| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Multifractal Analysis of Rapeseed Spectrum for Chlorophyll Diagnosis Modeling |
| WANG Xiao-qiao1,2,4, WANG Fang1,3, LIAO Gui-ping1,3*, GUAN Chun-yun1,2 |
1. Hunan Agricultural University/Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, Changsha 410128, China
2. School of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3. School of Science, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
4. School of Management, Hunan Science and Technology University, Xiangtan 411201, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract One of the most important topics in crop information science is how to make use of the crop’s information for non-destructive nutrient diagnosiswhich can be solved with spectrum analysis. The canopy’s spectrum feature is a key indicator to describe the nutritional status for the rapeseeds. The original spectrum is to be disturbed with external factors such as environment and climate; however, it is difficult to be directly used for rapeseed biomass diagnosis due to its huge fluctuation. However, the multifractal feature of the spectra remains stable relatively. In order to study the relationship between the canopy’s spectrum of the rapeseed and its chlorophyll, based on the multifractal theory, a quantitative model of chlorophyll prediction and a qualitative model of planting pattern identification were proposed in this paper to study the high oleic acid rapeseed samples in 24 transplanting regions and 24 direct planting regions. At first, the generalized Hurst exponent and mass exponents together with other relevant multifractal parameters of the spectra were extracted with popular multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MF-DFA) in different six considered wavelength ranges. It shows that all of them possess representative multifractal nature. However, there are some differences of the multifractal characteristics between the two kinds of regions with different planting pattern in some bands. In addition, by correlation analysis and detection between the multifractal parameters of the spectra and the SPAD values in six considered ranges of bands, it demonstrates that there is some difference of the effective information content in the different ranges of bands. In the quantitative model of chlorophyll prediction, for each groups of samples in transplanting regions and direct planting regions and mixed together in each significant bands, a selected multifractal parameter was used to establish the univariate model for predicting the rapeseed leaf’s SPAD values, respectively. The results of all the relative root mean square errors are small than 5%. Finally, the qualitative model was proposed to distinguish the samples by the two planting pattern. Youden index, as the identification accuracy was calculated for the six considered ranges of bands by the Fisher’s linear discriminant analysis. The best Youden index is 0.902 5 and the corresponding band range is 350~1 350 nm. The significant work provides a theoretical and practical method for predicting rapeseed leaf’s SPAD and also provides effective way to find the sensitive bands of the spectra for identification diagnosis.
|
|
Received: 2015-10-23
Accepted: 2016-02-11
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIAO Gui-ping
E-mail: lgpxf@hunau.net
|
|
[1] Spomer L A, Smith M A L, Sawwan J S. Photosynth. Res., 1988, 16: 277.
[2] Pagola M, Ortiz R, Irigoyen I, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture，2008, 65(2)：213.
[3] Vigneau N, Ecarnot M, Rabatel G, et al. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122(1): 25.
[4] Glenn Fitzgerald, Daniel Rodriguez, Garry O’Leary. Field Crops Research，2010, 116(3): 318.
[5] Zhang Xiaolei, Liu Fei, Nie Pengcheng, et al. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal., 2014, 34(9): 2513.
[6] Cilia C, Panigada C, Rossini M, et al. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6(7): 6549.
[7] Zhao Huijie, Cai Hui, Li Na. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astroautics，2012, 10: 11.
[8] Mandelbrot B B. Science, 1967, 156(3775): 636.
[9] Liu Xiaogang, Zhao Huijie, Li Na. Acta Optica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 844.
[10] Kantelhardt J W, Zschiegner S A, Koscielny-Bunde, et al. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications，2002, 316(1/2/3/4): 87.
[11] Wang Fang, Liao Guiping, Zhou Xiaoyang, et al. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 72(1/2): 353.
[12] Wang Fang, Liao Guiping, Li Jianhui, et al. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications，2013, 392(22)：5723.
[13] Wang Fang, Li Zongshou, Li Jinwei. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 233: 116.
[14] Wang Fang, Liao Dengwen, Li Jinwei, et al. Plant Methods, 2015, 11：12. |
| [1] |
ZHENG Hong-quan, DAI Jing-min*. Research Development of the Application of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Measurement of Trace Gas Concentration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 1-14. |
| [2] |
CHENG Jia-wei1, 2，LIU Xin-xing1, 2*，ZHANG Juan1, 2. Application of Infrared Spectroscopy in Exploration of Mineral Deposits: A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 15-21. |
| [3] |
FAN Ping-ping，LI Xue-ying，QIU Hui-min，HOU Guang-li，LIU Yan*. Spectral Analysis of Organic Carbon in Sediments of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea by Different Spectrometers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 52-55. |
| [4] |
LI Jie, ZHOU Qu*, JIA Lu-fen, CUI Xiao-sen. Comparative Study on Detection Methods of Furfural in Transformer Oil Based on IR and Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 125-133. |
| [5] |
BAI Xi-lin1, 2, PENG Yue1, 2, ZHANG Xue-dong1, 2, GE Jing1, 2*. Ultrafast Dynamics of CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots and Quantum
Dot-Acceptor Molecular Complexes[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 56-61. |
| [6] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
| [7] |
YANG Cheng-en1, 2, LI Meng3, LU Qiu-yu2, WANG Jin-ling4, LI Yu-ting2*, SU Ling1*. Fast Prediction of Flavone and Polysaccharide Contents in
Aronia Melanocarpa by FTIR and ELM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 62-68. |
| [8] |
WANG Fang-yuan1, 2, HAN Sen1, 2, YE Song1, 2, YIN Shan1, 2, LI Shu1, 2, WANG Xin-qiang1, 2*. A DFT Method to Study the Structure and Raman Spectra of Lignin
Monomer and Dimer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 76-81. |
| [9] |
LIU Zhen1*, LIU Li2*, FAN Shuo2, ZHAO An-ran2, LIU Si-lu2. Training Sample Selection for Spectral Reconstruction Based on Improved K-Means Clustering[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 29-35. |
| [10] |
YANG Chao-pu1, 2, FANG Wen-qing3*, WU Qing-feng3, LI Chun1, LI Xiao-long1. Study on Changes of Blue Light Hazard and Circadian Effect of AMOLED With Age Based on Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 36-43. |
| [11] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
| [12] |
ZHENG Pei-chao, YIN Yi-tong, WANG Jin-mei*, ZHOU Chun-yan, ZHANG Li, ZENG Jin-rui, LÜ Qiang. Study on the Method of Detecting Phosphate Ions in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum Combined With SPA-ELM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 82-87. |
| [13] |
XU Qiu-yi1, 3, 4, ZHU Wen-yue3, 4, CHEN Jie2, 3, 4, LIU Qiang3, 4 *, ZHENG Jian-jie3, 4, YANG Tao2, 3, 4, YANG Teng-fei2, 3, 4. Calibration Method of Aerosol Absorption Coefficient Based on
Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 88-94. |
| [14] |
LI Xin-ting, ZHANG Feng, FENG Jie*. Convolutional Neural Network Combined With Improved Spectral
Processing Method for Potato Disease Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 215-224. |
| [15] |
XING Hai-bo1, ZHENG Bo-wen1, LI Xin-yue1, HUANG Bo-tao2, XIANG Xiao2, HU Xiao-jun1*. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Channel Sensing Detection of Pyrene in
Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 95-102. |
|
|
|
|
