|
|
|
|
|
|
| Research on Inverse Recognition of Space Target Scattering Spectral
Image |
| JIANG Chun-xu1, 2, TAN Yong1*, XU Rong3, LIU De-long4, ZHU Rui-han1, QU Guan-nan1, WANG Gong-chang3, LÜ Zhong1, SHAO Ming5, CHENG Xiang-zheng5, ZHOU Jian-wei1, SHI Jing1, CAI Hong-xing1 |
1. School of Physics, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
2. Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng 137000, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics, Xi'an 710043, China
4. Changchun Observatory of National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130117, China
5. Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Countermeasure Test and Evaluation Technology，Luoyang 471000, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Because the space target is far away from the ground and the atmospheric medium strongly scatters the scattered light signal, it is difficult to get the accurate information of the target in ground-based measurement. In recent years, the rapid development of spectral observation technology has provided a new method for measuring space targets. However, it is difficult to distinguish the target directly from the spectral curve in the collected target spectral information because the target orbital height and material composition are mostly similar. Therefore, based on the bidirectional reflection distribution function (BRDF) scattering theory, the scattering spectral imaging model of space target is established. A group of geosynchronous(GEO) targets were experimentally measured by a 1.2 m aperture ground-based observation platform and spectral video imaging system. The spectral range is 400 to 720 nm, and the spectral resolution is 2 nm. A radial basis neural network algorithm is used to unmix the BRDF in spectral data. The BRDF of six typical materials for space targets is measured experimentally. Because the target is relatively far away, it has exceeded the diffraction limit of the detection system so that the target can be regarded as a point target. However, in ground-based measurements, the atmosphere is an important barrier between the detection system and the target. The target light signal will be strongly scattered by the atmospheric medium when passing through the atmosphere. This scattering greatly attenuates the light signal, but at simultaneously the light signal is amplified according to its original structure. According to the optical memory effect, the structure of the target optical signal remains unchanged after passing through the uniform atmospheric medium. Based on the above analysis, the target spot image in measurement should retain the information of the target projection structure. Therefore, a method of segmentation inversion for the texture region of the target light spot image is used to divide the target light spot into 10 texture regions and extract the corresponding spectral data. Through the transfer function calibration and noise reduction processing of the detection system, the spectral curve of the space geometry angle of the orbiting target in the observation period is obtained. Then the typical material spectral database is used for fitting inversion. The results show that the material types in texture areas No.2, No.5 and No.10 are different from other areas. At the same time, the material area ratio of each texture area is different. To further evaluate the fitting results, a non-singular matrix was used to evaluate the fitting effect, and the disturbance equation was analyzed. The highest fitting accuracy was 85.283 3, and the lowest was 76.982 7. It shows that the fitting results are relatively real. Target speckle image contains distinguishable target projection structure information. This study provides a new direction for detecting point target imaging and speckle image structure recognition.
|
|
Received: 2022-06-06
Accepted: 2022-08-21
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
TAN Yong
E-mail: laser95111@126.com
|
|
[1] XU Can, ZHANG Ya-sheng, ZHAO Yang-sheng, et al(徐 灿，张雅声，赵阳升, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(3): 672.
[2] Kaufman J R, Eismann M T, Celenk M. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015，8(6): 2534.
[3] Jing N, Li C, Zhong P F. Optical Engineering, 2017. 56(1): 014107.
[4] Yu H, Li E R, Gong W L, et al. Optics Express, 2015，23(11): 14541.
[5] Liu L Z, Zhang Y Z, Li Z D, et al. Nature Photonics, 2020，15(2): 137.
[6] Yin J, Li Y H, Liao S K, et al. Nature, 2020，582(7813): 501.
[7] Antipa N, Kuo G, Heckel R, et al. Optica, 2018, 5(1): 1.
[8] Faccio D, Velten A, Wetzstein G. Nature Reviews Physics, 2020, 2(6): 318.
[9] Katz O, Small E, Silberberg Y. Nature Photonics, 2012, 6(8): 549.
[10] Popoff S M, Lerosey G, Carminati R, et al. Physical Review Letters, 2010, 104(10): 100601.
[11] Judkewitz B, Horstmeyer R, Vellekoop I M, et al. Nature Physics, 2015, 11(8): 684.
[12] Ruan H, Xu J, Yang C. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1.
[13] YANG Hong, HUANG Yong-hui, GONG Chang-mei（杨 虹，黄远辉，龚昌妹）. Chinese Optics(中国光学), 2014，7(1): 1.
[14] Li W, Xi T, He S, et al. Optics Letters, 2021, 46(18): 4538.
[15] Akhlaghi M I, Dogariu A. Optica, 2017, 4(4): 447.
[16] Li X, Greenberg J A, Gehm M E. Optica, 2019, 6(7): 864.
[17] Xie X, Zhuang H, He H, et al. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 4585.
[18] ZHU Lei, SHAO Xiao-peng(朱 磊, 邵晓鹏). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2020，40(1): 83.
[19] Gilliam C, Dragotti P L, Brookes M. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2014, 23(2): 502.
