|
|
|
|
|
|
Adaptability Analysis of Multiple Features Detection Algorithms Based on Fusion Degree Model Between Target and Environment |
DENG Xian-ming1, ZHANG Tian-cai1, 3, LIU Zeng-can1 , LI Zhong-sheng1, XIONG Jie1, ZHANG Yi-xiang1, LIU Peng-hao1, CEN Yi2*, WU Fa-lin1 |
1. The 59th Research Institute of China Ordnance Industry, Chongqing 400039, China
2. Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3. School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
|
|
|
Abstract Under the development trend of intelligent deformation, color change, temperature change, and spectrum change technology, low-feature targets accelerate the realization of feature fusion with the background of natural features, which makes the detection and evaluation of low-scattering, micro-reflection, and weak-radiation targets under complex natural backgrounds more and more difficult . Furthermore, the detection method, rapid decision-making and accurate evaluation of potential threat targets in certain situations have become difficult problems. This paper has proposed a parameter model for Fusion Degree(FD) between targets and background environments to improve the selection efficiency of multi-feature detection algorithms and the accuracy of the detection effect evaluation under the fusion scene of complex natural background environment with low-feature targets, such as discrete targets, camouflage targets, small targets, abnormal targets and so on. At the same time, simulated image data of 4 different spectral feature distribution scenes were designed, including vegetation camouflage targets embedded in the grass background, vegetation camouflage targets embedded in the soil background, vegetation and cement road camouflage targets embedded in the soil background, and vegetation, cement road, and soil camouflage targets embedded in the grass, cement road, and soil background respectively. Furthermore, signal noise ratio(SNR) of 200, 400 and 800 were applied to the spectral feature distribution scenes in which vegetation camouflage targets were embedded in the grass background. Through comprehensive Testal analysis of multiple factors such as spectrum information of targets, spectrum information of background, data noise ratio, etc., the research on threat evaluation of multi-feature detection algorithm was carried out, which was based on FD model between target and environment. Under the condition that the standard deviation is less than 0.08, the average values of FD parameters of the 9 classic multi-feature detection algorithms such as MtACE, MtAMF, MtCEM, SumACE, SumAMF, SumCEM, WtaACE, WtaAMF, and WtaCEM for the detection results of the 4 spectrum distribution scenes are 0.320 0, 0.350 2, 0.862 4, 0.365 8, 0.365 8, 0.846 1, 0.680 0, 0.680 0, 0.948 2, respectively. Meanwhile on the condition that the standard deviation is less than 0.07, the average values of FD parameters of the 9 classic multi-feature detection algorithms for detection results of 3 different levels of noise ratio data are 0.313 5, 0.320 9, 0.774 7, 0.369 6, 0.369 6, 0.847 5, 0.695 6, 0.695 6, 0.960 3, respectively. In this paper, through the analysis of detection and fusion evaluation tests under different spectrum distribution scenarios and different noise levels, the threat level ranking of multi-feature detection algorithms is realized, and the detection efficiency of multiple low-feature targets in complex scenarios is greatly improved. Considering spectrum and noise factors, for the detection of discretely distributed low-feature targets in complex scenes, the priority order of the 9 classic multi-feature detection algorithms is: MtACE>MtAMF>SumACE=SumAMF>>WtaACE=WtaAMF>MtCEM>SumCEM>WtaCEM.
|
Received: 2020-12-11
Accepted: 2021-09-11
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CEN Yi
E-mail: cenyi@radi.ac.cn
|
|
[1] ZHANG Bing, GAO Lian-ru(张 兵,高连如). Hyperspectral Image Classification and Target Detection(高光谱图像分类与目标探测). Beijing: Science Press(北京: 科学出版社),2011.
[2] Zhai Y, Zhang L, Wang N, et al. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Letter, 2016,13(8):1059.
[3] PU Rui-liang, GONG Peng(浦瑞良, 宫 鹏). Hyspectral Remote Sensing and Application(高光谱遥感及其应用). Beijing: Higher Education Press(北京:高等教育出版社), 2010.
[4] LI Na, ZHAO Hui-jie, JIA Guo-rui, et al(李 娜,赵慧洁,贾国瑞,等). Acta Electronica Sinica(电子学报), 2008, 28(8): 1480.
[5] ZHAO Chun-hui, LI Xiao-hui, WANG Yu-lei(赵春晖, 李晓慧, 王玉磊). Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument(电子测量与仪器学报), 2014, 8: 803.
[6] ZHOU Xin, LI Xiao-run(周 昕, 厉小润). Industrial Control Computer(工业控制计算机), 2015, 6: 42.
[7] Lo E, Ingram J. Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Minimum Generalized Variance Method. Proc SPIE, 2008, 6966: 696603.
[8] PENG Bo, ZHANG Li-fu, ZHANG Peng, et al(彭 波, 张立福, 张 鹏,等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2017,21(5): 739.
[9] Chang C I, Ren H, Hsueh M, et al. Proc SPIE, 2004, 5159: 339.
