|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on the Classification Method of Benthic Fauna Based on
Hyperspectral Data and Random Forest Algorithm |
DONG Jian-jiang1, TIAN Ye1, ZHANG Jian-xing2, LUAN Zhen-dong2*, DU Zeng-feng2* |
1. College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
2. Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment & Center of Deep Sea Research, Institute of Oceanology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
|
|
|
Abstract This study aims to identify underwater benthic animals in situ, use random forest algorithm to achieve recognition classification detection, classify and identify target organisms for analysis, dig deeper into the data, and improve efficiency and reliability of decision making. The hyperspectral data of five common economic animals (scallop, ctenophore, veined red snail, wrinkled disc abalone, and imitation spiny ginseng) in different underwater environments were acquired, normalized and processed using random forest (Random Forest, RF) in machine learning, random forest based on principal component analysis method (Principal Component Analysis-Random Forest, PCA-RF), and random forest based on recursive feature elimination method (Recursive feature elimination- Random Forest, RFE-RF). Three random forest algorithms were used to classify five benthic species and for comparative analysis. By ranking the importance of the variables of RF, the reflection spectrum intensity data corresponding to the bands with higher ranking and higher contribution to the model were filtered. Then the top-ranked feature band data were input into the classifier, and the classification accuracy was obtained by optimizing the parameters. The classification results of the data were output to the confusion matrix, and the identification of the five samples could be seen. The lowest recognition accuracy of 64% was obtained for the veined red snail sample; the highest recognition accuracy of 100% was obtained for imitation spiny ginseng and ctenophore scallops; the recognition accuracies of 91% and 96% were obtained for the scallop and wrinkled disc abalone, respectively. The final classification accuracies of the three methods were 90.13% for RF, 95.20% for PCA-RF, and 98.74% for RFE-RF, which showed the feasibility of using the random forest algorithm in the classification of underwater hyperspectral data.
|
Received: 2022-09-14
Accepted: 2023-03-31
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LUAN Zhen-dong, DU Zeng-feng
E-mail: luan@qdio.ac.cn;duzengfeng@qdio.ac.cn
|
|
[1] SUN Dong-yang, LIU-Hui, ZHANG Ji-hong, et al(孙东洋, 刘 辉, 张纪红, 等). Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica(海洋与湖沼), 2021, 52(5): 1160.
[2] Li Chongyi, Guo Jichang, Cong Runmin, et al. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016, 25(12): 5664.
[3] Barat Christian, Phlypo Ronald. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2010, 2010: 512767.
[4] Redmon Joseph, Divvala Santosh, Girshick Ross, et al. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, 779.
[5] Jaffe J S. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2014, 40(3): 683.
[6] Johnsen Sönke. Scientific American, 2000, 282(2): 80-89.
[7] Reed Irving, Yu Xiaoli. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1990, 38(10): 1760.
[8] Zhao Chunhui, Yao Xifeng. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 15(11): 1760.
[9] CHANG Chein-I, CAO Hong-ju, Song Meiping. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14: 4915.
[10] Geng Xiurui, Yang Weitun, Ji Luyan, et al. Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 8(7): 696.
[11] Mohite J, Karale Y, Pappula S, et al. Proc SPIE, 2017, 10217: 102170P.
[12] Adam E M, Mutanga O, Rugege D, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 33(2): 552.
[13] Belgiu Mariana, Drǎguţ Lucian. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2016, 114: 24.
[14] Fonseca G A, Ferreira D D, Costa F B, et al. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 2022, 33(2): 598.
[15] Breiman Leo. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5.
[16] Ho Tin Kam, Random Decision Forests, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. IEEE, 1995, 278.
[17] Goldstein Benjamin Alan, Polley Eric, Farren B S Briggs. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2011, 10(1): 32(doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1691).
[18] Díaz-Uriarte Ramón, Alvarez de Andrés Sara. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006, 7(1): doi: 10.1186/1471-1105-7-3.
[19] Vincenzi Simone, Zucchetta Matteo, Franzoi Piero, et al. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222(8): 1471.
[20] Dye Michelle, Mutanga Onisimo, Ismail Riyad. Geocarto International, 2011, 26(4): 275.
|
[1] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[2] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[3] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[4] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[5] |
YAN Xing-guang, LI Jing*, YAN Xiao-xiao, MA Tian-yue, SU Yi-ting, SHAO Jia-hao, ZHANG Rui. A Rapid Method for Stripe Chromatic Aberration Correction in
Landsat Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3483-3491. |
[6] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[7] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
[8] |
LI Zhong-bing1, 2, JIANG Chuan-dong2, LIANG Hai-bo3, DUAN Hong-ming2, PANG Wei2. Rough and Fine Selection Strategy Binary Gray Wolf Optimization
Algorithm for Infrared Spectral Feature Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3067-3074. |
[9] |
JIA Zong-chao1, WANG Zi-jian1, LI Xue-ying1, 2*, QIU Hui-min1, HOU Guang-li1, FAN Ping-ping1*. Marine Sediment Particle Size Classification Based on the Fusion of
Principal Component Analysis and Continuous Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3075-3080. |
[10] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
[11] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[12] |
WEI Zi-kai, WANG Jie, ZHANG Ruo-yu, ZHANG Meng-yun*. Classification of Foreign Matter in Cotton Using Line Scan Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3230-3238. |
[13] |
SUN Bang-yong1, YU Meng-ying1, YAO Qi2*. Research on Spectral Reconstruction Method From RGB Imaging Based on Dual Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2687-2693. |
[14] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
[15] |
YANG Sen1, ZHANG Xin-ao1, XING Jian1, DAI Jing-min2. Study on Multi-Feature Model Fusion Variety Classification and Multi-Parameter Appearance Inspection for Milled Rice[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2837-2842. |
|
|
|
|