光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction of SPAD Value in Oilseed Rape Leaves Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique |
DING Xi-bin, LIU Fei, ZHANG Chu, HE Yong* |
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
Abstract In the present work, prediction models of SPAD value (Soil and Plant Analyzer Development, often used as a parameter to indicate chlorophyll content) in oilseed rape leaves were successfully built using hyperspectral imaging technique. The hyperspectral images of 160 oilseed rape leaf samples in the spectral range of 380~1030 nm were acquired.Average spectrum was extracted from the region of interest(ROI) of each sample.We chose spectral data in the spectral range of 500~900 nm for analysis. Using Monte Carlo partial least squares(MC-PLS) algorithm, 13 samples were identified as outliers and eliminated. Based on the spectral information and measured SPAD values of the rest 147 samples, several estimation models have been built based on different parameters using different algorithms for comparison,including: (1) a SPAD value estimation model based on partial least squares(PLS) in the whole wavelength region of 500~900 nm; (2) a SPAD value estimation model based on successive projections algorithmcombined with PLS(SPA-PLS); (3) 4 kind of simple experience SPAD value estimation models in which red edge position was used as an argument; (4) 4 kind of simple experience SPAD value estimation models in which three vegetation indexes R710/R760,(R750-R705)/(R750-R705) and R860/(R550×R708), which all have been proved to have a good relevance with chlorophyll content, were used as an argument respectively; (5) a SPAD value estimation model based on PLS using the 3 vegetation indexes mentioned above. The results indicate that the optimal prediction performance is achieved by PLS model in the whole wavelength region of 500~900 nm, which has a correlation coefficient(rp) of 0.833 9 and a root mean squares error of predicted(RMSEP) of 1.52. The SPA-PLS model can provide avery close prediction result while the calibration computation has been significantly reduced and the calibration speed has been accelerated sharply. For simple experience models based on red edge parameters and vegetation indexes, although there is a slight gap between theprediction performance and that of the PLS model in the whole wavelength region of 500~900 nm, they also have their own unique advantages which should be thought highly of: these models are much simpler and thus the calibration computation is reduced significantly, they can perform an important function under circumstances in which increasing modeling speed and reducing calibration computation operand are more important than improving the prediction accuracy, such as the development of portable devices.
|
Received: 2013-11-21
Accepted: 2014-02-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HE Yong
E-mail: yhe@zju.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Vane G, Alexander F H G. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1993, 44(2): 117. [2] Scott C C, Hector J B. Agronomy Journal, 1997, 89(4): 557. [3] Peng S, Garcia F V, Laza R C, et al. Agronomy Journal, 1993, 85(5): 987. [4] Horler D N H, Barber J, Barringer A R. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1980, 1(2): 121. [5] Curran P J, Dungan J L, Gholz H L. Tree Physiology, 1990, 7(1-4): 33. [6] Zou X, Shi J, Hao L, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2011, 706: 105. [7] LIU Fei, NIE Peng-cheng, HE Yong, et al.(刘 飞, 聂鹏程, 何 勇, 等). Science China Information Sciences(中国科学:信息科学), 2011, 54(3): 598. [8] Guo W L, Du Y P, Zhou Y C, et al. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2012, 28: 993. [9] David M H, Edward V T. Analytical Chemistry, 1988, 60(11): 1193. [10] Liu F, Kong W W, He Y. Sensor Letters, 2011, 9(3): 1126. [11] Araujo M C U, Saldanha T C B, Galvao R K H, et al. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 2001, 57(2): 65. [12] QIAN Hai-bo, SUN Lai-jun, WANG Le-kai, et al(钱海波, 孙来军, 王乐凯, 等). Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin(中国农学通报), 2011, 27(18): 51. [13] YAO Fu-qi, ZHANG Zhen-hua, YANG Run-ya, et al(姚付启, 张振华, 杨润亚, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2009, 25(Supp. 2): 123. [14] HUANG Wen-jiang, WANG Ji-hua, ZHAO Chun-jiang, et al(黄文江, 王纪华, 赵春江, 等). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2003, 18(4): 206. [15] ZHU Xi-cun, ZHAO Geng-xing, JIANG Yuan-mao, et al(朱西存, 赵庚星, 姜远茂, 等). Infrared(Monthly)(红外) , 2011, 32(12): 31. [16] Daniel A S, John A G. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81: 337. [17] ZHANG Lian-peng, LIU Qin-huo, WANG De-gao, et al(张连蓬, 柳钦火, 王德高, 等). Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping(测绘通报), 2010, 9: 1.
