|
|
|
|
|
|
| Application of Principal Component Analysis in Processing of Time-Resolved Infrared Spectra of Greenhouse Gases |
| WANG Yu-hao1, 2, LIU Jian-guo1, 2, XU Liang2*, DENG Ya-song2, SHEN Xian-chun2, SUN Yong-feng2, XU Han-yang2 |
1. School of Environmental Science and Optoelectronic Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences，Hefei 230031, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy enables simultaneous measurement of the concentrations of various greenhouse gas components. However, instrument noise and spectral line overlap can affect the quality of spectroscopic data, thereby influencing the accuracy of component concentration inversion. In this study, we address this issue by reconstructing the time-resolved measurement spectroscopic matrix using different numbers of principal components. The Euclidean and cosine distances between the reconstructed and original spectroscopic matrices are employed as criteria for dynamically selecting the number of principal components, thus enhancing the quality of time-resolved spectroscopic data. The proposed method is applied to numerical simulation spectra, standard gas measurement spectra, and field experiment spectra. The results show that the structure characteristics of the simulated spectra, with an additional 0.001 RMS noise, remain essentially unchanged after spectral reconstruction. The residual standard deviation between the reconstructed and original spectra is 4.191×10-4, effectively reducing the impact of noise in the measurement spectra. The method is further utilized to reconstruct the average measurement spectra of standard gases, and the accuracy of component concentration inversion between the reconstructed and average spectra is compared. The precision of component concentration inversion for 1-minute average measurement spectra is as follows: CO2: 0.24 μmol·mol-1, CH4: 5.24 nmol·mol-1, N2O: 2.92 nmol·mol-1, and CO: 4.72 nmol·mol-1. Similarly, for 5-minute average measurement spectra, the precision is: CO2: 0.24 μmol·mol-1, CH4: 5.24 nmol·mol-1, N2O: 2.92 nmol·mol-1, and CO: 4.72 nmol·mol-1. The precision of component concentration inversion for 1-minute reconstructed spectra is: CO2: 0.17 μmol·mol-1, CH4: 2.97 nmol·mol-1, N2O: 0.72 nmol·mol-1, and CO: 1.40 μmol·mol-1. For 5-minute reconstructed spectra, the precision is: CO2: 0.15 μmol·mol-1, CH4: 1.74 nmol·mol-1, N2O: 0.29 nmol·mol-1, and CO: 0.97 nmol·mol-1. Utilizing reconstructed spectra improves the accuracy of gas concentration inversion, with the precision of component concentration inversion for 5-minute reconstructed spectra meeting the requirements of the World Meteorological Organization/Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO/GAW) for extended measurement accuracy. In field experiments, the correlation coefficient between the concentration of CO2 obtained from 1-minute reconstructed spectra and that from 1-minute average spectra reaches 89.40%. The comprehensive analysis demonstrates that the dynamic selection of principal components for FTIR time-resolved spectroscopic data reduces the influence of noise and effectively preserves the characteristic variation information of time-resolved measurement spectra.
|
|
Received: 2022-06-20
Accepted: 2023-05-15
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XU Liang
E-mail: xuliang@aiofm.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Lan X, Thoning K, Dlugokencky E. Laboratory Measurements: Version, 2023, 6: 1.
[2] Hall B D, Crotwell A M, Kitzis D R, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2021, 14(4): 3015.
[3] Lenssen N J, Schmidt G A, Hansen J E, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2019, 124(12): 6307.
[4] Tan X, Liu Y, Dong H, et al. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2022, 44: 2955.
[5] Esler M B, Griffith D W T, Wilson S R, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 72(1): 206.
[6] Smale D, Sherlock V, Griffith D T, et al. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, 12(1): 637.
[7] Liu H, Li Y, Zhang Z, et al. Optics Express, 2018, 26(18): 22837.
[8] Statheropoulos M, Pappa A, Karamertzanis P, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1999, 401(1-2): 35.
