|
|
|
|
|
|
Detection of Crop Chlorophyll Content Based on Spectrum Extraction from Coating Imaging Sensor |
LONG Yao-wei, SUN Hong, GAO De-hua, ZHENG Zhi-yong, LI Min-zan*, YANG Wei |
Key Laboratory of Modern Precision Agriculture System Integration Research, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to quickly analyze the growth of the crop in the field, the spectral imaging sensor was used to detect the chlorophyll content of the maize canopy. The images of 47 maize plants were photographed using an IMEC 5×5 imaging unit multispectral camera. The camera was designed based on the coating principle to obtain spectral images of 25 wavelengths in the range of 673~951 nm. At the same time, the chlorophyll content was measured by SPAD-520 device. There were 2~3 sampling points in each leaf, and they were measured 3 times at each point, so that 251 sample data were collected. The multi-spectral images were processed. Firstly, the gray pixel values of the same band in the imaging unit were extracted based on the principle of the coating spectral imaging sensor. The extraction methods included image splitting and recombination, in which 25 images were extracted from the original image. Secondly, a linear inversion formula between the gray value of multi-spectral images and the gray plate standard reflectance was established. The gray plate standard was made up of 4 gray level standard plates. Thirdly, the image segmentation algorithm was established to reduce the background influence in maize canopy images, in which the OTSU algorithm was used to eliminate the interference of the soil and the Hough circle transform algorithm was used to eliminate the interference of the flowerpot. Lastly, the study used the Mahala Nobis distance algorithm to eliminate abnormal sample data. According to the proportion of 2∶1, the total samples were divided into calibration set (170 samples) and validation set (73 samples) by SPXY (Sample set partitioning based on joint X-Y distance) algorithm. The partial least squares regression (PLSR) model was established to detect the chlorophyll content of the maize canopy. In general, the results of spectral bands reflectance linear calibration fitting model were above 0.99. The corrected data was consistent with the ASD spectral reflectance before calibration. The interference of soil and flowerpot background noise in the multi-spectral images were removed by the image segmentation algorithm. The calibration accuracy of PLSR model was 0.545 1, and the validation accuracy was 0.472 6. And then the chlorophyll content of each pixel in the maize canopy images could be calculated by the PLSR modeling result. As a result, the chlorophyll content distribution could be visually analyzed and indicated the growth status. The study could provide technical and application support for the chlorophyll distribution of field maize plants.
|
Received: 2019-04-12
Accepted: 2019-08-26
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Min-zan
E-mail: limz@cau.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Li Dan, Wang Chong-yang. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 154: 176.
[2] Diego InácioPatrício. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 153(10): 69.
[3] Leucker M, Wahabzada M, Steiner U, et al. Functional Plant Biology, 2017, 44: 1.
[4] Ge Y, Bai G, Stoerger V, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 127: 625.
[5] Amigo J M, Babamoradi H, Elcoroaristizabal S. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2015, 896: 34.
[6] ZHENG Tao, LIU Ning, SUN Hong, et al(郑 涛, 刘 宁, 孙 红, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2017, 48(S1): 153.
[7] XU Bao-ding, QIN Yu-hua, YANG Ning, et al(徐宝鼎, 秦玉华, 杨 宁, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(3): 717.
[8] ZOU Xiao-bo, ZHANG Xiao-lei, SHI Ji-yong, et al(邹小波, 张小磊, 石吉勇, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2014, 30(13): 169.
[9] Xiaobo Z, Jiewen Z, Holmes M, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2010, 104: 265.
[10] Puneet Mishra, Mohd Shahrimie, Mohd Asaari, et al. Biosystems Engineering, 2017, 164: 49.
[11] Datasheet_LQ_201CL[R], 2018(03).
[12] https://www.ximea.com/en/usb3-vision-camera/hyperspectral-usb3-cameras-mini[R], 2018(03).
[13] Vigneau N, Ecarnot M, Rabatel G, et al. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122: 25. |
[1] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[2] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[3] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[4] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[5] |
WANG Wen-song1, PEI Chen-xi2, YANG Bin1*, WANG Zhi-xin2, QIANG Ke-jie2, WANG Ying1. Flame Temperature and Emissivity Distribution Measurement MethodBased on Multispectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3644-3652. |
[6] |
DONG Jian-jiang1, TIAN Ye1, ZHANG Jian-xing2, LUAN Zhen-dong2*, DU Zeng-feng2*. Research on the Classification Method of Benthic Fauna Based on
Hyperspectral Data and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3015-3022. |
[7] |
JIANG Chun-xu1, 2, TAN Yong1*, XU Rong3, LIU De-long4, ZHU Rui-han1, QU Guan-nan1, WANG Gong-chang3, LÜ Zhong1, SHAO Ming5, CHENG Xiang-zheng5, ZHOU Jian-wei1, SHI Jing1, CAI Hong-xing1. Research on Inverse Recognition of Space Target Scattering Spectral
Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3023-3030. |
[8] |
WEI Zi-kai, WANG Jie, ZHANG Ruo-yu, ZHANG Meng-yun*. Classification of Foreign Matter in Cotton Using Line Scan Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3230-3238. |
[9] |
SUN Bang-yong1, YU Meng-ying1, YAO Qi2*. Research on Spectral Reconstruction Method From RGB Imaging Based on Dual Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2687-2693. |
[10] |
MAO Yi-lin1, LI He1, WANG Yu1, FAN Kai1, SUN Li-tao2, WANG Hui3, SONG Da-peng3, SHEN Jia-zhi2*, DING Zhao-tang1, 2*. Quantitative Judgment of Freezing Injury of Tea Leaves Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2266-2271. |
[11] |
LIU Gang1, LÜ Jia-ming1, NIU Wen-xing1, LI Qi-feng2, ZHANG Ying-hu2, YANG Yun-peng2, MA Xiang-yun2*. Detection of Sulfur Content in Vessel Fuel Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1697-1702. |
[12] |
LI Bin, HAN Zhao-yang, WANG Qiu, SUN Zhao-xiang, LIU Yan-de*. Research on Bruise Level Detection of Loquat Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1792-1799. |
[13] |
HU Hui-qiang1, WEI Yun-peng1, XU Hua-xing1, ZHANG Lei2, MAO Xiao-bo1*, ZHAO Yun-ping2*. Identification of the Age of Puerariae Thomsonii Radix Based on Hyperspectral Imaging and Principal Component Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1953-1960. |
[14] |
LIU Mei-jun, TIAN Ning*, YU Ji*. Spectral Study on Mouse Oocyte Quality[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1376-1380. |
[15] |
DU Guo-jun, ZHANG Yu-gui, CUI Bo-lun, JIANG Cheng, OU Zong-yao. Spectral Calibration of Hyperspectral Monitor (HSM) on Carbonsat[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1556-1562. |
|
|
|
|