|
|
|
|
|
|
| Retrieving Corn Canopy Leaf Area Index Based on Sentinel-2 Image and PROSAIL Model Parameter Calibration |
| SU Wei1,2, WU Jia-yu1,2, WANG Xin-sheng1,2, XIE Zi-xuan1,2, ZHANG Ying1,2, TAO Wan-cheng1,2, JIN Tian1,2 |
1. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing for Agri-Hazards, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Leaf area index (LAI) is related to photosynthesis, transpiration and biomass accumulating processes of vegetation closely. It is one of the important parameters of corn growth monitoring, disaster stress monitoring and yield prediction, as well as an important parameter of the radiative transfer model and crop growth model. Sentinel-2satelliteis the second satellite of the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) plan. It has high spatial and temporal resolution, and visible and near-infrared bands resolution is 10 m, so sentinel-2 satellite is an ideal data source for agricultural remote sensing applications. The PROSAIL radiative transfer model is an effective way to retrievecorn canopy LAI using remote sensing images. However, there are some problems for LAI retrieval currently, including uncertainty of model inputs, difficulty in parameter adjustment, ill-posed inversion and low speed etc. Model inputs calibration can be used to acquire the exact value of model inputs in the uncertainty range of the observed reflectivity. Rich and accurate parameter information is provided to reduce the errors in parameter retrieval. In this paper, a sentinel-2A satellite image was used as the data source, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was used to calibrate model inputs. The spectral reflectance uncertainty of 5% was added to obtain the posterior value probability distribution of each parameter, to optimize the parameter setting in the retrieval process and improve the accuracy of LAI retrieval. The results showed that: (1) The sensitive model inputs of the PROSAIL model were LAI, chlorophyll content of leaves and leaf structure coefficient within visible and near-infrared bands. Taking these three parameters as variables in the look-up table could effectively retrieve LAI, and the determination coefficient of retrieval accuracy reached 0.7. (2) MCMC method could be used to calibrate the PROSAIL model input and acquire each model input distribution in the study area. The posterior parameter distribution was close to the actual situation, indicating the feasibility and effectiveness of using the MCMC method for parameter calibration. (3) Input calibration could effectively improve the LAI retrieving accuracy, especially in reducing retrieval deviation and outliers. After inputs calibration, the average error of LAI retrieval decreased from 20% to 8%, while the estimation accuracy increased from 76% to 90%. These results showed that the model inputs calibration of the PROSAIL model by MCMC could improve the LAI retrieval accuracy and reduce the retrieval deviation. It provided a reference for improving the retrieval accuracy of crop canopy parameters by the PROSAIL radiative transfer model.
|
|
Received: 2020-03-09
Accepted: 2020-06-28
|
|
|
|
[1] LIANG Shun-lin, LI Xiao-wen, WANG Jin-di(梁顺林, 李小文, 王锦地). Advanced Remote Sensing: Concepts and Algorithm(定量遥感: 理念与算法). Beijing: Science Press(北京: 科学出版社), 2013. 317.
[2] Chen J M, Black T A. Plant Cell and Environment, 1992, 15(4): 421.
[3] WU Bing-fang, ZHANG Feng, LIU Cheng-lin, et al(吴炳方, 张 峰, 刘成林, 等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2004, 8(6): 498.
[4] SU Wei, GUO Hao, ZHAO Dong-ling, et al(苏 伟, 郭 皓, 赵冬玲, 等). Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2016, 47(3): 234.
[5] YANG Gui-jun, ZHAO Chun-jiang, XING Zhu-rong, et al(杨贵军, 赵春江, 邢著荣，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2011, 27(10): 88.
[6] CAI Qing-kong, LI Er-jun, TAO Liang-liang, et al(蔡庆空, 李二俊, 陶亮亮, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(20): 117.
[7] ZHANG Ming-zheng, SU Wei, ZHU De-hai(张明政, 苏 伟, 朱德海). Geography and Geo-Information Science(地理与地理信息科学), 2019, 35(5): 28.