|
[1] |
HUANG Yu-ping1,3, Renfu Lu2, QI Chao1, CHEN Kun-jie1*. Tomato Maturity Classification Based on Spatially Resolved Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(07): 2183-2188. |
[2] |
HUANG Di-yun, LI Jing-bin*, YOU Jia, KAN Za. The Classification of Delinted Cottonseeds Varieties by Fusing Image Information Based on Hyperspectral Image Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(07): 2227-2232. |
[3] |
GAO Pan1, ZHANG Chu3, Lü Xin2*, ZHANG Ze2, HE Yong3*. Visual Identification of Slight-Damaged Cotton Seeds Based on Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(06): 1712-1718. |
[4] |
PENG Jian1, 2, XU Fei-xiong1* , DENG Kai2, WU Jian2, LI Wei-tao2, WANG Ni2, LIU Min-shi2. Spectral Differences of Tree Leaves at Different Chlorophyll Relative Content in Langya Mountain[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(06): 1839-1849. |
[5] |
LI Zhe1, 2, ZHANG Fei1, 2, 3*, CHEN Li-hua4, ZHANG Hai-wei1, 2. Research on Spectrum Variance of Vegetation Leaves and Estimation Model for Leaf Chlorophyll Content Based on the Spectral Index[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(05): 1533-1539. |
[6] |
ZHANG Jian1, 2, MENG Jin1, 2, ZHAO Bi-quan1, 2, ZHANG Dong-yan3, XIE Jing4*. Research on the Chlorophyll Content (SPAD) Distribution Based on the Consumer-Grade Modified Near-Infrared Camera[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(03): 737-744. |
[7] |
WANG Xiao-bin1, 2, 3, 4, 5,HUANG Wen-qian2, 3, 4, 5,WANG Qing-yan2, 3, 4, 5,LI Jiang-bo2, 3, 4, 5,WANG Chao-peng2, 3, 4, 5,ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2, 3, 4, 5*. Application of Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging for Detection of Azodicarbonamidein Flour[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(03): 805-812. |
[8] |
CONG Lin-xiao1,2, HUANG Min1*, LIU Xiang-lei1, QI Yun-song1. Retrieval of Soil Organic Carbon Based on Bi-Continuum Removal Combined with Orthogonal Partial Least Squares[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(03): 941-947. |
[9] |
MEI Cong-li1,2, CHEN Yao2, YIN Liang2, JIANG Hui2, CHEN Xu2, DING Yu-han2, LIU Guo-hai2. Wavelength Selection by siPLS-LASSO for NIR Spectroscopy and Its Application[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(02): 436-440. |
[10] |
SUN Gui-fen1, QIN Xian-lin1*, YIN Ling-yu1, LIU Shu-chao1, LI Zeng-yuan1, CHEN Xiao-zhong2, ZHONG Xiang-qing2. Changes Analysis of Post-Fire Vegetation Spectrum and Index Based on Time Series GF-1 WFV Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(02): 511-517. |
[11] |
FENG Xu-ping1, 2, PENG Cheng3, ZHANG Chu1, 2, LIU Xiao-dan1, 2, SHEN Ting-ting1, 2, HE Yong1, 2*, XU Jun-feng3. A Simple and Efficient Method for CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Rice Mutant Screening[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(02): 570-574. |
[12] |
CHANG Hao-xue1, CAI Xiao-bin2, CHEN Xiao-ling1, 3*, SUN Kun1. Response Characteristics Analysis of Different Vegetation Indices to Leaf Area Index of Rice[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 205-211. |
[13] |
WENG Hai-yong, CEN Hai-yan*, HE Yong. Hyperspectral Model Transfer for Citrus Canker Detection Based on Direct Standardization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 235-239. |
[14] |
LI Cui-ling1, 2, JIANG Kai1, 2, MA Wei1, 2, WANG Xiu1, 2*, MENG Zhi-jun1, 2, ZHAO Xue-guan1, 2, SONG Jian1, 2. Tomato Leaf Liriomyza Sativae Blanchard Pest Detection Based on Hyperspectral Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 253-257. |
[15] |
WANG Hong-bo1,2,HUANG Xiao-xian1,FANG Chen-yan1,2,ZHANG Teng-fei1,2,WEI Jun1. On-Orbit Spectral Calibration Method of Grating Dispersive Imaging Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 296-301. |
|
|
|
|