盐湖卤水中硼酸盐化学形态及Raman光谱定量分析

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)09-2514-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3859 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Qinghai-Tibet salt lakes are famous for enriching boron and lithium resources. Nevertheless, the chemical species of borate in the brine varies with the chemical type of salt lake. Among them, the existing borate forms in sulfate-type salt lake brine are the most complicated. Generally, the borates do not crystallize out from the brine during the whole evaporation process of brine but accumulate in the bischofite-saturated brine in different kinds of boron species, which are supersaturated with magnesium borates. This phenomenon may significantly impact the subsequent separation and extraction of lithium and magnesium salts. Therefore, the deep research on the chemical forms, species distribution, and their interactions in the salt lake brine is of great significance for the highly efficient development of salt lake resources. Compared with the classical Raman spectroscopy, the simplified Raman integrating sphere, designed based on the Raman scattering principle, can improve the exciting light's efficiency and the Raman scattering signal. It is characteristic of a strong Raman scattering signal, low detection limit, and high signal-to-noise ratio for the characterization of the borate structures, which favors the quantitative analysis of the chemical forms of the borate in the complicated brine system. Based on the above, this study aimed to investigate the chemical forms of borate in salt lake brine using the Raman integrating spheres. It also elucidated the changes of polyborate ions during the brine evaporation process. Secondly, the response surface method was used to explore the effects of the coexisting salts on the determination of B(OH)₃ in salt lake brine. The results showed that borates in the salt lake brine could be polymerized to form poly borate ions such as B₃O₃(OH)^-₄ and B₆O₇(OH)^2-₇ during the brine evaporation process, which agreed well with the borate changes in the alkaline-earth metal solution system of MgCl₂-MgO-2B₂O₃-H₂O, but differed greatly with that changes in alkaline metal solutions. The relative error of the B(OH)₃ determination in brine was less than 5% after being corrected by the response surface interference model. Therefore, the distribution of B(OH)₃ in the brine was also studied during the evaporation process, which helped explain the polymerization mechanism among borate ions in brine from a quantitative perspective. In sum, this research could provide new ideas and methods for further study of borate speciation and their interaction mechanism in complicated brine systems.

Key words：Salt lake brine;Borates;Response surface method;Raman spectra;Quantitative analysis

Received: 2023-05-26 Accepted: 2023-12-08

ZTFLH:

O657.61

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)09-2514-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I09/2514

[1] GAO Shi-yang，SONG Peng-sheng，XIA Shu-ping，et al（高世扬，宋彭生，夏树屏，等）. Salt Lake Chemistry—New Type Borate Salt Lake（盐湖化学—新类型硼锂盐湖）. Beijing：Science Press（北京：科学出版社），2007.
[2] GAO Shi-yang，XIA Shu-ping（高世扬，夏树屏）. Chemistry（化学通报），1999，(12)：12.
[3] Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes，Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院青海盐湖研究所）. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院院刊），2017，32(7)：788.
[4] MA Pei-hua，GUO Yong-nan（马培华，郭永楠）. Chinese Patent（中国专利）: 201510505563.0，2017.
[5] Hirao T，Kotaka M，Kakihana H. Journal of Inorganic & Nuclear Chemistry，1979，41(8)：1217.
[6] Fang C H，Fang Y，Zhou Y Q，et al. Journal of Salt Lake Research，2019，27(2)：11.
[7] ZHANG Wen-qian，FANG Chun-hui，ZHU Fa-yan，et al（张文倩，房春晖，朱发岩，等）. Journal of Salt Lake Research（盐湖研究），2019，26(4)：51.
[8] Zhu F Y，Miao J T，Zhou Y Q，et al. Journal of Solution Chemistry，2021，50(1)：19.
[9] Zhou Y Q，Higa S，Fang C H，et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics，2017，19(40)：927878.
[10] Ge H W，Fang Y，Fang C H，et al. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data，2014，59：4039.
[11] Ge H W，Wang M，Zhou Y Q，et al. Physical Chemistry of Solutions，2019，93(8)：1478.
[12] Felmy A R，Weare，J H. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta，1986，50(12)：2771.
[13] Li D，Zhou G L，Gu S S，et al. ACS Omega，2020，5(26)：15835.
[14] Li D，Fu Q T，Zhang T，et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology，2020，9(6)：13067.
[15] Fu Q T，Chen L L，Song X H，et al. Journal of Chemistry，2020，2020：6687742.
[16] Li D，Meng L Z，Liu X L，et al. Physical Chemistry of Solutions，2020，94(3)：570.
[17] Peng J Y，Chen J，Dong Y P，et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A，2018，199：367.
[18] Li J，Xia S P，Gao S Y. Spectrochimica Acta Part A，1995，51(4)：367.
[19] JIA Yong-zhong，GAO Shi-yang，XIA Shu-ping，et al（贾永忠，高世扬，夏树屏，等）. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry（无机化学学报），2001，17(3)：383.
[20] Peng J Y，Chen J，Wang X P，et al. Journal of Salt Lake Research，2019，27(2)：85.
[21] WANG Pei-jun（王培君）. Geology of Chemical Minerals（化工矿产地质），1996，18(2)：139.
[22] Spessard J E. Journal of Inorganic & Nuclear Chemistry，1970，32(8)：2607.