|
|
|
|
|
|
| Study on the Calibration of Reflectivity of the Cavity Mirrors Used in Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy |
| WU Lu-yi, GAO Guang-zhen, LIU Xin, GAO Zhen-wei, ZHOU Xin, YU Xiong, CAI Ting-dong* |
| School of Physics and Electronic Engineering，Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (CEAS) technology is an important part of high sensitive spectroscopy, which has the advanced characteristics of relatively simple apparatus, high sensitivity, and strong environmental adaptability. Using a 2.0 μm tunable diode laser as the light source, combined with CEAS, a device for measuring the reflectance of the lens was built, and the absorption spectrum of CO2 gas at 5 001.49 cm-1 was used as the research target. The path length absorption cell and the known concentration of absorption gas have been calibrated for the reflectivity of the same pair of high reflectivity lenses. The first calibration method uses a multi-pass cell with a known path length as a reference cell. In this calibration, the absorptions from the resonant cavity and the multi-pass reference cell are measured simultaneously and compared to deduce the effective absorption path of the cavity enhancement system. Then the mirror reflectivity is obtained from the relationship between the mirror reflectivity and the effective absorption path. In the second calibration method, the integrated absorbance of a CO2 transition in a mixture with known concentration are measured for calibration. The mirror reflectivity is calculated by the relation of the integrated absorbance, the gas molecule number density and the line intensity of the selected CO2 transition. Finally, the two methods are compared for the calibration results of the lens reflectivity. The results show that the ratio of the integrated absorption area of the signal measured by the integrating cavity to the reference cell in the first method is 10.5, and the effective absorption path of the integrating cavity and the reflectivity of the lens are 302.65 m and 99.85%, respectively. The concentration of CO2 gas in the atmosphere is 0.037 3%, which is consistent with the actual atmospheric CO2 content. The advantage of this method is that it is not affected by sample concentration, but because of the introduction of a new reference cell, the pressure and temperature of the gas in the two cells need to be kept the same, so this method is suitable for an open cavity structure. In the second method, the absorption spectrum of CO2 is measured at 5 001.49 cm-1, the molecular number density N of CO2 gas is 9.099 101 5 molecules·cm-3, and the line intensity of the line in the Hitran database is 3.902×10-22 cm·molecule-1, the reflectance of the lens is calculated to be 99.84%. The advantage of the above method is that the structure is simple, but the molecular number density of the gas needs to be known, so the error of concentration and pressure will affect the calibration of the reflectivity of the cavity mirror. These two methods can accurately calibrate the reflectivity of the cavity mirror, and the corresponding suitable method can be selected as a reference in actual application.
|
|
Received: 2020-08-02
Accepted: 2020-12-11
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CAI Ting-dong
E-mail: caitingdong@126.com
|
|
[1] Goldenstein C, Spearrin M, Jeffries J, et al. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2017, 60: 132.
[2] Viljanen J, Sorvajärvi T, Toivonen J. Optics Letters, 2017, 42(23): 4925.
[3] Baer D S, Paul J B, Gupta M, et al. Applied Physics B, Lasers Optics, 2002, 75(2-3): 261.
[4] Keefe A O. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 293(5-6)：331.
[5] Langridge J M, Ball S M, Shillings A J L, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2008, 79(12): 2544.
[6] Varma R M, Venables D S, Ruth A A, et al. Applied Optics, 2009, 48: 159.
[7] Washenfelder R A, Langford A O, Fuchs H, et al. Chemical Physics, 2008, 8: 7779.
[8] Langridge J M, Ball S M, Shillings A J L, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2008, 79: 123110.
[9] TIAN Xing, CAO Yuan, WANG Jing-jing, et al(田 兴, 曹 渊, 王静静). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(10): 3078.
[10] Zhao W X, Gao X M, Deng L H, et al. Applied Physics B, 2007, 86, 353.
[11] LI Zhi-bin, MA Hong-liang, CAO Zhen-song, et al(李志彬，马宏亮，曹振松). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2016，65(5): 053301.
