|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Analysis of Soluble Solids and Titratable Acidity Content in Angeleno Plum by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy With BP-ANN and PLS |
ZHAO Zhi-lei1, 2, 3, 4,WANG Xue-mei1, 2, 3,LIU Dong-dong1, 2, 3,WANG Yan-wei1, 2, 3,GU Yu-hong5,TENG Jia-xin1,NIU Xiao-ying1, 2, 3, 4* |
1. College of Quality and Technical Supervision, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
2. National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Metrology Instrument and System, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
3. Hebei Key Laboratory of Energy Metering and Safety Testing Technology, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
4. Institute of Geographical Indications,Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
5. College of Life Science, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071002, China
|
|
|
Abstract Soluble solid content (SSC) and titratable acidity (TA) are important indexes affecting the fruit quality and the fruit quality grading. Classical destructive detection methods are not suitable for fruit classification by quality. NIRS detection method is fast, easy to operate and can detect fruit quality without damage. In order to achieve non-destructive and rapid determination of SSC and TA in Angeleno plum fruits by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), diffuse reflectance spectra of plum fruits were collected by NIR spectrometer, SSC was measured by saccharometer, and TA content was determined by titration. Using leverage and F probability value to eliminate abnormal samples and software optimization combined with a manual screening of spectral bands, eliminating constant offset, subtracting a straight line, standard normal variate (SNV), max-minimum normalization, and multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), first and the second derivative combined smoothing, the first derivative combined minus a straight line and smoothing, and the first derivative combined with SNV or MSC correction. Partial least squares (PLS) and back propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN) were used to establish the quantitative models of SSC and TA of plum fruit. Results indicated that the best Band ranges of plum fruit SSC and TA are 4 000~8 852 and 4 605~6 523 cm-1 respectively. The best spectral preprocessing method of the PLS model of SSC was MSC correction. The best model correction correlation coefficient (Rc) was 0.914 4, the prediction correlation coefficient (Rp) was 0.878 5, the correction root means square error (RMSEC) was 0.91, and the prediction root means square error (RMSEP) was 1.00. After the first order differential combined with SNV and 9-point smoothing, the PLS model of TA was the best, and the Rc, Rp, RMSEC and RMSEP were 0.860 3, 0.819 6, 0.80 and 0.86. The principal components of SSC and TA spectral data of plum fruits were extracted, and the optimal BP-ANN quantitative analysis model of SSC and TA were established based on the first 10 principal component scores. The SSC BP-ANN model’s Rc, Rp, RMSEC and RMSEP were 0.976 7, 0.889 7, 0.75 and 0.99. The corresponding parameter values of the BP-ANN model of TA were 0.974 3, 0.897 7, 0.62 and 0.83, respectively. Compared with the quantitative model established by the PLS algorithm, the BP-ANN model has higher Rc and Rp and lower RMSEC and RMSEP than that of the PLS algorithm, so the quantitative analysis results from the BP-ANN model were better than that of the PLS algorithm for SSC and TA indicators.
|
Received: 2021-08-22
Accepted: 2022-03-17
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
NIU Xiao-ying
E-mail: 408643620@qq.com
|
|
[1] Lan Weijie,Jaillais B, Leca A, et al. Food Chemistry, 2020, 310: 125944.
[2] Wang J, Wang J, Chen Z,et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2017, 129: 143.
[3] Shah S, Zeb A, Qureshi W S,et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2021, 103639.
[4] Paloma Andrade Martins Nascimento,et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2016, 111: 345.
[5] QIANG Feng, WANG Qin-zhi, HE Jian-guo, et al(强 锋, 王芹志, 何建国, 等). Modern Food Science & Technology(现代食品科技), 2017, 212(4): 283.
[6] Cicooritti R, Paliotta M, Tiziana A,et al. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 257.
[7] JIANG Shui-quan, SUN Tong(江水泉, 孙 通). Food & Machinery(食品与机械), 2020, 36(2): 89.
[8] Maniwara P, Nakano K, Ohashi S,et al. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 257.
[9] Ar N H, Purwanto Y A,Budiastra I W et al. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 557(1): 9.
[10] WANG Dong, SUN Jun-peng, YU Shi-feng, et al(王 冬, 孙俊鹏, 于世锋, 等). Journal of Food Safety & Quality(食品安全质量检测学报), 2021, 12(18): 7222.
[11] Paz P, Sanchez Maria-Teresa, Pérez-Marín D, et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(8): 2565.
[12] Louw E D, Theron K I. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 58: 176.
[13] BAI Feng-hua, ZHANG Xiao-yu, WANG Yan-wei, et al(白凤华, 张晓瑜, 王艳伟, 等). Food Industry(食品工业), 2018, 39(6): 175.
[14] Workman J, Weyer J L. Practical Guide to Interpretive Near-Infrared Spectroscopy(近红外光谱解析实用指南). Translated by CHU Xiao-li,XU Yu-peng, TIAN Gao-you(褚小立, 许育鹏, 田高友, 译). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press(北京: 化学工业出版社), 2009. 19.
|
[1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
[2] |
LI Yu1, ZHANG Ke-can1, PENG Li-juan2*, ZHU Zheng-liang1, HE Liang1*. Simultaneous Detection of Glucose and Xylose in Tobacco by Using Partial Least Squares Assisted UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 103-110. |
[3] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[4] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[5] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
[6] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[7] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
[8] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[9] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
[10] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[11] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[12] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[13] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
[14] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
[15] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
|
|
|
|