基于ReliefF算法的钛合金电弧增材沉积层尺寸与光谱特性的相关性分析

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)07-2002-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (11508 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Arc additive manufacturing has the advantages of high deposition efficiency, low cost, and unrestricted deposition shape and size. However, the dimensional accuracy of the formed parts by arc additive manufacturing is still difficult to guarantee accurately. The size of the deposited layer is one of the criteria for evaluating the quality of component formation, and it is crucial for judging processing quality and defect compensation. Therefore, real-time monitoring of the variation of the deposited layer size during the arc additive manufacturing process is of great significance for optimizing process parameters and ensuring the formation quality of additive manufacturing components. Arc spectral information can reflect the arc state, closely related to the forming quality. Therefore, studying the relationship between arc spectrum and deposited layer size is very important. This study used titanium alloy (TC4) material as the substrate and welding wire, and the arc plasma spectral signals were studied to investigate the correlation between GTAW additive arc spectral characteristics and deposited layer size. Firstly, a spectral acquisition system was constructed to collect arc spectral signals at different positions above the molten pool, around the molten pool, and below the tungsten electrode. Secondly, based on the principle of high spectral line separation, the wavelengths of 404.20 nm TiⅠ spectral line, 416.36 nm TiⅡ spectral line, 420.20, 434.81, 480.50, and 487.98 nm ArⅡ spectral lines, and 696.54 and 794.82 nm ArⅠ spectral lines were selected. The peak intensity features of these spectral lines were extracted, and the ReliefF algorithm was used to explore the correlations between different spectral line intensity features and deposited layer size. The results showed that among all the spectral lines, the peak intensity features of the 404.03 nm TiⅠ element spectral line, 416.36 nm TiⅡ element spectral line, and 794.82 nm ArⅠ element spectral line above the molten pool had a strong correlation with the deposited layer size. At the same time, combining the ReliefF algorithm, the correlations between peak intensity features of different positions and deposited layer size were studied. The results showed that the spectral line with the strongest correlation between the molten pool above and the deposited layer size was the 696.54 nm ArⅠ spectral line, and the spectral line with the strongest correlation between the molten pool around and below the tungsten electrode and the deposited layer size was the 794.82 nm ArⅠ spectral line. Furthermore, to reduce random errors, the PCA algorithm was used to fuse the intensity features corresponding to the three spectral lines with the highest correlation with the deposited layer size, and a new fusion feature was obtained. Then, combining the K-nearest neighbors algorithm, a deposited layer size prediction model was established. The fused feature and the feature values of samples with the highest correlation with the deposited layer size at different positions were extracted, and the accuracy of predicting the sample's category based on these four features was calculated. The results showed higher accuracy for predicting the deposited layer size based on the fused feature. Finally, based on this new feature, combined with the threshold segmentation method, dynamic monitoring of the variation of the deposited layer size was achieved.

Key words：Arc spectrum;Feature selection;Character merger;ReliefF

Received: 2023-08-21 Accepted: 2024-03-19

ZTFLH:

TG403

Cite this article:

XIAO Xiao,WANG Xue-qing,ZHANG Chi, et al. Correlation Analysis Between the Size and Spectral Characteristics of Titanium Alloy Arc Additive Deposition Layer Based on ReliefF Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(07): 2002-2010.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)07-2002-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I07/2002

[1] HUANG Jian-kang, WU Hao-sheng, YU Xiao-quan, et al(黄健康, 吴昊盛, 于晓全, 等). Material Reports(材料学报), 2023, (14): 1.
[2] HUANG Qiu-shi, LI Liang-qi, GAO Bin-bin(黄秋实, 李良琦, 高彬彬). Defense Manufacturing Technology(国防制造技术), 2012, (5): 26.
[3] Mereddy S, Bermingham M J, StJohn D H, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 695: 2097.
[4] Wu B, Pan Z, Ding D, et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2018, 35: 127.
[5] Davis A E, Breheny C I, Fellowes J, et al. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2019, 765: 138289.
[6] DONG Chun-lin, TAN Jin-hong, LIN Zhi-cheng, et al(董春林, 谭锦红, 林志成, 等). Metal Working(金属加工), 2020，(7): 16.
[7] NI Cheng, ZHU Ke-yu, FAN Ji-kang, et al(倪程, 朱科宇, 范霁康, 等). Welding & Joining(焊接), 2022, (1): 1.
[8] LI Jun-yue, SONG Yong-lun, LI Huan, et al(李俊岳, 宋永伦, 李桓, 等). Transactions of the China Welding Institution(焊接学报), 2002(6): 5.
[9] ZHANG Zhi-fen, YANG Zhe, REN Wen-jing, et al(张志芬, 杨哲, 任文静, 等). Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2019, 40(1): 19.
[10] Chen B, Yao Y, Tan C, et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 96(9-12): 4231.
[11] Yu H, Ye Z, Chen S. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 68(9): 2713.
[12] Zhang C, Gao M, Chen C, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 30: 100869.
[13] Tanaka M, Tsujimura Y, Yamazaki K, et al. Welding in the World，2021, 56(1-2): 30.
[14] Hu Y, Chen H, Liang X, et al. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 64: 851.
[15] LIU Ning, FAN Cheng-lei, YANG Chun-li, et al(刘宁, 范成磊, 杨春利, 等). Welding & Joining(焊接), 2013，(6): 30.
[16] Zhang Z F, Yu H W, Lv N, et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2013, 213(7): 1146.
[17] Zhang Z F, Yang Z, Ren W J, et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2019, 42: 51.
[18] MA Jing-ying, XUAN Heng-nong(马晶莹, 宣恒农). Computer Applications and Software(计算机应用与软件), 2017, 34(7): 298.
[19] WU Chen-wen, LI Chen-yang, GUO Shu-jin, et al(吴辰文, 李晨阳, 郭叔瑾, 等). Application Research of Computers(计算机应用与研究), 2018, 35(9): 2610.
[20] WANG You-rong, WANG Zhen-wei, et al(王友荣, 王振威, 等). Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics(液压与气动), 2015, (12): 18.
[21] YU Zhong-bin, ZHANG Lin, LI Shuo, et al(于忠斌, 张林, 李硕, 等). FAMEN(阀门), 2021，(6): 323.
[22] GU Ying-kui, YANG Zi-qian, ZHU Fan-long(古莹奎, 杨子茜, 朱繁泷). China Mechanical Engineering(中国机械工程), 2015，(11): 1532.