[12] Fiedler S E, Hese A, Ruth A A. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76(2): 565. |
| [1] |
LIU Shu-hong1, 2, WANG Lu-si3*, WANG Li-sheng3, KANG Zhi-juan1, 2，WANG Lei1, 2，XU Lin1, 2，LIU Ai-qin1, 2. A Spectroscopic Study of Secondary Minerals on the Epidermis of Hetian Jade Pebbles From Xinjiang, China[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 169-175. |
| [2] |
ZHANG Zhi-wei1, 2, QIU Rong1, 2*, YAO Yin-xu1, 2, WAN Qing3, PAN Gao-wei1, SHI Jin-fang1. Measurement and Analysis of Uranium Using Laser-Induced
Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 57-61. |
| [3] |
ZHAO Guo-qiang1, QIU Meng-lin1*, ZHANG Jin-fu1, WANG Ting-shun1, WANG Guang-fu1, 2*. Peak Splitting Method of Ion-Beam-Induced-Luminescence Spectrum Based on Voigt Function Fitting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3512-3518. |
| [4] |
CAO Su-qiao1, DAI Hui1*, WANG Chao-wen2, YU Lu1, ZUO Rui1, WANG Feng1, GUO Lian-qiao1. Gemological and Spectral Characteristics of Emeralds From Swat Valley, Pakistan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3533-3540. |
| [5] |
DENG Xian-ze1, 2, DENG Xi-guang1, 2*, YANG Tian-bang1, 2, CAI Zhao3, REN Jiang-bo1, 2, ZHANG Li-min1, 2. To Reveal the Occurrence States and Enrichment Mechanisms of Metals in Modules From Clarion-Clipperton Zone in Eastern Pacific by High
Resolution Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2522-2527. |
| [6] |
WANG Xin-qiang1, 3, HU Feng1, 3, XIONG Wei2, YE Song1, 3, LI Shu1, 3, GAN Yong-ying1, 3, YIN Shan1, 3, WANG Fang-yuan1, 3*. Research on Raman Signal Processing Method Based on Spatial Heterodyne[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 93-98. |
| [7] |
JIAO Qing-liang1, LIU Ming1*, YU Kun2, LIU Zi-long2, 3, KONG Ling-qin1, HUI Mei1, DONG Li-quan1, ZHAO Yue-jin1. Spectral Pre-Processing Based on Convolutional Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 292-297. |
| [8] |
HE Xiong-fei1, 2, HUANG Wei3, TANG Gang3, ZHANG Hao3*. Mechanism Investigation of Cement-Based Permeable Crystalline Waterproof Material Based on Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3909-3914. |
| [9] |
ZHU Zhi-gao1, LIU Ya1*, YANG Jie1, HU Guo-qing2, 3. A Review of Single-Cavity Dual-Comb Laser and Its Application in Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3321-3330. |
| [10] |
ZHANG Zhi-qi1, ZHAO Tong1, LIU Ling1, LI Yan1,2*. Spectral Characteristics of Madagascar Agates[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3227-3232. |
| [11] |
CHEN Dong-yang1, ZHOU Li1*, YANG Fu-mo1, WANG Wei-gang2, GE Mao-fa2. Application Progress of Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (CEAS) in Atmospheric Environment Research[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2688-2695. |
| [12] |
LI Qing-yuan, LI Jing, WEI Xin, SUN Mei-xiu*. Performance Evaluation of a Portable Breath Isoprene Analyzer Based on Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2415-2419. |
| [13] |
YU Lei, WANG Ya-mei*. The Spectral Characteristics of “Edison” Pearls and Nucleated Pearls With Dyeing Treatment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2626-2632. |
| [14] |
LU Wei1, CAI Miao-miao1, ZHANG Qiang2, LI Shan3. Fast Classification Method of Black Goji Berry (Lycium Ruthenicum Murr.) Based on Hyperspectral and Ensemble Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2196-2204. |
| [15] |
LING Liu-yi1,3*, HUANG You-rui1,2*, WANG Chen-jun1, HU Ren-zhi3, LI Ang3, XIE Pin-hua3. Optimization of IBBCEAS Spectral Retrieval Range Based on Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1869-1873. |
|
|
|
|
