|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural Characteristics Change and Spectral Response Analysis of Maize Canopy under Lodging Stress |
SHU Mei-yan1, 2, 3, 4, GU Xiao-he1, 2, 3*, SUN Lin4, ZHU Jin-shan4, YANG Gui-jun1, 2, 3, WANG Yan-cang5, SUN Qian1, ZHOU Long-fei1 |
1.Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
2. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
3. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China
4. Shandong University of Science and Technology College of Geomatics,Qingdao 266590, China
5.North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering College of Computer and Remote Sensing Information Technology,Langfang 065000, China |
|
|
Abstract Lodging stress is one of the main disasters in maize production, which seriously affects the yield and quality of maize and mechanical harvesting ability. It is the basis of remote sensing monitoring of maize large-scale lodging disasters to analyze the changes of maize canopy structure and spectral response characteristics under different lodging stress. Stem lodging, stem fold and root lodging were set up in the tasseling stage and the middle filling period. Based on the field continuous observation experiments, the effects of growth stages and lodging types on dynamic changes of canopy structure and self-recovery ability of maize were analyzed. Hyperspectral data of lodging maize canopy were processed by the traditional spectral transformation and continuous wavelet transform. Leaf area density (LAD) was taken as the index of the lodging maize canopy structure characteristics. The best sensitive bands and wavelet coefficients of leaf area density were selected. The hyperspectral response model of leaf area density was constructed based on random forest method, andthe accuracy of the model was verified by the measured samples which were not involvedin modeling. Focus on the influence of wavelet decomposition scale and spectral resolution on LAD spectral response ability. The results showed that leaf area density, as a canopy structure indicator of total leaf area per unit volume, had a good response relationship with lodging stress intensity. The LAD of lodging maize in the filling stage was generally higher than that in the tasseling stage. The LAD of the tasseling stage was as follows: stem fold>root lodging>stem lodging>no lodging. The LAD of the filling stage was as follows: root lodging>stem fold>stem lodging>no lodging. After continuous wavelet transform, the response ability of maize lodging canopy spectrum to leaf area density is generally better than that of traditional spectral transform. The response ability of lodging maize canopy spectrum to leaf area density after continuous wavelet transform is generally better than that of traditional spectral transform. As the wavelet decomposition scale increases, the correlation between LAD and sensitive bands is stronger, and the correlation coefficient of 10 scale is the highest, reaching 0.74. The accuracy of the model constructed by continuous wavelet transform is generally better than that of traditional spectral transform. The model constructed by the original spectral wavelet transform has the highest precision, the R2 of test sample is 0.811, and the RMSE is 1.763. It showed that continuous wavelet transform technology can highlight and utilize the subtle information in the canopy spectra. Therefore, leaf area density can effectively quantify the variation characteristics ofmaize canopy structure under different lodging stress. Continuous wavelet transform can effectively improve the response of the canopy spectrum to the structural parameters of the lodging maize. The model of lodging maize leaf area density based on random forest method has high accuracy and stability, which can provide prior knowledge for remote sensing monitoring of summer maize lodging disaster at regional scale.
|
Received: 2018-10-09
Accepted: 2019-01-28
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GU Xiao-he
E-mail: guxh@nercita.org.cn
|
|
[1] CAO Tie-hua, LIANG Ju-he, LI Gang, et al(曹铁华, 梁炬赫, 李 刚, 等) . Journal of Maize Sciences(玉米科学), 2013,(6): 81.
[2] YANG Yang, YANG Jian-yu, LI Shao-ming, et al(杨 扬, 杨建宇, 李绍明, 等) . Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2011, 27(6): 244.
[3] CHEN Bi-mei, LAO Shang-ye(陈碧梅, 劳赏业) . Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology(农业灾害研究), 2015, 5(4): 5.
[4] YANG Fen-tuan, GU Xiao-he, LI Gang, et al(杨粉团, 顾晓鹤, 李 刚, 等). Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences(江苏农业科学), 2016, 44(3): 85.
[5] Chu T, Starek M J, Brewer M J, et al. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(9): 923.
[6] WANG Li-zhi, GU Xiao-he, HU Sheng-wu, et al(王立志, 顾晓鹤, 胡圣武, 等) . Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2016, 49(21): 4120.
[7] LI Zong-nan, CHEN Zhong-xin, REN Guo-ye, et al(李宗南, 陈仲新, 任国业, 等) . Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(2): 1.
[8] LIU Zhan-yu, HUANG Jing-feng, WANG Fu-min, et al(刘占宇, 黄敬峰, 王福民, 等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2008, 41(10): 3350.
[9] HU Zong-jie, ZHANG Jie, WANG Zhao-hai, et al(胡宗杰, 张 杰, 王召海) . Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences(安徽农业科学), 2011, 39(6): 3190.
[10] WANG Hong-shu, LI Shi-hua, GUO Jia-wei, et al(王洪蜀, 李世华, 郭加伟, 等) . Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2016, 20(4): 570.
[11] WU Zi-kai(吴子恺) . Journal of Bayi Agricultural College(八一农学报学报), 1984,(2):71.
[12] YANG Xiu-fang, ZHANG Wei, YANG Yu-xiang(杨秀芳, 张 伟, 杨宇祥) . Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2014, 34(3): 292.
[13] Breiman L. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5. |
[1] |
ZHU Wen-jing1, 2,FENG Zhan-kang1, 2,DAI Shi-yuan1, 2,ZHANG Ping-ping3,JI Wen4,WANG Ai-chen1, 2,WEI Xin-hua1, 2*. Multi-Feature Fusion Detection of Wheat Lodging Information Based on UAV Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 197-206. |
[2] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[3] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[4] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[5] |
WANG Hong-jian1, YU Hai-ye1, GAO Shan-yun1, LI Jin-quan1, LIU Guo-hong1, YU Yue1, LI Xiao-kai1, ZHANG Lei1, ZHANG Xin1, LU Ri-feng2, SUI Yuan-yuan1*. A Model for Predicting Early Spot Disease of Maize Based on Fluorescence Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3710-3718. |
[6] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[7] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[8] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[9] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[10] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[11] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[12] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[13] |
YAN Xing-guang, LI Jing*, YAN Xiao-xiao, MA Tian-yue, SU Yi-ting, SHAO Jia-hao, ZHANG Rui. A Rapid Method for Stripe Chromatic Aberration Correction in
Landsat Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3483-3491. |
[14] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[15] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
|
|
|
|