基于离散小波的土壤全氮高光谱特征提取与反演

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3223-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3158 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Soil total nitrogen is an important nutrient index. Hyperspectral technology is used to study and build a hyperspectral estimation model of total nitrogen content in Shajiang black soil, which provides a reference for crop fertilization and the development of precision agriculture. This paper attempts to study the feasibility of discrete wavelets to estimate soil total nitrogen content. Taking different wheat nitrogen fertilizer treatments in Shangshui County, Henan Province, as the experimental area, 100 samples of Shajiang black soil with a depth of 0~20 cm were collected. After the soil samples were air-dried in the dark and processed by grinding and screening, the spectra were collected in the darkroom of the laboratory. The total samples (100 sand ginger black soil) were divided into 75 modeling sets and 25 validation sets. The original spectrum was transformed by the first derivative, and the first derivative spectrum was analyzed by correlation analysis and discrete wavelet transform respectively. At the same time, the hyperspectral estimation model of soil total nitrogen content was constructed by combining the support vector machine and the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. The correlation between the single band of the original spectrum and the first derivative spectrum and soil total nitrogen were systematically analyzed. The results showed that after the first derivative transformation, the spectrum had a better correlation with soil total nitrogen, and the correlation coefficient reached 0.84 at 1 373 nm. The discrete wavelet algorithm selects the best mother wavelet and decomposition level of the first derivative spectrum. The results show that the wavelet coefficients decomposed by the Sym8 function can better reconstruct the spectral information of soil total nitrogen. Further, based on the low-frequency coefficients of decomposition layer L₁—L₁₁, the support vector regression and k-nearest neighbor regression estimation models of soil total nitrogen content were established respectively, and all the estimation models were compared. The model constructed by combining the low-frequency coefficients of decomposition layer L₅ with k-nearest neighbor is the best. The determination coefficient of modeling is 0.90, the root mean square deviation is 0.09 g·kg^-1, and the relative analysis error is 3.78. The validation determination coefficient is 0.97, the root mean square deviation is 0.05 g·kg^-1, and the relative analysis deviation is 4.30. At the same time, compared with the model constructed with the full band and the sensitive band selected after correlation analysis as input, the accuracy of the K-neighbor model is improved by 3.2% and 9%, and the accuracy of the support vector machine model is improved by 6.7% and 11.6%. The results show that the first derivative transform and discrete wavelet technology can effectively suppress the impact of noise, improve the estimation accuracy of soil total nitrogen content, reduce the dimension of spectral data, simplify the complexity of the model, and provide a reference for the accurate estimation of the total nitrogen content of Shajiang black soil.

Key words：Shajiang black soil; Total nitrogen; Hyperspectral; Discrete wavelet; K-neighbor

Received: 2022-06-20 Accepted: 2022-10-08

ZTFLH:

S151.9

Corresponding Authors: SI Hai-ping E-mail: pingsss@126.com

Cite this article:

ZHANG Juan-juan,NIU Zhen,MA Xin-ming, et al. Hyperspectral Feature Extraction and Estimation of Soil Total Nitrogen Based on Discrete Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3223-3229.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3223-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2023/V43/I10/3223

[1] ZHANG Juan-juan, XI Lei, YANG Xiang-yang, et al（张娟娟, 席磊, 杨向阳, 等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报）, 2020, 36(17): 135.
[2] Peng Y, Zhao L, Hu Y, et al. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(10): 437.
[3] Guo L, Zhao C, Zhang H, et al. Geoderma, 2017, 285: 280.
[4] Rinnan A, Van Den Berg F, Engelsen S B. TrAC-Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 28(10): 1201.
[5] Cheng H, Shen R, Chen Y, et al. Geoderma, 2019, 336: 59.
[6] SUN Xiao-xiang, ZHAO Xiao-min, XIE Wen（孙小香, 赵小敏, 谢文）. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences（江苏农业科学）, 2018, 46(15): 287.
[7] REN Hong-yan, SHI Xue-zheng, ZHUANG Da-fang, et al（任红艳, 史学正, 庄大方, 等）. Remote Sensing Technology and Application（遥感技术与应用）, 2012, 27(3): 372.
[8] HU Gui-gui, YANG Fen-li, YANG Lian-an, et al(胡贵贵, 杨粉莉, 杨联安, 等). Arid Land Geography（干旱区地理）, 2021, 44(4): 1114.
[9] Hong Y, Chen Y, Yu L, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(3): 479.
[10] Nijat Kasim, Rukeya Sawut, SHI Qing-dong, et al（尼加提·卡斯木, 茹克亚·萨吾提, 师庆东, 等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报）, 2018, 49(11): 155.
[11] CHEN Hong-yan, ZHAO Geng-xing, LI Xi-can, et al（陈红艳, 赵庚星, 李希灿, 等）. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology（应用生态学报）, 2011, 22(11): 2935.
[12] WANG Yan-cang, YANG Xiu-feng, ZHAO Qi-chao, et al（王延仓, 杨秀峰, 赵起超, 等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2019, 39(9): 2855.
[13] GUO Yun-kai, XIE Xiao-feng, XIE Qiong, et al（郭云开, 谢晓峰, 谢琼, 等）. Engineering of Surveying and Mapping（测绘工程）, 2021, 30(3): 66.
[14] Lin L, Wang Y, Teng J, et al. Sensors, 2015, 15(8): 17990.
[15] Li F, Mistele B, Hu Y C, et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 180：44.
[16] Blackburn G A, Ferwerda J G. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(4): 1614.
[17] Vapnik V N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, 1995.
[18] Ali I, Greifeneder F, Stamenkovic J, et al. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(12): 16398.
[19] Cover T, Hart P. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1967, 13(1): 21.
[20] Li F, Wang L, Liu J, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(11): 1331.
[21] XIAO Yan, XIN Hong-bo, WANG Bin，et al（肖艳, 辛洪波, 王斌, 等）. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources（国土资源遥感） , 2021, 33(2): 33.
[22] Ge Y, Thomasson J A. Transactions of the ASABE, 2006, 49(4): 1193.
[23] Viscarra Rossel R A, Lark R M. European Journal of Soil Science, 2009, 60(3): 453.
[24] Xu Y, Wang X, Bai J, et al. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 111: 106002.