|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Surface Structure on Emissivity of Area Blackbody |
ZHANG Yu-feng1, WU Yu-ling2, WU Yuan-qing1*, JIA Hui2, LIU Wen-hao2, DAI Jing-min3 |
1. Institute of Physical Science and Technology, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China
2. Institute of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China
3. School of Instrumentation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
|
|
|
Abstract With the rapid development of infrared temperature measurement technology, infrared thermometer plays an important role in both military and civil fields, so it calls for higher measurement accuracy. It should be observed that a couple of years have witnessed an increasing number of people who are concerned that radiation source consisting of area blackbody is the vital device to calibrate the non-contact thermometer. Spectral emissivity is an essential parameter to describe the performance of radiation sources, while there is less research involved in the effect of blackbody surface topography on emissivity. It is manifested that the emissivity of the area blackbody is related to the combination structure of the evagination cone and coating. In order to design a remarkable performance area blackbody with high emissivity, the paper takes the area blackbody with convex cone structure as the basic model, adding components of spacing resembling grating and coating, and establishes an area blackbody model with different structural parameters, cell spacing and coating thickness. Graphite and silicon nitride is set as the base material and the coating material, respectively. Reflectivity is obtained by measuring the variation of reflected radiation with related soft. Then the emissivity is calculated through the relationship between reflectivity and emissivity, drawing the curve of spectral emissivity in the range of 3~14 μm. According to the electric field distribution of the surface and curve of spectral emissivity, we analyze the influence of parameters such as the ratio of width to length, coating thickness and spacing on emissivity. It is shown that the height of the structure unit is proportional to spectral emissivity, and emissivity is optimized due to narrower width, which increases as the ratio of width to length decreases. The dropping trend of spectral emissivity is changed by the coating structure in which the emissivity increased at the wavelength above 11 μm, and the emissivity rise with the increasing coating thickness. What’s more, the spacing structure is proportional to emissivity. The height and width of the unit structure of the original area blackbody are set at 10 and 1 μm, respectively. A coating with a thickness of 2 μm and a spacing structure with a width of 2 μm are sequentially added to the original model for simulation calculation. The optimized blackbody radiation source has advantages in the long wavelength band, and the spectral emissivity with a minimum value of 0.966 is stable in the range of 3~14 μm. The electric field distribution shows the influence of these structural factors on the surface energy of the area blackbody, and the optimized model parameters can be used to manufacture a realistic area blackbody. Simulation results illustrate that a smaller aspect ratio, thicker coating and larger spacing improve spectral emissivity, which provide a theoretical reference for the manufacture of radiation sources consisting of area blackbody with high radiation performance.
|
Received: 2021-11-04
Accepted: 2022-05-08
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WU Yuan-qing
E-mail: wuyuanqing123@163.com
|
|
[1] LI Chao, ZHANG Yu-guo, LIU Bao-wei, et al(李 超, 张玉国, 刘保炜, 等). Journal of Applied Optics(应用光学),2021, 42(2): 292.
[2] Shimizu Yuhei, Koshikawa Hiroshi, Imbe Masatoshi, Yamaki Tetsuya. Optics Express, 2020, 28(15): 22606.
[3] Filtz J R, Valin T, Hameury J, et al. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2009, 30(1): 236.
[4] Hao X Q, Song J, Ding L, et al. Metrologia, 2020, 57(6): 065016.
[5] Parmar Neha, Sinha Abhishek, Pathak S K, et al. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2021, 172: 112752.
[6] Li L F, Yu K, Zhang K H, et al. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2021, 125(3): 110379.
[7] Yuhei Shimizu, Hiroshi Koshikawa, Masatoshi Imbe. Optics Express, 2020, 28(15): 22606.
[8] WU Fei, DONG Jie, TIAN Hai-xia, et al(吴 飞, 董 杰, 田海霞, 等). Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程), 2015, 44(9): 2609.
[9] HU You-hua, HAO Xiao-peng, SIMA Rui-heng, et al (扈又华, 郝小鹏, 司马瑞衡, 等). Acta Metrologica Sinica(计量学报), 2021, 42(3): 314.
[10] Avinash Kumar, Amartya Chowdhury. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2020, 39(10): 1.