[9] Liu T, Liu H, Chen Z, et al. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 14(12): 5268.
[10] Kistenev Y V, Skiba V, Prischepa V, et al. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2022, 289: 108278.
[11] Griffith D W T. Applied Spectroscopy, 1996, 50(1): 59.
[12] Jolliffe I T, Cadima J. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2016, 374(2065): 20150202.
[13] Deborah H, Richard N, Hardeberg J Y. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(6): 3224.
[14] Haney R, Siddiqui N, Andress J, et al. 41st International Conference on Environmental Systems, 2011: 5091.
|
| [1] |
GUO Ya-fei1, CAO Qiang1, YE Lei-lei1, ZHANG Cheng-yuan1, KOU Ren-bo1, WANG Jun-mei1, GUO Mei1, 2*. Double Index Sequence Analysis of FTIR and Anti-Inflammatory Spectrum Effect Relationship of Rheum Tanguticum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 188-196. |
| [2] |
WANG Cai-ling1，ZHANG Jing1，WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
| [3] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
| [4] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
| [5] |
FANG Zheng, WANG Han-bo. Measurement of Plastic Film Thickness Based on X-Ray Absorption
Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3461-3468. |
| [6] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
| [7] |
JIA Zong-chao1, WANG Zi-jian1, LI Xue-ying1, 2*, QIU Hui-min1, HOU Guang-li1, FAN Ping-ping1*. Marine Sediment Particle Size Classification Based on the Fusion of
Principal Component Analysis and Continuous Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3075-3080. |
| [8] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
| [9] |
XUE Fang-jia, YU Jie*, YIN Hang, XIA Qi-yu, SHI Jie-gen, HOU Di-bo, HUANG Ping-jie, ZHANG Guang-xin. A Time Series Double Threshold Method for Pollution Events Detection in Drinking Water Using Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3081-3088. |
| [10] |
JIA Hao1, 3, 4, ZHANG Wei-fang1, 3, LEI Jing-wei1, 3*, LI Ying-ying1, 3, YANG Chun-jing2, 3*, XIE Cai-xia1, 3, GONG Hai-yan1, 3, DING Xin-yu1, YAO Tian-yi1. Study on Infrared Fingerprint of the Classical Famous
Prescription Yiguanjian[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3202-3210. |
| [11] |
CAO Qian, MA Xiang-cai, BAI Chun-yan, SU Na, CUI Qing-bin. Research on Multispectral Dimension Reduction Method Based on Weight Function Composed of Spectral Color Difference[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2679-2686. |
| [12] |
TIAN Ze-qi1, WANG Zhi-yong1, YAO Jian-guo1, GUO Xu1, LI Hong-dou1, GUO Wen-mu1, SHI Zhi-xiang2, ZHAO Cun-liang1, LIU Bang-jun1*. Quantitative FTIR Characterization of Chemical Structures of Highly Metamorphic Coals in a Magma Contact Zone[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2747-2754. |
| [13] |
ZHANG Xiao-xu1, LIN Xiao-xian3, ZHANG Dan2, ZHANG Qi1, YIN Xue-feng2, YIN Jia-lu3, 4, ZHANG Wei-yue4, LI Yi-xuan1, WANG Dong-liang3, 4*, SUN Ya-nan1*. Study on the Analysis of the Relationship Between Functional Factors and Intestinal Flora in Freshly Stewed Bird's Nest Based on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2452-2457. |
| [14] |
ZHANG Zi-hao1, GUO Fei3, 4, WU Kun-ze1, YANG Xin-yu2, XU Zhen1*. Performance Evaluation of the Deep Forest 2021 (DF21) Model in
Retrieving Soil Cadmium Concentration Using Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2638-2643. |
| [15] |
CHEN Wan-jun1, XU Yuan-jie2, LU Zhi-yun3, QI Jin-hua3, WANG Yi-zhi1*. Discriminating Leaf Litters of Six Dominant Tree Species in the Mts. Ailaoshan Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2119-2123. |
|
|
|
|
