|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on Quantitative Inversion of Leaf Water Content of Winter Wheat Based on Discrete Wavelet Technique |
ZHU Yu-chen1, 2, WANG Yan-cang3, 4, 5, LI Xiao-fang6, LIU Xing-yu3, GU Xiao-he4*, ZHAO Qi-chao3, 4, 5 |
1. Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
2. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Cycling and Eco-Geological Processes, Xiamen 361000, China
3. North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering,Langfang 065000, China
4. Information Technology Research Center,Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
5. Aerospace Remote Sensing Information Processing and Application Collaborative Innovation Center of Hebei Province,Langfang 065000, China
6. Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China
|
|
|
Abstract Due to the influence of the field environment, winter wheat canopy spectra collected in the field contain a large amount of noise unrelated to the target information, which limits the ability of hyperspectral data to estimate the information of winter wheat plants. In order to limit the influence of noise information on spectral information and explore the methods to improve the estimation ability of spectral information on the water supply of winter wheat plants, this study obtained the hyperspectral data of winter wheat and its leaf water content information through field experiments, processed and analyzed the hyperspectral data by discrete wavelet algorithm, combined with correlation analysis algorithm and partial least squares algorithm, and quantitatively analyzed the influence of five types of wavelet bases on the discrete wavelet algorithm to separate The results show that: (1) the discrete wavelet algorithm can be used to separate the available spectral information from noise, and (2) the wavelet bases can be used to separate the available spectral information from noise, to provide theoretical and methodological support for the processing and analysis of the spectral data in the field. The results show that (1) the sensitive bands are mostly distributed in D1—D5 scales, and the distribution intervals of sensitive bands are relatively consistent among wavelet bases. However, there are some differences in band positions and correlation strengths, which indicates that the choice of wavelet bases can influence the correlation strengths and band positions of high-frequency information and winter wheat leaf water content. (2) The available spectral information and noise information both show a pattern of increasing and then decreasing with the increase of decomposition scale. The interference strength of noise information on the estimation ability of high-frequency information decreases with the increase of scale, and the estimation ability of high-frequency information on the water content of winter wheat leaves decreases with the increase of scale. (3) The accuracy and stability of the model are the results of the combined effect of available spectral information and noise information, in which the estimation model constructed based on the D5 scale of Meyer wavelet basis is the optimal model with R2=0.625 and RMSE=1.562 for modeling accuracy and R2=0.767 and RMSE=1.828 for validation accuracy. Spectral processing and analysis, and provide some reference for the processing and analysis of spectral information that is heavily influenced by noise, and also provide basic support for the detection of the water content of crop leaves within regions with high annual water vapor content, such as southwest and south China, or in the north in summer.
|
Received: 2022-05-17
Accepted: 2022-11-22
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GU Xiao-he
E-mail: guxh@nercita.org.cn
|
|
[1] Chen J, Zhao C, Jones G, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 2022, 6: 1.
[2] Pervez M S, Budde M, Rowland J. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 149: 155.
[3] Chen Y, Lu D, Luo L, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 204: 197.
[4] Verrelst J, Camps-Valls G, Munoz-Mari J, et al. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 2015, 108(Oct.): 273.
[5] Wang J H, Zhao C J, Huang W J, et al. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2001, (4): 42.
[6] Gerber F, Marion R, Olioso A, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(2): 404.
[7] Casas A, RiaO D, Ustin S L, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 148: 28.
[8] Liu L,Zhang S,Zhang B. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 37(14): 3384.
[9] JIN Ning, ZHANG Dong-yan, LI Zhen-hai, et al(靳 宁, 张东彦, 李振海, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2020, 51(11): 243.
[10] Pasqualottoa N,Delegidoa J,Wittenberghea S,et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018, 67: 69.
[11] Zhang F, Zhou G. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(11): 15203.
[12] CHEN Xiu-qing, YANG Qi, HAN Jing-ye, et al(陈秀青, 杨 琦, 韩景晔, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(3): 891.
[13] LI Chen, WANG Yan-cang, LI Xu-qing, et al(李 辰, 王延仓, 李旭青, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2021, 52(3): 193.
[14] LI Chen, WANG Yan-cang, LI Xu-qing, et al(李 辰,王延仓,李旭青,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报),2021,52(3):193.
[15] Gu X, Wang Y, Sun Q, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 167: 105053.
[16] MA Chun-yan, WANG Yi-lin, ZHAI Li-ting, et al(马春艳, 王艺琳, 翟丽婷, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报),2022, 53(5): 1.
[17] LI Chang-chun, LI Ya-cong, WANG Yi-lin, et al(李长春, 李亚聪, 王艺琳, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2021, 52(12): 191.
|
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|