基于特征波段的高光谱技术检测水体中毒死蜱浓度的实验研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)03-0923-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3028 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to investigate the feasibility of reflectance spectroscopy for the detection of chlorpyrifos pesticides in water, indoor and outdoor spectral data of chlorpyrifos samples in two different concentrations were obtained using a hyperspectral acquisition system composed of ASD’s FieldSpecPro Spectrometer. The partial least squares (PLS) and principal component analysis (PCA) algorithms were used to establish quantitative models for spectral data of chlorpyrifos samples. The results showed that the predictable ability of the model is significantly reliable. Correlation analysis (CA) was used to calculate the correlation coefficient to select the characteristic wavelength of the spectrum of chlorpyrifos samples. The characteristic wavelengths of indoor and outdoor experimental spectra with concentration ranges of 5～75 mg·L^-1 were 388, 1 080, 1 276 and 356, 1 322, 1 693 nm, respectively. And the characteristic wavelengths were 367, 1 070, 1 276, 1 708, and 383, 1 081, 1 250, 1 663 nm in the range of 0.1～100 mg·L^-1 experiments. The PLS algorithm was used to establish a quantitative model of the sample characteristic wavelength spectral data. Compared with the full-band model, the calibration set determination coefficient (R²_C) of the PLS characteristic wavelength model with concentration range of 5～75 mg·L^-1 was increased to 0.987 5 and 0.999 2 in the indoor and outdoor experiment, respectively. And the prediction set determination coefficient (R²_P) was increased to 0.989 4 and 0.994 4, respectively. The root mean square error of the calibration set (RMSEC) was reduced to 2.841 and 0.714, respectively. The root mean square error of the prediction set (RMSEP) was reduced to 1.715 and 1.244, respectively. The R²_C of the characteristic wavelength PLS model with concentration range of 0.1～100 mg·L^-1 in the indoor and outdoor experiment was increased to 0.998 3 and 0.998 8, respectively. The R²_P was increased to 0.998 4 and 0.999 0, respectively, and the RMSEC of the correction set was reduced to 1.383 and 1.186, respectively, and the RMSEP of the prediction set was reduced to 1.510 and 1.229, respectively. The ratio of standard deviation of the validation set to standard error of prediction (RPD) were increased, especially for experiments with a concentration range of 0.1～100 mg·L^-1. The RPD value increased to 21.7 significantly, indicating that the quantitative model based on the characteristic wavelength has higher accuracy of prediction ability. However, comparative experiments with different concentration ranges show that the relative error of the low-concentration chlorpyrifos solution prediction by the ASD spectrograph is large and there is an objective detection limit. In order to ensure that the characteristic wavelengths of chlorpyrifos pesticides under different experimental conditions are analyzed and the universality and robustness of the model are enhanced, four bands are selected according to the characteristic wavelengths, that is, 351～393, 1 065～1 086, 1 245～1 281 and 1 658～1 713 nm used as characteristic bands. The characteristic band model has a total of 38 wavelength variables. Compared with the 432 wavelength variables of the full-band model, the model variable was reduced by 91.2%. The R²_C of indoor and outdoor experimental PLS models with concentration range of 5～75 mg·L^-1 were 0.993 7 and 0.987 8, and R²_P were 0.979 8 and 0.998 2, and RMSEC were 1.69 and 2.516, and RMSEP were 1.987 and 0.659, respectively. The R²_C values of the experimental PLS model with concentration range of 0.1～100 mg·L^-1 were 0.988 2 and 0.980 7 for the indoor and outdoor experiments, and the R²_P were 0.939 1 and 0.993 6, and the RMSEC were 3.345 and 3.942, and the RMSEP were 8.996 and 2.663, respectively. All of the model RPD values were more than 2.5 and met the quantitative analysis conditions. Therefore, the hyperspectral system of the paper for the rapid detection of chlorpyrifos pesticides in indoor and outdoor environments has a certain feasibility. The results of this study have practical application value for the rapid detection of non-point source pollutants such as organic phosphorus pesticides, which can provide a theoretical basis for the development of an instrument for the rapid detection of organophosphorus pesticides in farmland water.

Key words：Hyper-spectrum; Chlorpyrifos; Partial least squares; Correlation analysis; Quantitative model; Characteristic wavelength; Characteristic band

Received: 2018-06-02 Accepted: 2018-10-30

ZTFLH:

O657.3

Corresponding Authors: CHEN Yu E-mail: chenyu219@126.com

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)03-0923-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2019/V39/I03/923

[1] John E M, Shaike J M. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2015, 13(3): 269.
[2] Liang X, Xu L, Li H, et al. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2011, 36(9-11): 395.
[3] LIU Hong-bin, ZOU Guo-yuan, FAN Xian-peng, et al(刘洪斌，邹国元，范先鹏，等). Establishment and Application of Monitoring Technology on Nonpoint Pollution from Arable Land(农田面源污染监测方法与实践). Beijing：Science Press(北京：科学出版社), 2015.
[4] LI Jun-jie, HOU Chang-jun, HUO Dan-qun, et al(李俊杰，侯长军，霍丹群，等). Journal of Food Safety & Quality(食品安全质量检测学报), 2013, 4(1): 19.
[5] Nan J X, Wang J, Piao X F, et al. Talanta, 2015, 142: 64.
[6] Zhang L, Wang Y, Sun C, et al. Food Analytical Methods, 2013，(6): 1508.
[7] Zheng Q Q, Yu Y H, Fan K, et al. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016, 408(21): 5819.
[8] Wei M, Wang J J. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2015, 211: 290.
[9] ZHANG Ling-biao, HE Jian-guo, LIU Gui-shan, et al(张令标，何建国，刘贵珊, 等). Food and Machinery(食品与机械), 2014，(1): 82.
[10] WANG Hai-yang, LIU Yan-de, ZHANG Yu-xiang(王海阳，刘燕德，张宇翔). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2017, 33(2): 291.
[11] Weng S Z, Li M, Chen C, et al. Royal Society of Chemicstry, 2015, 6(7): 2563.
[12] Shao Y N, LI Y, Jiang L J, et al. Water Research, 2016, 104: 432.
[13] HU Rong-ming, GUO Jiang-bo, HUANG Yuan-cheng, et al(胡荣明，郭江波，黄远程，等). Chinese Journal of Posticide Science(农药学学报), 2015, 17(5): 563.
[14] ZHOU Qing, ZHOU Bin, WANG Ren-chao, et al(周清，周斌，王人潮，等). Journal of South China Agricultural University(华南农业大学学报), 2005, 26(1): 31.
[15] CHU Xiao-li(褚小立). Molecular Spectroscopy Analytical Technology Combined with Chemometrics and Its Applications(化学计量学方法与分子光谱分析技术). Beijing：Chemical Industry Press(北京：化学工业出版社), 2011.
[16] Malley D F, Ronicke H, Findlay D L, et al. Journal of Paleolimnology, 1999, 21(3): 295.