[11] Kumar A, Chowdhury A. Solar Energy, 2019, 183(5): 410.
[12] Luke K, Okawachi Y, Lamont M R E, et al. Optics Letters, 2015, 40(21): 4823.
[13] Boidin R, Halenkovič T, Nazabal V, et al. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(1): 1177.
|
[1] |
GAO Wei-ling, ZHANG Kai-hua*, XU Yan-fen, LIU Yu-fang*. Data Processing Method for Multi-Spectral Radiometric Thermometry Based on the Improved HPSOGA[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3659-3665. |
[2] |
ZHANG Ning-chao1, YE Xin1, LI Duo1, XIE Meng-qi1, WANG Peng1, LIU Fu-sheng2, CHAO Hong-xiao3*. Application of Combinatorial Optimization in Shock Temperature
Inversion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3666-3673. |
[3] |
CHEN Tu-nan1, 2, LI Kang1, QIU Zong-jia1, HAN Dong1, 2, ZHANG Guo-qiang1, 2*. Simulation Analysis and Experiment Verification of Insulating Material-Based Photoacoustic Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2922-2927. |
[4] |
XING Jian, LIU Zhi-jun, HAN Bing, HAO Xiang-wei*. Multi-Spectral True Temperature Inversion Algorithm Based on
Generalized Inverse Matrix-Coordinate Rotation Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1936-1940. |
[5] |
ZHANG Xuan1, ZENG Chao-bin1, LIU Xian-ya1, CHEN Ping1, 2, 3*, HAN Yan2, 3. Multi-Spectral Temperature Measurement Method Based on Multivariate Extreme Value Optimization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 705-711. |
[6] |
SUN Hong-sheng1, 2, LIANG Xin-gang1, MA Wei-gang1, ZHANG Yu-feng3, QIU Chao2, MA Yue-gang2. Method and Device for Measuring High-Temperature Spectral Emissivity of Non-Conductive Materials Based on Laser Rotation Heating[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 310-315. |
[7] |
XU Yan-fen1, ZHANG Kai-hua1*, LIU Yan-lei1, YU Kun1, LIU Yu-fang1, 2*. Experimental Investigation of Spectral Emissivity of Copper-Nickel Alloy During Thermal Oxidation Process[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2969-2974. |
[8] |
XING Jian1, MA Zhao2, BAI Yan1*. Multi Spectral Radiation External Penalty Function Inversion Algorithm for Flame Temperature Measurement of Biomass Boiler[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3761-3764. |
[9] |
ZHANG Fu-cai1, 2, TANG Wei1, SUN Xiao-gang2*. Multispectral True Temperature Inversion Based on Multi-Objective Minimum Optimization Principle of Reference Temperature[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 3130-3135. |
[10] |
LI Ming, QIN Kai*, ZHAO Ning-bo, TIAN Feng, ZHAO Ying-jun. Study on the Relationship Between Black Soil Emissivity Spectrum and Total Potassium Content Based on TASI Thermal Infrared Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2862-2868. |
[11] |
CHENG Gang1, CAO Ya-nan1, TIAN Xing1, CAO Yuan2, LIU Kun2*. Influence of Photoacoustic Cell Geometrical Shape on the Performance of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2345-2351. |
[12] |
ZHANG Fu-cai1, 2, LIU Yun-gang1, SUN Xiao-gang2*. Multispectral True Temperature Inversion Based on Multi-Objective Minimum Optimization Principle of Reference Temperature (IMR)[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(07): 2122-2127. |
[13] |
YU Kun1, SHI Rui-tao1, ZHANG Hui-yan1, WANG Wen-bao2, LIU Yu-fang1. Experimental Investigation of Infrared Spectral Emissivity of Pure Tungsten[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(01): 107-112. |
[14] |
DONG Hai-long, WANG Jia-chun*, ZENG Yu-run, CHEN Zong-sheng, SHI Jia-ming. Reflection Spectrum Study of THz Wave by Infrared Low Emissivity Stealth Coating[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(10): 3007-3012. |
[15] |
ZHANG Fu-cai1, 2, SUN Bo-jun1, SUN Xiao-gang1*, LIANG Mei1. Multi Objective Planck’s Minimization Optimization Method for Multispectral True Temperature Inversion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1834-1839. |
|
|
|
|