光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adaptive EEMD Residue Related Baseline Correction Algorithm |
ZHAO Xiao-yu1,2, FANG Yi-ming1, GUAN Yong3, WANG Zhi-gang4, TONG Liang5, TAN Feng2 |
1. Institute of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China 2. College of Information Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China 3. Daqing Petrochemical Engineering Co., Ltd., Daqing 163317, China 4. College of Life Science and Forestry, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China 5. Communication and Electronic Engineering Institute, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China |
|
|
Abstract Baseline correction is an important part of spectral analysis; the existing algorithms usually need to set the key parameters and does not have adaptability. The spectral baseline is fitted by the residue according to the feature of ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD for short). The correlation between residual and original signal, the self-correlation and the crosscorrelation of residual form the residual related rule. The residual related rule is proposed to judge whether the residual is a component of baseline, based on which adaptive EEMD residual related base line algorithm is proposed. With experiment on the simulated spectrum data of superimposing curve background and the linear background, the results showed that in the case of known baseline mathematical assumption: EEMD residual related method is not so good for polynomial fitting, it is almost no difference from linear fitting, but is better than the wavelet decomposition. In the absence of spectral background knowledge, the real Raman spectrum data are tested. The model is established between Raman spectra treated by the procedure above and chlorophyll, and the model corrected by EEMD residual related baseline method has the biggest correlation coefficient and prediction coefficient, but the smallest root mean square error of cross validation and relative prediction deviation. The effect of EEMD residual related baseline method effects on the peak position, peak intensity and peak width is the smallest in all kinds of baseline correction methods. EEMD residual method has the best baseline correction effect. Experiments show that this algorithm can be used for Raman spectra baseline correction, without prior knowledge of the sample composition analysis, and there is no need to select appropriate fitting function, fitting data points, fitting order as well as basis function and decomposition levels, also there is no need of mathematical hypothesis of baseline signal distribution, so the adaptability is very strong.
|
Received: 2013-10-23
Accepted: 2014-02-04
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHAO Xiao-yu
E-mail: xy-zhao@163.com
|
|
[1] WANG Zhi-hong, ZHOU Feng-dao(王智宏, 周逢道). Journal of Jilin University·Engineering and Technology Edition(吉林大学学报·工学版), 2009, 39(4): 982. [2] MA Heng, WANG Zhi-bin, ZHANG Ji-long(马 恒, 王志斌, 张记龙). Laser Technology(激光技术), 2013, 37(2): 223. [3] LI Jin-rong, DAI Lian-kui, RUAN Hua(李津蓉, 戴连奎, 阮 华). Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China) (化工学报), 2012, 63(7): 2128. [4] Wu Zhaohua, Huang N E. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2009, 1(1): 1. [5] Huang N E, Zheng Shen, Long S R, et al. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London, 1998, 454: 903. [6] WANG Rui-qing, ZHANG Ying-chun, WEI Shou-shui(王瑞卿, 张迎春, 魏守水). Journal of Data Acquisition & Processing(数据采集与处理), 2009, 24(3): 380. [7] HU Yao-gai, ZHAO Zheng-yu, WANG Gang(胡耀垓, 赵正予, 王 刚). Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology·Nature Science Edition(华中科技大学学报·自然科学版), 2011, 39(6): 36. [8] FANG Yong-hua, KONG Chao, LAN Tian-ge(方勇华, 孔 超, 兰天鸽). Optics and Precision Engineering(光学 精密工程), 2006, 14(6): 1088. |
