|
|
|
|
|
|
The Rapid Detection of Trace Mercury in Soil With EDXRF |
NI Zi-yue1, CHENG Da-wei2, LIU Ming-bo2, HU Xue-qiang2, LIAO Xue-liang2, YUE Yuan-bo2, LI Xiao-jia1,2, CHEN Ji-wen3 |
1. Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, China
2. NCS Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100094, China
3. School of Electrical and Control Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China |
|
|
Abstract The pollution of heavy metals in the soil will affect the quality of agricultural products, which could further influence human health. Multiple heavy metals are usually detected with chemical methods in soil, during the process, strong oxidizing materials would be used to digest the samples in the laboratory, and finally, the dissolved solutions are tested. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry could realize the rapid detection of multiple heavy metals in soil, but compared with chemical methods, which has a higher detection limit. For mercury, the national pollution limit is lower than other metals, which makes it difficult to detect rapidly with X-ray fluorescence spectrometry in low-content samples. In this paper, an enrichment device was designed to realize the enrichment of mercury in soil, after testing with the X-ray spectrometer, the rapid detection of mercury in soil could be realized, which met the requirement of the actual test. The soil samples that had been weighed accurately would be heated first, and in this process, the mercury would be desorbed, and at the same time, the filter membrane was used to adsorb it, so as to realize the enrichment of mercury. A mercury generator was used to provide the air with a certain amount of mercury, and different kinds of membranes would be used to study the effects of adsorption. The result found that carbon fiber filter membranes have a good effect on adsorption and could enrich mercury in the air. When different flow velocity was adopted with the same weight of the samples, and the desorption temperature was set up at 800 ℃, the adsorption behavior of two membranes was studied. The results showed that, with the increase of the flow velocity, the intensity of the first membrane decreased, but the intensity of the second membrane increased, which meant that lower flow velocity was a benefit for the adsorption of membranes. when the different amount of mercury contained in solution was added in high-purity silicon dioxide, after enriching and testing by the designed device, the working curve could be obtained with the linear correlation coefficient to be 0.998 5. And the detection limit and quantification limit could be calculated as 7.52 and 25.06 ng respectively when multiple high-purity silicon samples were tested. It meant that if the weight of the sample was 0.3 g, the quantification limit would be 0.083 mg·kg-1 in the soil. The relative deviations were no more than 11.1% for the national standard samples except one sample that was below the quantitative limit, which indicates that this method could realize the rapid detection of mercury in the soil for agricultural land.
|
Received: 2020-07-06
Accepted: 2020-11-05
|
|
|
[1] Asaduzzaman Abu, Riccardi Demian, Afaneh Akef T, et al. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2019, 52(2): 379.
[2] O’Connor David, Hou Deyi, Ok Yong Sik, et al. Environment International, 2019, 126: 747.
[3] Lima F R D, Martins G C, Silva A O, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 666: 472.
[4] Boente C, Albuquerque M T D, Gerassis S, et al. Chemosphere, 2019, 218: 767.
[5] Sun Lu, Guo Dengkui, Liu Ke, et al. Catena, 2019, 175: 101.
[6] Li Leiming, Wu Jun, Lu Jian, et al. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 166: 345.
[7] Sawut Rukeya, Kasim Nijat, Maihemuti Balati, et al. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 642: 864.
[8] Sysalov Jiřina, Kučera Jan, Fikrle Marek, et al. Microchemical Journal, 2013, 110: 691.
[9] Cui Yanhong, Liu Zhouen, Ding Shengli. Analytical Instrumentation, 2017, (3): 44.
[10] Liang Jianhong, Liu Panpan, Chen Zheng, et al. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 64: 345.
[11] Lagerstr M Maria, Norling Matz, Eklund Britta. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(10): 10146.
[12] Caporale Antonio G, Adamo Paola, Capozzi Fiore, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 643: 516.
[13] Li Wencui, Yu Zhan, Fu Yu, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2018, 38(10): 3261.
[14] NIU Jie, ZHANG Wen-xiang, ZHANG Hu-cai, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019, 39(7): 2223.
[15] GB15618—2018 Soil Environmental Quality-Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Agricultural Land.
[16] Fiamegos Yiannis, de la Calle Gunti As Maria Beatriz. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 150: 59.
[17] Brent Robert N, Wines Hunter, Luther Joseph, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 768. |
[1] |
ZHENG Hong-quan, DAI Jing-min*. Research Development of the Application of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Measurement of Trace Gas Concentration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 1-14. |
[2] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
[3] |
YANG Guang1, JIN Chun-bai1, REN Chun-ying2*, LIU Wen-jing1, CHEN Qiang1. Research on Band Selection of Visual Attention Mechanism for Object
Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 266-274. |
[4] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[5] |
HAN Xue1, 2, LIU Hai1, 2, LIU Jia-wei3, WU Ming-kai1, 2*. Rapid Identification of Inorganic Elements in Understory Soils in
Different Regions of Guizhou Province by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 225-229. |
[6] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[7] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[8] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[9] |
MENG Shan1, 2, LI Xin-guo1, 2*. Estimation of Surface Soil Organic Carbon Content in Lakeside Oasis Based on Hyperspectral Wavelet Energy Feature Vector[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3853-3861. |
[10] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[11] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[12] |
WANG Zhi-qiang1, CHENG Yan-xin1, ZHANG Rui-ting1, MA Lin1, GAO Peng1, LIN Ke1, 2*. Rapid Detection and Analysis of Chinese Liquor Quality by Raman
Spectroscopy Combined With Fluorescence Background[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3770-3774. |
[13] |
YI Min-na1, 2, 3, CAO Hui-min1, 2, 3*, LI Shuang-na-si1, 2, 3, ZHANG Zhu-shan-ying1, 2, 3, ZHU Chun-nan1, 2, 3. A Novel Dual Emission Carbon Point Ratio Fluorescent Probe for Rapid Detection of Lead Ions[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3788-3793. |
[14] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[15] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
|
|
|
|