|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Inversion for Wind Injury Assessment of Rubber Trees by Using Mobile Laser Scanning |
YUN Ting1, 3, ZHANG Yan-xia1, WANG Jia-min1, HU Chun-hua1, CHEN Bang-qian2, XUE Lian-feng1*, CHEN Fan-di1 |
1. College of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Rubber Research Institute/Danzhou Investigation & Experiment Station of Tropical Crops of Ministry of Agriculture, CATAS, Danzhou 571737, China
3. College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China |
|
|
Abstract The light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technique, which has the advantages of high efficiency and high accuracy in forest survey and is superior to the traditionalinformation acquisitionmethods, can be used to quickly obtain high-resolution mapping of morphological structures of forest. In this paper, two rubber forest plots (forest plot 1, clonePR107; forest plot 2, clone CATAS7-20-59) are taken as the study subjects, which are under the long-term impact of wind-induced disturbance severity and located in Danzhou city, the largest rubber production base of Hainan Island, China. First, point cloud of the forest plots through man-loaded mobile LiDAR was collectedand Ruili entropy method was designed to process the scanned data for calculating the slope angle of tree trunk (typhoon-induced) in order to find the canopy centre of each tree. Second, after the vertical projection of scanned forest points, Watershed and Mean shift algorithm were adopted to realize individual tree canopy delineation. Finally, many tree parameters, such as crown breadth, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), crown volume, leaf area density, leaf distribution and included angle between trunk and main branches, were deduced automatically for analyzing the impact of typhoon disturbance on the two forest plots. Overall parameters obtained from our methods were compared with manual field measurements. The calculated average crown diameter in west-east direction of rubber trees in forest plot 1 and plot 2 using our method were 3.95 and 3.73 m, respectively, with false rate of 1.74% for forest plot 1 and 6.27% for plot 2. The calculated average crown diameter in north-south direction of rubber trees in forest plot 1 and plot 2 using our method were 6.47 and 6.51 m, respectively, with false rate of 4.02% for forest plot 1 and 2.54% for plot 2. The calculated average diameter at breast height (DBH) for forest plot 1 and plot 2 using our method were 5.20 and 4.73 cm, respectively, with false rate of 2.44% for forest plot 1 and 0.64% for plot 2. The calculated average crown volume for forest plot 1 and plot 2 using our method were 168.01 and 141.80 m3, respectively, with false rate of 0.67% for forest plot 1 and 0.85% for plot 2. The calculated average inclination angle of rubber trunk for forest plot 1 and plot 2 using our method were 18.80° and 13.11°, respectively, with false rate of 5.53% for forest plot 1 and 7.09% for plot 2. The calculated average included angle between trunk and branch for forest plot 1 ranged from 45.21° to 69.23°, and the calculated average included angle between trunk and branch for forest plot 2 ranged from 10.63° to 32.14°. Thedifference in the included angles of two forest plots was nearly 62.63%. Meanwhile, the leaf area index (LAI) of forest plot 1 derived fromhemispherical photos of various zenith angles was generally higher than forest plot 2. Compared with the in-situ measurements, the forest parameters from the subsample (scanned data of 150 trees per forest plot) were accurately retrieved using our method with a deviation of less than 8%. A variety of disturbance, such as the perspective occlusion caused by closed forest canopies, the error produced by multi-scan registration, vegetative elements moved by wind during the scanning process, beam divergence and scanning range constraint of the scanner, hampers the accurate scanned data acquisition and generates computer errors in the algorithm. Meanwhile, the included angle between trunks and branches, canopy volume and leaf area index of rubber tree clone PR107 (in forest plot 1) were overall higher than the parameters of rubber tree clone CATAS7-20-59 (in forest plot 2), resulting in the existence of higher vulnerability of clone PR107 than clone CATAS7-20-59 when wind damage propagation occurred in the forest plots. Thus, our research can be used to study the effects of wind disturbance on different forest plots and to quantify ecological instability of the forest in response to wind excitation. Our method makes a contribution to solving the problem of tree canopy delineation and forest parameter retrieval using man-loaded laser scanning technique, showing promise for further exploration of utilizing mobile terrestrial LiDAR as an effective tool for the applications in forest survey.
|
Received: 2018-02-13
Accepted: 2018-06-10
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XUE Lian-feng
E-mail: xuelianfeng@njfu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] XU Wei-heng, FENG Zhong-ke, SU Zhi-fang, et al(徐伟恒,冯仲科,苏志芳,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2014,34(2): 465.
