustic Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2375-2380. |
[7] |
LI Zhen-gang1, 2, SI Gan-shang1, 2, NING Zhi-qiang1, 2, LIU Jia-xiang1, FANG Yong-hua1, 2*, CHENG Zhen1, 2, SI Bei-bei1, 2, YANG Chang-ping1, 2. Research on Long Optical Path and Resonant Carbon Dioxide Gas
Photoacoustic Sensor[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 43-49. |
[8] |
JIANG Xiao-gang1, ZHU Ming-wang1, YAO Jin-liang1, LI Bin1, LIAO Jun1, LIU Yan-de1*, ZHANG Jian-yi2, JING Han-song2. Research on Parameter Optimization of Apple Sugar Model Based on Near-Infrared On-Line Device[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 116-121. |
[9] |
WANG Qi, WANG Shi-chao, LIU Tai-yu, CHEN Zi-qiang. Research Progress of Multi-Component Gas Detection by Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 1-8. |
[10] |
REN Zhong1, 2*, LIU Tao1, LIU Guo-dong1, 2. Classification and Identification of Real or Fake Blood Based on OPO Pulsed Laser Induced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2734-2741. |
[11] |
WAN Liu-jie1, 2, ZHEN Chao3, QIU Zong-jia1, LI Kang1, MA Feng-xiang3, HAN Dong1, 2, ZHANG Guo-qiang1, 2*. Research of High Precision Photoacoustic Second Harmonic Detection Technology Based on FFT Filter[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 2996-3001. |
[12] |
CHEN Jie1, 2, 3, QIAN Xian-mei1, 3, LIU Qiang1, 3*, ZHENG Jian-jie1, 2, 3, ZHU Wen-yue1, 3, LI Xue-bin1, 3. Research on Optical Absorption Characteristics of Atmospheric Aerosols at 1 064 nm Wavelength[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 2989-2995. |
[13] |
XIE Ying-chao1,2, WANG Rui-feng1,2, CAO Yuan1,2, LIU Kun1*, GAO Xiao-ming1,2. Research on Detecting CO2 With Off-Beam Quartz-Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy at 2.004 μm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2664-2669. |
[14] |
CHENG Gang1, CAO Ya-nan1, TIAN Xing1, CAO Yuan2, LIU Kun2*. Influence of Photoacoustic Cell Geometrical Shape on the Performance of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2345-2351. |
[15] |
WANG Qiao-yun, YIN Xiang-yu, YANG Lei, XING Ling-yu. Geometrical Optimization of Resonant Ellipsoidal Photoacoustic Cell in Photoacoustic Spectroscopy System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(05): 1351-1355. |
|
|
|
|