|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on the Fluorescence Spectra Characteristics of Abamectin Technical and Preparation Solution |
YAN Kang-ting1, 2, HAN Yi-fang1, 2, WANG Lin-lin1, 2, DING Fan3, LAN Yu-bin1, 2*, ZHANG Ya-li2, 3* |
1. College of Electronic Engineering,College of Artificial Intelligence, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2. National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology, Guangzhou 510642, China
3. College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
|
|
|
Abstract Excessive use of abamectin in agricultural production causes excessive crop pesticide residues. This study used a JASCO FP8300 fluorescence spectrophotometer to detect abamectin pesticide solution.The fluorescence spectrum characteristics of the abamectin technical solution and preparation solution were analyzed to provide a data reference basis for the rapid detection of abamectin. The experiment first analyzed the three-dimensional fluorescence spectra of the technical solution and two preparation solutions from different manufacturers. It is determined that the fluorescence characteristic peak area belonging to the abamectin is Ex=250~ 290 nm, Em=280~320 nm, and the best excitation wavelength is 270 nm. Therefore, 270 nm was selected as the best excitation band for two-dimensional fluorescence spectrum detection. According to the two-dimensional spectral data, the fluorescence intensity of abamectin fluorescence characteristic peak was analyzed with the change of solution concentration, and the prediction model of them was obtained by fitting relevant data. According to the results of data analysis, theR2 of the prediction model of abamectin technical solution was 0.999, and the root means square error (RMSE) of the prediction results was 0.359 mg·L-1 in the concentration range of 10~35 mg·L-1. Besides, theR2 of the abamectin preparation solution prediction model produced by two different manufacturers within the concentration range of 10~35 mg·L-1 were 0.935 and 0.985. Moreover, the root means square error (RMSE) of the predicted results were 1.945 and 0.858 mg·L-1. The results showed that the fluorescence effect of abamectin in the preparation could not be lost due to other fillers and additives. In addition, the concentration of abamectin could be reflected by the fluorescence intensity value, which further verified the feasibility of using the fluorescence spectrum to detect the content of abamectin.
|
Received: 2021-08-30
Accepted: 2022-01-18
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LAN Yu-bin, ZHANG Ya-li
E-mail: ylzhang@scau.edu.cn;ylan@scau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] XU Yu-yan, LIU Qiao-rong, FU Xiao-ping, et al(许玉艳,刘巧荣,付晓苹, 等). Journal of Food Safety & Quality(食品安全质量检测学报), 2016, 7(6): 2281.
[2] CHEN Xiao-lan, CAI Xiang-yu, FENG Liang-jun, et al(陈晓兰,蔡翔宇,冯良军, 等). Agrochemicals (农药), 2021, 60(2): 123.
[3] Muharfiza, Al Riza D, Saito Y, et al. Horticulturae, 2017, 3(4): 51.
[4] Nie S, Al Riza D F, Ogawa Y, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2020, 162: 111113.
[5] Omwange K A, Al Riza D F, Sen N, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2020, 287: 110111.
[6] SUN Jun, ZHOU Xin, MAO Han-ping, et al(孙 俊,周 鑫,毛罕平, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(19): 302.
[7] WANG Yu-tian, BIAN Xu, SHANG Feng-kai, et al(王玉田,边 旭,商凤凯, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(12): 3780.
[8] Xu J, Liu X, Wang Y. Food Chemistry, 2016, 212: 72.
[9] GONG Xue-yong, ZHANG Hong-zhi, HOU Chao, et al(巩学勇,张宏志,侯 超, 等). Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(分析化学), 2016, 44(10): 1533.
[10] WANG Shu-tao, YUAN Yuan-yuan, WANG Yu-tian, et al(王书涛,苑媛媛,王玉田, 等). Chinese Journal of Luminescence(发光学报), 2016, 37(10): 1267.
[11] XIAO Chang-jiang, ZHANG Jing-chao(肖长江,张景超). Chinese Journal of Luminescence(发光学报), 2017, 38(10): 1391.
