|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectral Feature Construction and Sensitivity Analysis of Water Quality Parameters Remote Sensing Inversion |
WANG Xin-hui1, 2, GONG Cai-lan1, 2*, HU Yong1, 2, LI Lan1, 2, HE Zhi-jie1, 2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection and Imaging Technology Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract Water quality remote sensing monitoring is one of the important application directions of remote sensing. As an auxiliary mean of traditional water sampling and testing, remote sensing has the advantages of rapid, large-area and contactless. However, most remote sensing sensors commonly used in inland water monitoring are designed for land observation or ocean watercolor observation. The design and setting of sensor performance indicators do not consider the characteristics of inland water, limiting the application of water quality remote sensing monitoring. This study proposes a method for constructing the spectral characteristics of water quality parameter based on variation coefficient and noise ratio index, and study the influence of the spectral resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiation resolution on typical water quality parameters inversion models through the spectral simulation experiments. Firstly, aimed at three main water quality parameters in Shanghai, we construct the spectral characteristics of dissolved oxygen(DO), total phosphorus(TP) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) respectively and establish remote sensing inversion models. Then, we carry out the spectral simulation experiment and calculate the sensitivity (S) and water quality sensitive differential index (CI) for sensitivity analysis. Finally, we evaluate the spectral resolution’s influence, SNR and radiation resolution on water quality parameters inversion models from two aspects of accuracy and stability. The results show that this method can effectively determine the bands of water quality parameters inversion models. Spectral resolution has little effect on the contrast-type inversion models, while SNR and radiation resolution greatly influence the models. With the increase of SNR and radiation resolution, the water quality inversion models’ accuracy and stability are improved to some extent. According to Comprehensive sensitivity analysis of sensors parameters, when the SNR is better than 56 dB, the radiation resolution is not less than 9 bit, and the spectral resolution is appropriate. It can be better applied to inland water quality remote sensing monitoring. This research can provide a reference for the development of sensors for inland water quality monitoring and provide technical support for water resources supervision departments to carry out remote sensing monitoring of water quality, which is conducive to accelerating the construction of an intelligent monitoring system for the water environment.
|
Received: 2020-06-19
Accepted: 2020-10-25
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GONG Cai-lan
E-mail: gcl@mail.sitp.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Palmer S C J, Kutser T, Hunter P D. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 157: 1.
[2] DUAN Hong-tao, LUO Ju-hua, CAO Zhi-gang, et al(段洪涛,罗菊花,曹志刚,等). Progress in Geography(地球科学进展), 2019, 38(8): 1182.
[3] LI Sheng-yang, LIU Zhi-wen, LIU Kang, et al(李盛阳, 刘志文, 刘 康, 等). Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程), 2019, 48(3):9.
[4] Boucher J,Weathers K C,Norouzi H,et al. Ecological Applications,2018,28(4):1044.
[5] El Din E S, Zhang Y, Suliman A. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 38(3-4): 1023.
[6] GONG Shao-qi,HUANG Jia-zhu,LI Yun-mei,et al(龚绍琦,黄家柱,李云梅,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2008,28(4): 839.
[7] Kiševic M, Morovic M, Andričevic R. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2016, 25(11): 4814.
[8] Nikonov A V, Davletshin R V, Iakovleva N I, et al. Journal of Communications Technology & Electronics, 2017, 62(9): 1048.
[9] LIN Jian-yuan,ZHANG Chang-xing(林剑远, 张长兴). Remote Sensing Information(遥感信息),2019,34(2): 23. |
[1] |
LIANG Shou-zhen1, SUI Xue-yan1, WANG Meng1, WANG Fei1, HAN Dong-rui1, WANG Guo-liang1, LI Hong-zhong2, MA Wan-dong3. The Influence of Anthocyanin on Plant Optical Properties and Remote Sensing Estimation at the Scale of Leaf[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 275-282. |
[2] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, YUE Ji-bo3, FAN Yi-guang2, YANG Gui-jun2, ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2*. Estimation of Potato Above-Ground Biomass Based on VGC-AGB Model and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2876-2884. |
[3] |
JIN Chun-bai1, YANG Guang1*, LU Shan2*, LIU Wen-jing1, LI De-jun1, ZHENG Nan1. Band Selection Method Based on Target Saliency Analysis in Spatial Domain[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2952-2959. |
[4] |
GAO Yu1, SUN Xue-jian1*, LI Guang-hua2, ZHANG Li-fu1, QU Liang2, ZHANG Dong-hui1, CHANG Jing-jing2, DAI Xiao-ai3. Study on the Derivation of Paper Viscosity Spectral Index Based on Spectral Information Expansion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2960-2966. |
[5] |
KONG Bo1, YU Huan2*, SONG Wu-jie2, 3, HOU Yu-ting2, XIANG Qing2. Hyperspectral Characteristics and Quantitative Remote Sensing Inversion of Gravel Grain Size in the North Tibetan Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2381-2390. |
[6] |
WANG Hui-min1, 2, YU Lei1, XU Kai-lei1, 2, JIANG Xiao-guang1, 2, WAN Yu-qing1, 2*. Estimation of Salt Content of Saline Soil in Arid Areas Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2278-2286. |
[7] |
ZHANG Xia1, WANG Wei-hao1, 2*, SUN Wei-chao1, DING Song-tao1, 2, WANG Yi-bo1, 2. Soil Zn Content Inversion by Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data and Considering Soil Types[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2019-2026. |
[8] |
CAO Yang1, 2, LI Yan-hong1, 2*. Study on the Effects of NO2 Pollution Under COVID-19 Epidemic
Prevention and Control in Urumqi[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1981-1987. |
[9] |
ZHANG Chao1*, SU Xiao-yu1, XIA Tian2, YANG Ke-ming3, FENG Fei-sheng4. Monitoring the Degree of Pollution in Different Varieties of Maize Under Copper and Lead Stress[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1268-1274. |
[10] |
XU Long-xin1, 2, 3, 4, SUN Yong-hua2, 3, 4*, WU Wen-huan1, ZOU Kai2, 3, 4, HE Shi-jun2, 3, 4, ZHAO Yuan-ming2, 3, 4, YE Miao2, 3, 4, ZHANG Xiao-han2, 3, 4. Research on Classification of Construction Waste Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3927-3934. |
[11] |
FENG Tian-shi1, 2, 3, PANG Zhi-guo1, 2, 3*, JIANG Wei1, 2, 3. Remote Sensing Retrieval of Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Lake Chaohu Based on Zhuhai-1 Hyperspectral Satellite[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2642-2648. |
[12] |
ZHANG Jie1, 2, XU Bo1, FENG Hai-kuan1, JING Xia2, WANG Jiao-jiao1, MING Shi-kang1, FU You-qiang3, SONG Xiao-yu1*. Monitoring Nitrogen Nutrition and Grain Protein Content of Rice Based on Ensemble Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1956-1964. |
[13] |
JING Xia1, ZHANG Jie1, 2, WANG Jiao-jiao2, MING Shi-kang2, FU You-qiang3, FENG Hai-kuan2, SONG Xiao-yu2*. Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Remote Sensing
Monitoring of Rice Yields[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1620-1627. |
[14] |
LIANG Hao1, XU Wei-xin1*, DUAN Xu-hui1, ZHANG Juan2, DAI Na1, XIAO Qiang-zhi1, WANG Qi-yu1. Threshold Calibration of Key Parameters of Withered Grass Based on PROSAIL Model in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1144-1149. |
[15] |
YANG En1, WANG Shi-bo2*. Study on Directional Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectra of Typical Types of Coal[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 847-858. |
|
|
|
|