[8] Locherer M, Hank T, Danner M, et al. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(8): 10321.
[9] HUANG Jian-xi, HUANG Hai, MA Hong-yuan, et al(黄健熙, 黄 海, 马鸿元, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(16): 113.
[10] Jacquemoud S, Ustin S L, Verdebout J, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 56(3): 194.
[11] Gilks W R, Roberts G O, George E I. The Statistician, 1994, 43(1): 179.
[12] MA Jian-wei, HUANG Shi-feng, LI Ji-ren, et al(马建威, 黄诗峰, 李纪人, 等). Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping(测绘通报), 2016, 468(3): 37.
[13] Su W, Huang J X, Liu D S, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5)：572. |
| [1] |
LIANG Shou-zhen1, SUI Xue-yan1, WANG Meng1, WANG Fei1, HAN Dong-rui1, WANG Guo-liang1, LI Hong-zhong2, MA Wan-dong3. The Influence of Anthocyanin on Plant Optical Properties and Remote Sensing Estimation at the Scale of Leaf[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 275-282. |
| [2] |
ZHANG Hai-yang, ZHANG Yao*, TIAN Ze-zhong, WU Jiang-mei, LI Min-zan, LIU Kai-di. Extraction of Planting Structure of Winter Wheat Using GBDT and Google Earth Engine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 597-607. |
| [3] |
LIANG Hao1, XU Wei-xin1*, DUAN Xu-hui1, ZHANG Juan2, DAI Na1, XIAO Qiang-zhi1, WANG Qi-yu1. Threshold Calibration of Key Parameters of Withered Grass Based on PROSAIL Model in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1144-1149. |
| [4] |
WANG Xin-hui1, 2, GONG Cai-lan1, 2*, HU Yong1, 2, LI Lan1, 2, HE Zhi-jie1, 2. Spectral Feature Construction and Sensitivity Analysis of Water Quality Parameters Remote Sensing Inversion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1880-1885. |
| [5] |
ZHAO Heng-qian1,2, ZHANG Wen-bo2, ZHU Xiao-xin2, BI Yin-li2*, LI Yao3, ZHAO Xue-sheng2, JIN Qian4. Analysis on Susceptibility of Vegetation Canopy Spectra in Coal Mining Area to Land Reclamation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1858-1863. |
| [6] |
FANG Xue-jing1,2,3, XIONG Wei1,3*, SHI Hai-liang1,3, LUO Hai-yan1,3, CHEN Di-hu1,3. Forward Model and Sensitivity Analysis for Limb-Scattered Radiation of Mesospheric OH Radicals Emission in Ultraviolet Band[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(10): 3278-3285. |
| [7] |
SHAN Chang-gong1, LIU Cheng2*, WANG Wei3, SUN You-wen3, LIU Wen-qing3, TIAN Yuan3, YANG Wei3. Analysis of Sensitivity of the Parameters on Carbon Dioxide Retrieval Using High-Resolution Solar Absorption Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(07): 1997-2003. |
| [8] |
ZHANG Peng, HONG Yan-ji*, SHEN Shuang-yan, DING Xiao-yu, MADi . Study on Chemical Kinetic Effect of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(03): 706-710. |
| [9] |
ZHAO Shao-hua1,2, QIN Qi-ming2, ZHANG Feng1, WANG Qiao1, YAO Yun-jun3, YOU Lin2，JIANG Hong-bo2， CUI Rong-bo2, YAO Yian-juan1 . Research on Using a Mono-Window Algorithm for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Chinese Satellite for Environment and Natural Disaster Monitoring(HJ-1B) Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 31(06): 1552-1556. |
| [10] |
GAO Hai-liang1, 2, 3, GU Xing-fa1, 3*, YU Tao1, 3, LI Xiao-ying1, 3, GONG Hui1, 2, 3, LI Jia-guo1, 2, 3, ZHU Guang-hui4 . HJ1A/HSI Radiometric Calibration and Spectrum Response Function Sensitivity Analysis [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 30(11): 3149-3155. |
|
|
|
|
