|
|
|
|
|
|
A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3 |
1. College of Computer Science, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China
2. School of Artificial Intelligence, Optics and Electronics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
3. College of Grass Industry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
|
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral images contain abundant ground object information and are widely used in agriculture, industry, military and other fields. Therefore, its identification and classification is an important research topic. However, hyperspectral images have problems, such as high spectral dimension, large noise and limited labeled samples, so they have not achieved good classification results. This paper proposes a hyperspectral image classification model based on band clustering and multi-scale structural feature fusion (ASPS-MRTV). The method mainly includes the following steps. First, hyperspectral data is normalized, and the normalized 3D image is divided into n subspaces according to spectral dimension. Secondly, an adaptive subspace spectral feature extraction framework is constructed using the coarse and thin division strategy. Each spatial band is stretched into a one-dimensional vector, and then the similarity matrix of the band is constructed by using the information divergence. Then, the spectral band averages of each adaptive subspace were superimposed to form spectral features. Finally, the multi-scale relative total variation technique extracts structural features from the obtained spectral feature data. In order to enhance the linear separability of the samples, kernel principal component analysis was performed after data stacking to form the null spectral features. In the comparison experiment, SVM with penalty parameter C and kernel parameter of 24.5 were uniformly used for classification. After testing, the ASPS-MRTV network model achieves the overall classification accuracy of 97.06% and 98.98% on Indian Pines and University of Pavia datasets with 5% and 1% training samples, respectively. Experimental results show that compared with SVM, ASPS(ED), ASPS(ID), ASPS-LBP, ASPS-GLCM and ASPS-BF models, the proposed model achieves better classification performance and computational efficiency and effectively improves the classification accuracy of hyperspectral images under small samples.
|
Received: 2022-06-12
Accepted: 2022-10-26
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Hong-wei
E-mail: whwdyx@163.com
|
|
[1] Feng F B, Li W D, Du Q, et al. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(4): 323.
[2] CHEN Yun-hao, WANG Si-jia, ZHAO Yi-fei, et al(陈云浩,王思佳,赵逸飞,等). Geography and Geo-information Science(地理与地理信息科学), 2019, 35(5): 1.
[3] YANG Fei-fei, LI Shi-juan, LIU Sheng-ping, et al(杨菲菲,李世娟,刘升平,等). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technololgy(中国农业科技导报), 2020, 22(4): 85.
[4] YUAN Xu-peng, ZHANG Da-wei, WANG Cheng, et al(原续鹏,张大伟,王 成,等). Optical Instruments(光学仪器), 2017, 39(1): 73.
[5] Imani M, Ghassemian H. Principal Component Discriminant Analysis for Feature Extraction and Classification of Hyperspectral Images, 2014 Iranian Conference on Intelligent Systems (ICIS). IEEE, 2014: 1.
[6] Sun W, Du Q. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2019, 7(2): 118.
[7] Tan J, Gao Y, Liang Z, et al. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2019, 39(6): 2013.
[8] Ghamisi P, Benediktsson J A, Sveinsson J R. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 52(9): 5771.
[9] Xia J, Dalla Mura M, Chanussot J, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(9): 4768.
[10] Dalla Mura M, Benediktsson J A, Waske B, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(10): 3747.
[11] Hou B, Huang T, Jiao L. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12(12): 2364.
[12] He L, Liu C, Li J, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(7): 4818.
[13] Quesada-Barriuso P, Argüello F, Heras D B. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(4): 1177.
[14] Jia S, Wu K, Zhu J, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 57(2): 1142.
[15] MU Cai-hong, LIU Yi, LIU Jian, et al(慕彩红,刘 逸,刘 健,等). Chinese Patent(中国专利):CN107451614B. 2019.
|
[1] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[2] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, WANG Xin-yue1, CUI Xia-hua1, YU Huang1, CAO Wei-hua1, ZHANG Ya-kun1, XIONG Ying3, FU San-ling4*. Identification of Maize Varieties by Hyperspectral Combined With Extreme Learning Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2928-2934. |
[3] |
TANG Ting, PAN Xin*, LUO Xiao-ling, GAO Xiao-jing. Fusion of ConvLSTM and Multi-Attention Mechanism Network for
Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2608-2616. |
[4] |
LIANG Wan-jie1, FENG Hui2, JIANG Dong3, ZHANG Wen-yu1, 4, CAO Jing1, CAO Hong-xin1*. Early Recognition of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Oilseed Rape by Hyperspectral Imaging Combined With Deep Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2220-2225. |
[5] |
WANG Guang-lai, WANG En-feng, WANG Cong-cong, LIU Da-yang*. Early Bruise Detection of Crystal Pear Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3626-3630. |
[6] |
XIANG Song-yang1, 3, XU Zhang-hua1, 2, 4, 5, 6*, ZHANG Yi-wei1, 2, ZHANG Qi1, 3, ZHOU Xin1, 2, YU Hui1, 3, LI Bin1, 2, LI Yi-fan1, 2. Construction and Application of ReliefF-RFE Feature Selection Algorithm for Hyperspectral Image Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3283-3290. |
[7] |
XU Liang-ji1, 2, MENG Xue-ying2, WEI Ren2, ZHANG Kun2. Experimental Research on Coal-Rock Identification Method Based on
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2135-2142. |
[8] |
DAI Ruo-chen1, TANG Huan2*, TANG Bin1*, ZHAO Ming-fu1, DAI Li-yong1, ZHAO Ya3, LONG Zou-rong1, ZHONG Nian-bing1. Study on Detection Method of Foxing on Paper Artifacts Based on
Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1567-1571. |
[9] |
ZHOU Bing, LI Bing-xuan*, HE Xuan, LIU He-xiong,WANG Fa-zhen. Classification of Camouflages Using Hyperspectral Images Combined With Fusing Adaptive Sparse Representation and Correlation Coefficient[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3851-3856. |
[10] |
ZHANG Liu1, YE Nan1, MA Ling-ling2, WANG Qi2, LÜ Xue-ying1, ZHANG Jia-bao1*. Hyperspectral Band Selection Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3194-3199. |
[11] |
YANG Bao-hua1, GAO Yuan1, WANG Meng-xuan1, QI Lin1, NING Jing-ming2. Estimation Model of Polyphenols Content in Yellow Tea Based on Spectral-Spatial Features[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 936-942. |
[12] |
ZHAO Peng1,2*, HAN Jin-cheng1, WANG Cheng-kun1. Wood Species Classification With Microscopic Hyper-Spectral Imaging Based on I-BGLAM Texture and Spectral Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 599-605. |
[13] |
ZHAO Fan, YAN Zhao-ru, XUE Jian-xin, XU Bing. Identification of Wild Black and Cultivated Goji Berries by Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 201-205. |
[14] |
NING Hong-zhang1, 2, TAN Xin1*, LI Yu-hang1, 2, JIAO Qing-bin1, LI Wen-hao1. Joint Space-Spectrum SG Filtering Algorithms for Hyperspectral Images and Its Application[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(12): 3699-3704. |
[15] |
ZHANG Yan, HUA Wen-shen*, HUANG Fu-yu, WANG Qiang-hui, SUO Wen-kai. Space-Spectrum Joint Anomaly Degree for Hyperspectral Anomaly Target Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(06): 1902-1908. |
|
|
|
|