|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Rapid Detection of Flunixin Meglumine Residues in Pork |
ZHANG Qian, DONG Xiang-hui, YAO Wei-rong, YU Hang, XIE Yun-fei* |
College of Food, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214000, China
|
|
|
Abstract Flunixin meglumine (FM) is the only animal-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and it is the most commonly used anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug in veterinary clinics. In recent years, with the expansion of its application scope, its adverse reactions gradually appeared, and the residues of Flunixin meglumine in animal meat gradually attracted people’s attention and attention. The current detection methods of FM include liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography. However, this method has disadvantages such as expensive equipment, cumbersome and complicated operation, which is highly unfavourable for rapid on-site detection. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) has the advantages of portability, rapid detection, fingerprint recognition, etc., which can overcome the chromatographic technology brought by on-site detection. Because of the inconvenience, it has been widely used in the rapid screening and detection of veterinary drug residues in recent years. Therefore, in order to realize the rapid detection of FM in pork, a rapid detection method of levamisole residues in pork by SERS was established. The gold sol was prepared by reducing potassium chloroaurate with sodium citrate. Through a single factor experiment, it was determined that when the volume ratio of sample to gold gel was 1∶3, the pH of the sample was 6, and no coagulant was added, the detection effect was the best. Combining density functional theory to calculate theoretical spectra, compare theoretical calculation spectra with solid Raman spectra, assigning vibration modes to characteristic peaks. Among them, the pyridine ring and benzene ring swing at 731, 1 085 and 1 376 cm-1 are C—H vibration on the benzene ring. After optimizing the extraction pretreatment method and the selection of extractant, a qualitative and quantitative detection method for FM in pork was established under the best detection conditions. In this method, the characteristic peaks of FM in the pork matrix are 731, 1 085 and 1 376 cm-1. Choose 731 cm-1 as the qualitative and quantitative peak, where the Raman intensity and the FM concentration have a good linear relationship within 1~250 mg·L-1, and R2 is 0.99. The actual concentration of the spiked samples was tested, the recovery rate was 89.61%~95.63%, and the RSD was 1.80%~3.30%. The method is simple, fast and stable in operation, and is beneficial to the rapid on-site detection of FM residues in pork.
|
Received: 2021-04-09
Accepted: 2022-01-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XIE Yun-fei
E-mail: xieyunfei@jiangnan.edu.cn
|
|
[1] WANG Hong-lei, LIU Yi-ming, WU Lian-yong,et al(王宏磊, 刘义明, 吴连勇,等). Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine(中国兽医杂志), 2019, 55(1): 44.
[2] XU Chuan-lai, LIN Lu, KUANG Hua, et al (胥传来, 林 璐, 匡 华,等). CN201710285176. X.[P], 2017.
[3] ZHAO Huan-huan, PAN Yuan-hu, WANG Xiang-ru, et al(赵欢欢, 潘源虎, 王湘如,等). Progress in Veterinary Medicine(动物医学进展), 2020, 41(2): 114.
[4] MENG Fang, ZHENG Li, LIN Hong, et al(孟 芳, 郑 莉, 林 红,等). Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug(中国兽药杂志), 2018, 52(05): 56.
[5] LUO Xiao-qing, ZHANG Zhen-rui, GUO Fan-xi, et al(罗小清, 张珍瑞, 郭凡溪,等). Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(南京农业大学学报), 2017, 40(6): 1105.
[6] Fathalla F Belal, Sawsan A Abd El-Razeq, et al. Analytical Chemistry Research, 2015, 3: 63.
[7] Carmen Igualada, Francisco Moragues, Jorge Pitarch. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2007, 586(1-2): 432.
[8] Hanan A Merey, Mahmmoud S Abd-Elmonem, Hagar N Nazlawy, et al. Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, 2017, 2017: 2321572.
[9] Lin Lu, Jiang Wei, Xu Liguang, et al. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 2018, 29(1): 193.
[10] ZHAI Chen, LI Yong-yu, PENG Yan-kun, et al(翟 晨, 李永玉, 彭彦昆,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2017, 33(7): 275.
[11] Shao Di, Bi Shuyun, Zhao Rui. Sensors and Actuators: B, 2020, 37: 127644.