[10] Ren H, Du Q, Chang C I, et al. Comparison Between Constrained Energy Minimization Based Approaches for Hyperspectral Imagery. IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003, doi: 10.1109/WARSD.2003.1295199.
[11] YIN Ji-hao, WANG Yan, WANG Yi-song(尹继豪,王 艳,王义松). Acta Electronic Sinica(电子学报), 2010, 38(9): 1975.
[12] Chang C I. Hyperspectral Data Processing: Algorithm Design and Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[13] DENG Xian-ming, MIAO Fang, ZHAI Yong-guang, et al(邓贤明,苗 放,翟涌光, 等). Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni(中山大学学报·自然科学版), 2017, 56(1):151.
[14] Herweg J A, Kerekes J P, Weatherbee O, et al. Proc SPIE, 2012, 8390: 839028.
|
[1] |
CHENG Jia-wei1, 2,LIU Xin-xing1, 2*,ZHANG Juan1, 2. Application of Infrared Spectroscopy in Exploration of Mineral Deposits: A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 15-21. |
[2] |
ZHU Yu-chen1, 2, WANG Yan-cang3, 4, 5, LI Xiao-fang6, LIU Xing-yu3, GU Xiao-he4*, ZHAO Qi-chao3, 4, 5. Study on Quantitative Inversion of Leaf Water Content of Winter Wheat Based on Discrete Wavelet Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2902-2909. |
[3] |
LIANG Wen-ke, WEI Guang-fen, WANG Ming-hao. Research on Methane Detection Error Caused by Lorentzian Profile Approximation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1683-1689. |
[4] |
WANG Ren-jie1, 2, FENG Peng1*, YANG Xing3, AN Le3, HUANG Pan1, LUO Yan1, HE Peng1, TANG Bin1, 2*. A Denoising Algorithm for Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrum Based on
CEEMDAN and Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 976-983. |
[5] |
YAN Jing-tao1, MIAO Li-jun1*, MAO Jian-feng2, SHI Jin1, HUANG Teng-chao1, CHE Shuang-liang1, SHU Xiao-wu1. Laser Spectrum Broadening Method Based on Phase Modulation of Gaussian White Noise[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 665-671. |
[6] |
YU Yang1, ZHANG Zhao-hui1, 2*, ZHAO Xiao-yan1, ZHANG Tian-yao1. Study on Extraction Method of Terahertz Spectral Parameters of Rough Surface Samples[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 386-391. |
[7] |
XI Liang1,2, SI Fu-qi1*, JIANG Yu1, ZHOU Hai-jin1, QIU Xiao-han1, CHANG Zhen1. Ground-Based IDOAS De-Striping by Weighted Unidirectional Variation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 627-633. |
[8] |
YAN Xiao-xu1, YUE Su-wei1, 2*, SU Lü-man1, WANG Zhi-wen1. Gemological and Spectroscopic Characteristics of Natural White Sodalite With Tenebrescence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3936-3941. |
[9] |
DAI Jing-jing1, ZHAO Long-xian2, WANG Hai-yu2. Thermal-Infrared Spectroscopy of Garnet Minerals[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1764-1768. |
[10] |
WAN Liu-jie1, 2, ZHEN Chao3, QIU Zong-jia1, LI Kang1, MA Feng-xiang3, HAN Dong1, 2, ZHANG Guo-qiang1, 2*. Research of High Precision Photoacoustic Second Harmonic Detection Technology Based on FFT Filter[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 2996-3001. |
[11] |
HU Yin, WANG Min-chang, PAN Qing, NING Yan-li, KANG Ying, WANG Ming, LUAN Jie-yu, CHEN Zhi-qun. Spectroscopic Analysis of Endo and Exo-Tetrahydrodicyclopentadiene[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 3161-3166. |
[12] |
WANG Jing-jing1, 2, DONG Yang2, TIAN Xing2, CHEN Jia-jin2, TAN Tu2, ZHU Gong-dong2, MEI Jiao-xu2, GAO Xiao-ming1, 2*. Application of White Noise Perturbation in Wavelength Modulated Off-Axis Integrated Cavity Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2657-2663. |
[13] |
QI Xiang-yu1, 2, CHEN Chao2*, QU Yi1, 3*, ZHANG Xing2, CHEN Yong-yi2, WANG Biao2, LIANG Lei2, JIA Peng2, QIN Li2, NING Yong-qiang2, WANG Li-jun2. Complete Frequency Domain Analysis for Linewidth of Narrow Linewidth Lasers[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(08): 2354-2359. |
[14] |
WANG Zi-ru1, LIU Ming-hui2, LIU En-kai1, DONG Zuo-ren2, CAI Sheng-wen1, YIN Lei1, LIU Feng1. Method and Application for Raman Spectra SNR Evaluation Based on Extreme Points Statistics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1080-1085. |
[15] |
BAI Tie-cheng1,2, WANG Tao2, CHEN You-qi3, MERCATORIS Benoît1*. Comparison of Near-Infrared Spectrum Pretreatment Methods for Jujube Leaf Moisture Content Detection in the Sand and Dust area of Southern Xinjiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1323-1328. |
|
|
|
|