|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on Inversion of Water Conservation Capacity of Forest Litter in Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon Based on Spectral Features |
LONG Qian-qian1, ZHOU Ren-hao2, YUE De-peng1, NIU Teng1, MAO Xue-qing1, WANG Peng-chong3, YU Qiang1* |
1. Beijing Key Research Office of Precision Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Cyberspace Security Academy, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610200, China
3. Beijing Linmiao Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China |
|
|
Abstract Water conservation is an important part of the ecosystem service function. As a complex ecosystem, forests have different contributions to water conservation. The forest litter plays an important role in the water conservation function, for it directly covers the ground surface. Remote sensing and hyperspectral technology provide a solution for the long-distance detection of water conservation in planar areas. Especially in plateau areas, remote sensing is the most effective way to obtain surface information. In this paper, the hyperspectral data of main tree species were measured by ASD spectrometer in the Grand Canyon research area of Yarlung Zangbo. The litter samples were obtained by sampling on the plot and the water holding capacity of the samples was calculated. Use leaf spectrum information to construct vegetation index related to litter water conservation capacity, then establish multiple regression model of vegetation index and effective retention capacity, and invert the water conservation capacity distribution of main tree species in the Grand Canyon based on Sentinel-2 images. In the end, the accuracy of the inversion model is evaluated based on the verification points. The results showed that: (1) The reflectance of Quercusaqui folioides was the highest, the lowest was the Picea Linzhi, and the total reflectance trend of the three species was similar; (2) The effective interception amount of litter is sorted from large to small as follows: Picea Linzhi (48.36 t·ha-1)>Quercusaqui folioides (39.24 t·ha-1)>Pinus densata (32.32 t·ha-1). Picea Linzhi leaves are easy to decompose and store, Quercusaqui folioides’ leathery leaves and Pinus densata’s oily leaves are not conducive to decomposition. Therefore, the litter of Picea Linzhi has the highest effective interception amount. (3) Through the Person correlation coefficient analysis and the multiple linear regression model, it is found that the higher the wax parameters and attenuation degree of leaves, the weaker the water conservation capacity of litter; the better the vegetation growth trend, the higher the pigment and the water content of leaves, the stronger the water conservation capacity. (4) The results of the accuracy evaluation of the inversion model of the water conservation capacity of litter are good. R2 of the test points of Pinus densata, Picea Linzhi and Quercusaqui folioides is 0.943, 0.815 and 0.812, and RMSE is 1.597, 2.270 and 1.953. It shows that the model can be used for the prediction and distribution of the water conservation capacity of forest litter in Grand Canyon.
|
Received: 2021-04-13
Accepted: 2021-07-21
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YU Qiang
E-mail: yuqiang@bjfu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] ZHANG Biao, LI Wen-hua, XIE Gao-di, et al(张 彪,李文华,谢高地,等). Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2009, 28(3): 529.
[2] WU Qin-xiao, ZHAO Hong-yan, LIU Xiang-dong, et al(吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,刘向东,等). Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation(土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报), 1998,(2): 3.
[3] WEI Xiao-cha, ZHOU Qiu-wen, CUI Xing-fen, et al(韦小茶,周秋文,崔兴芬,等). Ecological Science(生态科学), 2017, 36(4): 120.
[4] ZHU Jin-zhao, LIU Jian-jun, ZHU Qing-ke, et al(朱金兆,刘建军,朱清科,等). Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 2002,(z1): 30.
[5] Neris J, Tejedor M, Rodríguez, et al. Catena, 2013, 108: 50.
[6] Dabney S M. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 1998, 53(3): 207.
[7] Li Xiang, Niu Jianzhi, Xie Baoyuan. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e70328.
[8] LIU Yu, ZHANG Hong-jiang, ZHANG You-yan, et al(刘 宇,张洪江,张友焱,等). Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation(水土保持通报), 2013, 33(6): 69.
[9] DENG Ji-feng, DING Guo-dong, WU Bin, et al(邓继峰,丁国栋,吴 斌,等). Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 2014, 36(2): 108.
[10] CHEN Li-qing, SUN Ze-ping, LI De-wen, et al(陈礼清,孙泽平,李德文,等). Resources and Environment of Yangtze River Basin(长江流域资源与环境), 2014, 23(7): 1048.
[11] HE Shu-qin, GONG Yuan-bo, ZHENG Zi-cheng(何淑勤,宫渊波,郑子成). Resources and Environment of Yangtze River Basin(长江流域资源与环境), 2020, 29(9): 1986.
[12] MA Jian-wei(马建威). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2017, 46(5): 666. |
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|