一种两阶段求解LED光谱匹配系数高效全局优化算法

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)06-1591-09

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3656 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The synthesis of the required target spectrum with monochromatic light-emitting diodes (LED) is of great significance in reality. When multiple components of the LEDs are needed, and the accuracy required for the target spectrum synthesis is high, solving the problem of the proportion of the components becomes a combination optimization problem with a non-negative solution of the over-determined set of linear equations. Generally speaking, the approximately global solutions can be found for the heuristic-based methods. However, the convergence speed to the worldwide optimizer is low partly because the objective functions' analysis properties, such as gradient information, are not used. Gradient-based algorithms converge to local solutions fast and with high accuracy, but the requirement for non-negative solutions in the problem limits their global convergence. Meanwhile, the least squares information of the objective function was not fully utilized in previous research. In this paper, a two-stage optimization algorithm, named LLR_LBFGS, is proposed based on the mathematical analytic properties, the quadratic nonlinear format of the objective function, and the non-negative requirements for the final solution. In the first stage, unconstrained linear fitting is carried out to obtain the unique solution of the least squares theory of the expressions. In the second stage, the non-negative global optimal solution of the problem is further obtained with the help of the constrained quasi-Newtonian method LBFGS. Taking the fitting of standard target spectra CIE-A, CIE-D65, CIE-D50, CIE-D55 and CIE-D75 as the research object, the new method is compared with the Lasso Regression Algorithm (LASSO), Ridge Regression Algorithm (RIDGE), Differential Evolution Algorithm (DE), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) in solving the same problem in terms of accuracy, running speed, and the decision coefficient R². The numerical results based on actual industrial cases show that the LLR_LBFGS converge faster, and the solution accuracy is higher because the information on the objective function is utilized more efficiently. Its universality indicates excellent potential to be applied more generally to solve the problem of LED spectral fitting. A more flexible solution to solve the spectral matching problem can be set up according to the design ideas of this paper. This also has significant implications for improving the effectiveness of intelligent optimization methods for finding the optimal solution for LED spectral matching.

Key words：Spectroscopy; LED spectral matching; Linear fitting; LBFGS; High effectiveness; Global optimization

Received: 2023-02-23 Accepted: 2023-10-12

ZTFLH:

O433.4

Corresponding Authors: WU Gui-wen E-mail: 302908829@qq.com

Cite this article:

WANG Yong-jun,WU Gui-wen,HUANG He, et al. A Two-Stage Efficient Global Optimization Algorithm for Solving LED Spectral Matching Coefficient[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(06): 1591-1599.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)06-1591-09 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2024/V44/I06/1591

[1] SONG Peng-cheng, WEN Shang-sheng, CHEN Ying-cong(宋鹏程, 文尚胜, 陈颖聪). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报)，2015, 5(9): 305.
[2] CHI Nan, LU Xing-yu, WANG Cai, et al(迟楠, 卢星宇, 王灿, 等). Chinese Journal of Laser(中国激光)，2017, 44(3): 7.
[3] SU Shi, ZHANG Guo-yu, WANG Ling-yun, et al(苏拾, 张国玉, 王凌云, 等). Laser & Optoelectronics Progress(激光与光电子学进展)，2018, 55(7): 40.
[4] International Commission on Illumination. CIE 015, Colorimetry, 4th ed. Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage. 2018.
[5] CHENG Zhen, SI Gan-shang, LI Zhen-gang, et al(程真, 司赶上, 李振钢, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2022, 42(9): 1.
[6] SHEN Hai-ping, FENG Hua-jun, PAN Jian-gen, et al(沈海平, 冯华君, 潘建根, 等). Proceedings of Approaching CIE 26th——Academic Annual Conference of China Lighting Society (2005)[走近CIE 26th中国照明学会（2005）学术年会论文集], 2005, 83.
[7] GAN Ru-ting，GUO Zhen-ning，LIN Jie-ben, et al(甘汝婷, 郭震宁, 林介本, 等). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2014, 43(7): 6 (doi: 10.3788/gzxb20144307.0730003).
[8] GUO Zhen-ning, LIAO Xuan, GAN Ru-ting, et al(郭震宁, 廖炫, 甘汝婷, 等). Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science)[华侨大学学报（自然科学版)], 2016, 37(6): 731.
[9] ZHANG Yi-wen, XU Lin, WAN Song(张译文, 徐林, 万松). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2013, 42(5): 596.
[10] TANG Lu-yao, SU Cheng-yue, CHEN Shao-fan, et al(汤露瑶, 苏成悦, 陈少藩, 等). China Illuminating Engineering Journal(照明工程学报)，2017, 28(5): 4.
[11] GAO Yuan, DONG Jian-fei, WU Hai-ning, et al(高源, 董建飞, 吴海宁，等). China Light & Lighting(中国照明电器)，2015, (11): 15.
[12] NI Jun-xiong, BAI Ting-zhu, XU Ying-ying(倪俊雄, 白廷柱, 徐英莹). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2012, 32(6): 1606.
[13] GAO Hang, XUE Ling-yun(高航, 薛凌云). Laser & Optoelectronics Progress(激光与光电子学进展)，2017, 54(7): 294.
[14] Li W, Wang G G, Gandomi A H. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering，2021, 28: 3781.
[15] Byrd R H, Lu P, Nocedal J, et al. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 1995, 16(5): 1190.
[16] Psaros A F, Meng X, Zou Z, et al. Journal of Computational Physics，2023, 477: 111902.
[17] Tibshirani R. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology，1996, 58(1): 267.
[18] Hoerl A E，Kennard R W. Technometrics, 1970, 12: 55.
[19] Storn R, Price K. Journal of Global Optimization，1997, 11(4): 341.
[20] Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Proceedings of ICNN'95—International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, 4: 1942.