基于野外在线多角度光谱仪的荒漠草原植被光谱特征分析

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3170-10

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (12008 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The spectral reflection curve characteristics of vegetation are different from other substances, such as soil and water, and are closely related to the performance of their physiological traits. The actual angle causes errors in the coverage information obtained by the sensor due to the inconsistency of the incidence effect when looking down and sideways at the canopy vegetation. In this paper, we conducted a real-time multi-angle observation experiment of grassland vegetation in the desert grassland of Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia, by using a field online multi-angle spectrometer designed and assembled by ourselves. The four indices, namely the Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI), Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI), Optimized Soil Adjustment Vegetation Index (OSAVI) and Photochemical Vegetation Index (PRI), were used for multi-dimensional data comparison. We analyzed the correlation characteristics between the spectral diversity of grass physiological traits at different sensor observation angles (SVA) and solar altitude angles (SEA). It was found that the greater the sensor observation angle, the weaker the intra-day variability of canopy reflectance at different wavelengths, showing obvious variability in observation angles and differences in angular sensitivity, and the standard deviation of daily variability of vegetation reflectance was smaller when the sensor observation angle (SVA) was near 75° or observed vertically downward. The reflectance of vegetation was positively correlated with the solar altitude angle for a fixed sensor observation angle. Similarly, the angular effects of different vegetation indices also differed, with the OSAVI index being most sensitive at a sensor observation angle (SVA) of 45°, with the lowest value occurring in different months and the maximum value of the PRI index occurring below a sensor observation angle (SVA) of 60°. It was also found that selecting a certain sensor observation angle for different vegetation growth stages or for different solar altitude angles (SEA) is more beneficial to obtain valid and accurate data. The analysis results of data collected from the field online multi-angle spectrometer in this paper provide scientific data support for the correction of satellite image products, accurate monitoring of vegetation remote sensing, and accurate estimation of grassland biomass.

Key words：Multi-angle remote sensing;Vegetation index;Sun elevation angle

Received: 2022-03-24 Accepted: 2022-10-30

ZTFLH:

P407.1

Corresponding Authors: BAO Yu-long E-mail: baoyulong@imnu.edu.cn

Cite this article:

FU Xiao-man,BAO Yu-long,Bayaer Tubuxin, et al. Spectral Characteristics Analysis of Desert Steppe Vegetation Based on Field Online Multi-Angle Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3170-3179.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2023)10-3170-10 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2023/V43/I10/3170

[1] BAI Qing-kun, Alatengtuya（白庆坤，阿拉腾图雅）. Pratacultural Science（草业科学）, 2022, 39(3): 443.
[2] BAI Yong-fei, HUANG Jian-hui, ZHENG Shu-xia, et al（白永飞，黄建辉，郑淑霞，等）. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology（植物生态学报）, 2014, 38(2): 93.
[3] Bai Y, Wu J, Clark C M, et al. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49(6): 1204.
[4] Diner D J, Braswell B H, Davies R, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 97(4): 495.
[5] GAO Xin, HU Xiu-qing, FANG Wei, et al（高鑫，胡秀清，方伟, 等）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报）, 2022, 26(3): 505.
[6] WANG Ling-xiao, XIAO Peng-feng, FENG Xue-zhi（汪凌霄, 肖鹏峰, 冯学智）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报）, 2012, 16(5): 1035.
[7] YAN Guang-jian, JIANG Hai-lan, YAN Kai, et al（阎广建，姜海兰，闫凯，等）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报）, 2021, 25(1): 83.
[8] QIU Feng, HUO Jing-wen, ZHANG Qian, et al（邱凤，霍婧雯，张乾，等）. National Remote Sensing Bulletin（遥感学报）, 2021, 25(4): 1013.
[9] Grenzdörffer G J, Niemeyer F. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2011, 38-1(C22): 229.
[10] Burkart A, Aasen H, Alonso L, et al. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(1): 725.
[11] Middleton W, Mungall A. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1952, 42(8): 572.
[12] Sandmeier S, Sandmeier W, Itten K I, et al. 15th EARSeL Symposium, 1996: 55.
[13] Pegrum H, Fox N, Chapman M, et al. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2006: 1119.
[14] Coburn C A, Peddle D R, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 32(3): 244.
[15] Yan G, Ren H, Hu R, et al. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2012: 6916.
[16] YANG Shao-yuan, HUANG Wen-jiang, LIANG Dong（杨绍源，黄文江，梁栋）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2015, 35(7): 1956.
[17] Rouse J W, Jr., Haas R H, et al. NASA Special Publication, 1973: 309.
[18] Kanke Y, Tubaña B, Dalen M, et al. Precision Agriculture, 2016, 17(5): 507.
[19] Rondeaux G, Steven M, Baret F. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 55(2): 95.
[20] Gamon J A, Penuelas J, Field C B. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 41(1): 35.
[21] QIN Wen-han, XIANG Yue-qin（覃文汉，项月琴）. Remote Sensing of Environment China（环境遥感）, 1996, (4): 285.
[22] ZHANG Xue-hong, TIAN Qing-jiu, SHEN Run-ping（张雪红, 田庆久, 沈润平）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis（光谱学与光谱分析）, 2010, 30(6): 1600.