[12] Ji R, Zhao Z, Zhu X, et al. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 2015, 26(1): 8.
[13] XU Jin-gou, WANG Zun-ben(许金钩,王尊本). Fluorescence Analysis Method(荧光分析法). Beijing: Science Press(北京:科学出版社), 2006.
|
[1] |
LU Wen-jing, FANG Ya-ping, LIN Tai-feng, WANG Hui-qin, ZHENG Da-wei, ZHANG Ping*. Rapid Identification of the Raman Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Cell
Derived Exosomes and the Relationship With Maternal Cells[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3840-3846. |
[2] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
[3] |
CHENG Fang-beibei1, 2, GAN Ting-ting1, 3*, ZHAO Nan-jing1, 4*, YIN Gao-fang1, WANG Ying1, 3, FAN Meng-xi4. Rapid Detection of Heavy Metal Lead in Water Based on Enrichment by Chlorella Pyrenoidosa Combined With X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2500-2506. |
[4] |
LI Bin, SU Cheng-tao, YIN Hai, LIU Yan-de*. Hyperspectral Imaging Technology Combined With Machine Learning for Detection of Moldy Rice[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2391-2396. |
[5] |
ZHANG Jing, GUO Zhen, WANG Si-hua, YUE Ming-hui, ZHANG Shan-shan, PENG Hui-hui, YIN Xiang, DU Juan*, MA Cheng-ye*. Comparison of Methods for Water Content in Rice by Portable Near-Infrared and Visible Light Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2059-2066. |
[6] |
HUANG Xiao-wei1, ZHANG Ning1, LI Zhi-hua1, SHI Ji-yong1, SUN Yue1, ZHANG Xin-ai1, ZOU Xiao-bo1, 2*. Detection of Carbendazim Residue in Apple Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Labeling Immunoassay[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1478-1484. |
[7] |
SHI Zhi-feng1, 2, LIU Jia2, XIAO Juan2, ZHENG Zhi-wen1*. Investigation of Novel Method for Detecting Vanillin Based on X-Ray Diffraction Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1563-1568. |
[8] |
WANG Yi-tao1, WU Cheng-zhao1, HU Dong1, SUN Tong1, 2*. Research Progress of Plasticizer Detection Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1298-1305. |
[9] |
DONG Xin-xin, YANG Fang-wei, YU Hang, YAO Wei-rong, XIE Yun-fei*. Study on Rapid Nondestructive Detection of Pork Lean Freshness Based on Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 484-488. |
[10] |
LIU Feng-xiang, HE Shuai, ZHANG Li-hao, HUANG Xia, SONG Yi-zhi*. Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3653-3658. |
[11] |
CHEN Yu-nan1, 2, 3, YANG Rui-fang1, 3*, ZHAO Nan-jing1, 3*, ZHU Wei1, 2, 3, CHEN Xiao-wei1, 2, 3, ZHANG Rui-qi1, 2, 3. Research on Measuring Oil Film Thickness Based on Laser-Induced Water Raman Suppression Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3954-3962. |
[12] |
ZHANG Qian, DONG Xiang-hui, YAO Wei-rong, YU Hang, XIE Yun-fei*. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Rapid Detection of Flunixin Meglumine Residues in Pork[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3155-3160. |
[13] |
HU Yu-xia1, CHEN Jie1, SHAO Hui1, YAN Pu1, XU Heng1, SUN Long1, XIAO Xiao1, XIU Lei3, FENG Chun2GAN Ting-ting2, ZHAO Nan-jing2*. Research Progress of Spectroscopy Detection Technologies for Waterborne Pathogens[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2672-2678. |
[14] |
DONG Xiang-hui, YANG Fang-wei, YU Hang, YAO Wei-rong, XIE Yun-fei*. Papid Detection of Zilpaterol Residues in Pork by Surface-Enhanced
Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2843-2847. |
[15] |
SHI Si-qian, YANG Fang-wei, YAO Wei-rong, YU Hang, XIE Yun-fei*. Rapid Detection of Levamisole Residue in Pork by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3759-3764. |
|
|
|
|