[12] XU Ning, LIU Mu-hua, YUAN Hai-chao, et al(徐 宁, 刘木华, 袁海超,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(3): 924.
|
[1] |
HU Yu-xia1, CHEN Jie1, SHAO Hui1, YAN Pu1, XU Heng1, SUN Long1, XIAO Xiao1, XIU Lei3, FENG Chun2GAN Ting-ting2, ZHAO Nan-jing2*. Research Progress of Spectroscopy Detection Technologies for Waterborne Pathogens[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2672-2678. |
[2] |
LIU Shi-jie1, ZHU Yao-di1, 2, LI Miao-yun1, 2*, ZHAO Gai-ming1, 2, ZHAO Li-jun1, 2, MA Yang-yang1, 2, WANG Na1. Raman Spectroscopic Characteristic Structure Analysis and Rapid Identification of Food-Borne Pathogen Spores Based on SERS Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2774-2780. |
[3] |
DONG Xiang-hui, YANG Fang-wei, YU Hang, YAO Wei-rong, XIE Yun-fei*. Papid Detection of Zilpaterol Residues in Pork by Surface-Enhanced
Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2843-2847. |
[4] |
GE Deng-yun, XU Min-min, YUAN Ya-xian*, YAO Jian-lin*. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Investigation on the Effect of
Solution pH on Dehydroxylation of Hydroxythiophenol Isomers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2076-2081. |
[5] |
FU Qiu-yue1, FANG Xiang-lin1, ZHAO Yi2, QIU Xun1, WANG Peng1, LI Shao-xin1*. Research Progress of Pathogenic Bacteria and Their Drug Resistance
Detection Based on Surface Enhanced Raman Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1339-1345. |
[6] |
FU Ying-ying, ZHANG Ping, ZHENG Da-wei , LIN Tai-feng*, WANG Hui-qin, WU Xi-hao, SONG Jia-chen. Preparation and SERS Performance of Au-Nylon Flexible Membrane Substrate[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 692-698. |
[7] |
SONG Hong-yan, ZHAO Hang, YAN Xia, SHI Xiao-feng, MA Jun*. Adsorption Characteristics of Marine Contaminant Polychlorinated Biphenyls Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 704-712. |
[8] |
ZHANG Lin1, WEN Bao-ying2, LIU Wei-wei1, FU Wen-xiang1, KONG Jing-lin1*, LI Jian-feng2*. Rapidly Detection of Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 110-114. |
[9] |
XU Yang1, LEI Lei2, YAN Jun1*, CHEN Yu-yun1, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Yu-qian1, WANG Qi3. Determination of Glutaraldehyde in Water by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Based on Metal Organic Framework Composite Substrate[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 115-123. |
[10] |
SHI Si-qian, YANG Fang-wei, YAO Wei-rong, YU Hang, XIE Yun-fei*. Rapid Detection of Levamisole Residue in Pork by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3759-3764. |
[11] |
QIU Meng-qing1, 2, XU Qing-shan1*, ZHENG Shou-guo1*, WENG Shi-zhuang3. Research Progress of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Pesticide Residue Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3339-3346. |
[12] |
TAN Ai-ling1, ZHAO Rong1, SUN Jia-lin1, WANG Xin-rui1, ZHAO Yong2*. Detection of Chlorpyrifos Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3462-3467. |
[13] |
WANG Run-yu1, DONG Da-ming1,2, YE Song1*, JIAO Lei-zi1,2. Measurement of Volatile Compounds Released From Plastic Using[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3039-3044. |
[14] |
ZHANG Yan-jun, KANG Cheng-long, LIU Ya-qian, FU Xing-hu*, ZHANG Jin-xiao, WANG Ming-xue, YANG Liu-zhen. Rapidly Detection of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus Content in Water by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and GWO-SVR Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3147-3152. |
[15] |
JIN Xiang-peng, LI Xing-jia, ZHANG Chen-jie, YUAN Ya-xian, YAO Jian-lin*. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Investigation on SPR Catalyzed Decarboxylation of Ortho-Mercaptobenzoic Acid at Au Nanoparticles Monolayer Film[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3153-3158. |
|
|
|
|