[1] |
LIAN Xiao-qin1, 2, CHEN Yan-ming1, 2, WANG Yu-qiao1, 2, LIU Yu1, 2. Research on ICP-AES Spectral Baseline Correction Method Based on DE Algorithm and NURBS Curve[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 260-267. |
[2] |
CHEN Su-yi, LI Hao-ran, DAI Ji-sheng*. Baseline Correction Method Based on Block Sparse Signal Recovery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3730-3735. |
[3] |
HE Nian, SHAN Peng*, HE Zhong-hai, WANG Qiao-yun, LI Zhi-gang, WU Zhui. Study on the Fractional Baseline Correction Method of ATR-FTIR
Spectral Signal in the Fermentation Process of Sodium Glutamate[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1848-1854. |
[4] |
JIANG Cheng1, TANG Gui-qian2*, LI Qi-hua1*, LIU Bao-xian3, WANG Meng2, WANG Yue-si2. Vertical Profile of Aerosol in Spring in Beijing Based on Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 265-271. |
[5] |
JIAO Qing-liang1, LIU Ming1*, YU Kun2, LIU Zi-long2, 3, KONG Ling-qin1, HUI Mei1, DONG Li-quan1, ZHAO Yue-jin1. Spectral Pre-Processing Based on Convolutional Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 292-297. |
[6] |
KONG Hui-hua1, 2, LIAN Xiang-yuan1, CHEN Ping2, PAN Jin-xiao1, 2. Research on Color Characterization of Material Components Based on Spectral CT[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3612-3617. |
[7] |
LIU Long1, FAN Xian-guang1, 2*, KANG Zhe-ming1, WU Yi1, WANG Xin1, 2*. Baseline Correction Algorithm for Raman Spectroscopy Based on Adaptive Window Spline Fitting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 111-115. |
[8] |
WANG Yuan1, 2, 3, WANG Jin-liang1, 2, 3*. Chlorophyll Fluorescence-Spectral Characteristics of Vegetables Under Different Fertilizer Treatments[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2427-2433. |
[9] |
ZHAO Man1, GUO Yi-xin1, HE Yu-qing1*, GUO Hong1, JIN Wei-qi1, REN Lin-mao1,2. Baseline Correction of UV Raman Spectrum Based on Improved Piecewise Linear Fitting[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(06): 1862-1868. |
[10] |
ZHANG Zi-peng, DING Jian-li*, WANG Jing-zhe, GE Xiang-yu, LI Zhen-shan. Quantitative Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content Using Three-Dimensional Spectral Index: A Case Study of the Ebinur Lake Basin in Xinjiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(05): 1514-1522. |
[11] |
YE Fa-wang1, WANG Jian-gang1, QIU Jun-ting1, ZHANG Chuan1, YU Xin-qi2, LIU Xiu2. Study on Correlation Between Total Organic Carbon, Soluble Hydrocarbon, Pyrolytic Hydrocarbon Content and Spectral Index in Source Rocks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(04): 1001-1006. |
[12] |
ZHANG Fang1,2, HU Zuo-le1,2, WANG Dong-sheng1,2, LIU Yu-meng1,2, XIE Yun-xin1,2, ZHUO Hui-hui2, HE Man-chao1*. Comparative Analysis of Near-Infrared Spectral Characteristics of Water-Bearing Rocks with Different Lithologies[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(03): 971-979. |
[13] |
ZHANG Fang1, 2, HU Zuo-le1, 2, HOU Xin-li3, ZHANG Xiu-lian1, 2, FU Cheng-gong1, 2, LI Ying-jun1, 4, HE Man-chao1. Feature Selection of Near-Infrared Spectra of Rock with Different Water Contents[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(11): 3395-3402. |
[14] |
YANG Chang-bao1, GAO Wen-bo1*, HOU Guang-yu2, LI Xing-zhe1, GAO Man-ting1. Response Relationship between Feldspar Content and Characteristic Spectra in Igneous Rocks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(07): 2077-2082. |
[15] |
MA Rui-jun, ZHANG Ya-li, CHEN Yu*, ZHANG Ya-li, QIU Zhi, XIAO Jin-qing. Experimental Study on Detection of Chlorpyrifos Concentration in Water by Hyperspectral Technique Based on Characteristic Band[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(03): 923-930. |
|
|
|
|