[20] Liu Y, Chang M, Xu J. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 121486.
[21] Liu Y, Dai J, Zhao S, et al. Optik, 2020, 219: 164978.
[22] Ye Y, Tan Y, Jin G Y, et al. Optics Express, 2019，27(11): 16360.
[23] Han Y, Lin L, Sun H, et al. Optik, 2015, 126(15-16): 1474.
[24] JIN Xiao-long, TANG Yi-jun, SUI Cheng-hua(金小龙，唐轶峻，隋成华). Opto-Electronic Engineering(光电工程), 2013, 40(12): 44.
[25] Li Q, Shi S, Wu K. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 2018, 85(5): 909.
|
| [1] |
JIANG Chuan-li1, ZHAO Jian-yun1, 2*, DING Yuan-yuan1, ZHAO Qin-hao1, MA Hong-yan1. Study on Soil Water Retrieval Technology of Yellow River Source Based on SPA Algorithm and Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1961-1967. |
| [2] |
LI Zhi1, WANG Xia1*, XU Can1*, LI Peng2, HUO Yu-rong1, FU Jing-yu1, WANG Pei1, FENG Fei3. Review of Spectral Characterization and Identification of Unresolved Space Objects[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1329-1339. |
| [3] |
LAI Si-han1, LIU Yan-song1, 2, 3*, LI Cheng-lin1, WANG Di1, HE Xing-hui1, LIU Qi1, SHEN Qian4. Study on Hyperspectral Inversion of Rare-Dispersed Element Cadmium Content in Lead-Zinc Ores[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1275-1281. |
| [4] |
DENG Shi-yu1, 2, LIU Cheng-zhi1, 4*, TAN Yong3*, LIU De-long1, ZHANG Nan1, KANG Zhe1, LI Zhen-wei1, FAN Cun-bo1, 4, JIANG Chun-xu3, LÜ Zhong3. A Combination of Multiple Deep Learning Methods Applied to Small-Sample Space Objects Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 609-615. |
| [5] |
DENG Shi-yu1，2, LIU Cheng-zhi1，4*, TAN Yong3*, LIU De-long1, JIANG Chun-xu3, KANG Zhe1, LI Zhen-wei1, FAN Cun-bo1，4, ZHU Cheng-wei1, ZHANG Nan1, CHEN Long1，2, NIU Bing-li1，2, LÜ Zhong3. Research on Spectral Measurement Technology and Surface Material Analysis of Space Target[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3299-3306. |
| [6] |
SHEN Qiang1, ZHANG Shi-wen2*, GE Chang2, LIU Hui-lin2, ZHOU Yan3, CHEN Yuan-peng3, HU Qing-qing2, YE Hui-chun4*, HUANG Yuan-fang5. Hyperspectral Inversion of Heavy Metal Content in Soils Reconstituted by Mining Wasteland[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1214-1221. |
| [7] |
XU Rong1, 2, ZHAO Fei1, 2, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2. Progress of Spectral Measurements and Characterization for Non-Resolved Space Objects[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(02): 333-339. |
| [8] |
LI Peng1, LI Zhi2, XU Can3, FANG Yu-qiang2, ZHANG Feng1. Research on Space Object’s Materials Multi-Color Photometry Identification Based on the Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(02): 363-369. |
| [9] |
XU Can1, ZHANG Ya-sheng1, ZHAO Yang-sheng1, LI Peng2 . Advances in Spectroscopic Characters of Space Objects [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(03): 672-678. |
| [10] |
LI Qing-bo, WU Ke-jiang，GAO Qi-shuo . Research on Space Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Spectral Information[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(12): 4067-4071. |
| [11] |
TENG Jing1, 2, 3, HE Zheng-wei1, 2, 3*, NI Zhong-yun2, 4, ZHAO Yin-quan2, 4, ZHANG Zhi1, 2, 3 . Spectral Response and Inversion Models for Prediction of Total Copper Content in Soil of Xifanping Mining Area [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(11): 3637-3642. |
| [12] |
WU Ming-zhu1, LI Xiao-mei1*, SHA Jin-ming2*. Spectral Inversion Models for Prediction of Total Chromium Content in Subtropical Soil[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(06): 1660-1666. |
| [13] |
LUAN Fu-ming1, 2, ZHANG Xiao-lei1, 2*, XIONG Hei-gang3, 4, ZHANG Fang4, WANG Fang1, 2 . Comparative Analysis of Soil Organic Matter Content Based on Different Hyperspectral Inversion Models [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(01): 196-200. |
| [14] |
NI Jun-xiong1, BAI Ting-zhu1*, XU Ying-ying1，2 . The Research on Multi-Spectral Fitting of LED Spectrum Tunable Light Source [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 32(06): 1606-1610. |
| [15] |
Lü Jin-guang1, 2, LIANG Jing-qiu1*, LIANG Zhong-zhu1 . Study on Spectrum Inversion of Spatially Modulated Fourier Transform Spectrometer [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 32(06): 1694-1699. |
|
|
|
|