[2] Ardila J P, Bijker W, Tolpekin V A, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2012,15(4): 57.
[3] Karlson M, Ostwald M, Reese H, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2016,50: 80.
[4] Halperin J, Lemay V, Coops N, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,2016,179: 170.
[5] Cartus O, Kellndorfer J, Rombach M, et al. Remote Sensing,2012,44(11): 3320.
[6] Castillo J A A, Apan A A, Maraseni T N, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2017,134: 70.
[7] Ploton P, Barbier N, Couteron P, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,2018,200: 140.
[8] Cao L, Coops N C, Innes J L, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 178: 158.
[9] Yun T, An F, Li W, et al. Remote Sensing,2016,8(11): 942.
[10] Pierzchaa M, Giguère P, Astrup R. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2018,145: 217.
[11] Jing L, Hu B, Noland T, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2012,70(3): 88.
[12] Hu B, Li J, Jing L, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2014,26(26): 145.
[13] Cheein F A A, Guivant J. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2014,102(1): 19. |
[1] |
LIANG Shou-zhen1, SUI Xue-yan1, WANG Meng1, WANG Fei1, HAN Dong-rui1, WANG Guo-liang1, LI Hong-zhong2, MA Wan-dong3. The Influence of Anthocyanin on Plant Optical Properties and Remote Sensing Estimation at the Scale of Leaf[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 275-282. |
[2] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[3] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[4] |
LI Si-yuan, JIAO Jian-nan, WANG Chi*. Specular Reflection Removal Method Based on Polarization Spectrum
Fusion and Its Application in Vegetation Health Monitoring[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3607-3614. |
[5] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[6] |
GUO Zhou-qian1, 2, LÜ Shu-qiang1, 2, HOU Miao-le1, 2*, SUN Yu-tong1, 2, LI Shu-yang1, 2, CUI Wen-yi1. Inversion of Salt Content in Simulated Mural Based on Hyperspectral
Mural Salt Index[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3272-3279. |
[7] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[8] |
GAO Yu1, SUN Xue-jian1*, LI Guang-hua2, ZHANG Li-fu1, QU Liang2, ZHANG Dong-hui1, CHANG Jing-jing2, DAI Xiao-ai3. Study on the Derivation of Paper Viscosity Spectral Index Based on Spectral Information Expansion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2960-2966. |
[9] |
XIA Chen-zhen1, 2, 3, JIANG Yan-yan4, ZHANG Xing-yu1, 2, 3, SHA Ye5, CUI Shuai1, 2, 3, MI Guo-hua5, GAO Qiang1, 2, 3, ZHANG Yue1, 2, 3*. Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Field of Black Soil Area Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2617-2626. |
[10] |
LIU Zhao1, 2, LI Hua-peng1, CHEN Hui1, 2, ZHANG Shu-qing1*. Maize Yield Forecasting and Associated Optimum Lead Time Research Based on Temporal Remote Sensing Data and Different Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2627-2637. |
[11] |
ZHANG Zi-hao1, GUO Fei3, 4, WU Kun-ze1, YANG Xin-yu2, XU Zhen1*. Performance Evaluation of the Deep Forest 2021 (DF21) Model in
Retrieving Soil Cadmium Concentration Using Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2638-2643. |
[12] |
WANG Hui-min1, 2, YU Lei1, XU Kai-lei1, 2, JIANG Xiao-guang1, 2, WAN Yu-qing1, 2*. Estimation of Salt Content of Saline Soil in Arid Areas Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2278-2286. |
[13] |
JIANG Chuan-li1, ZHAO Jian-yun1, 2*, DING Yuan-yuan1, ZHAO Qin-hao1, MA Hong-yan1. Study on Soil Water Retrieval Technology of Yellow River Source Based on SPA Algorithm and Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1961-1967. |
[14] |
REN Hong-rui1, 2, ZHANG Yue-qi2, HE Qi-jin3, LI Rong-ping1, ZHOU Guang-sheng4, 5*. Extraction of Pddy Rice Planting Area Based on Multi-Temporal FY-3 MERSI Remote Sensing Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1606-1611. |
[15] |
BAI Jie1, 2, NIU Zheng1, 2*, BI Kai-yi1, 2, WANG Ji1, 2, HUANG Yan-ru2, 3, SUN Gang1. Bi-Directional Reflection Characteristic of Vegetation Leaf Measured by Hyperspectral LiDAR and Its Impact on Chlorophyll Content Estimation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1598-1605. |
|
|
|
|