基于目标与环境FD模型的多特征检测算法适应性评估

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)04-1285-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6777 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Under the development trend of intelligent deformation, color change, temperature change, and spectrum change technology, low-feature targets accelerate the realization of feature fusion with the background of natural features, which makes the detection and evaluation of low-scattering, micro-reflection, and weak-radiation targets under complex natural backgrounds more and more difficult . Furthermore, the detection method, rapid decision-making and accurate evaluation of potential threat targets in certain situations have become difficult problems. This paper has proposed a parameter model for Fusion Degree(FD) between targets and background environments to improve the selection efficiency of multi-feature detection algorithms and the accuracy of the detection effect evaluation under the fusion scene of complex natural background environment with low-feature targets, such as discrete targets, camouflage targets, small targets, abnormal targets and so on. At the same time, simulated image data of 4 different spectral feature distribution scenes were designed, including vegetation camouflage targets embedded in the grass background, vegetation camouflage targets embedded in the soil background, vegetation and cement road camouflage targets embedded in the soil background, and vegetation, cement road, and soil camouflage targets embedded in the grass, cement road, and soil background respectively. Furthermore, signal noise ratio(SNR) of 200, 400 and 800 were applied to the spectral feature distribution scenes in which vegetation camouflage targets were embedded in the grass background. Through comprehensive Testal analysis of multiple factors such as spectrum information of targets, spectrum information of background, data noise ratio, etc., the research on threat evaluation of multi-feature detection algorithm was carried out, which was based on FD model between target and environment. Under the condition that the standard deviation is less than 0.08, the average values of FD parameters of the 9 classic multi-feature detection algorithms such as MtACE, MtAMF, MtCEM, SumACE, SumAMF, SumCEM, WtaACE, WtaAMF, and WtaCEM for the detection results of the 4 spectrum distribution scenes are 0.320 0, 0.350 2, 0.862 4, 0.365 8, 0.365 8, 0.846 1, 0.680 0, 0.680 0, 0.948 2, respectively. Meanwhile on the condition that the standard deviation is less than 0.07, the average values of FD parameters of the 9 classic multi-feature detection algorithms for detection results of 3 different levels of noise ratio data are 0.313 5, 0.320 9, 0.774 7, 0.369 6, 0.369 6, 0.847 5, 0.695 6, 0.695 6, 0.960 3, respectively. In this paper, through the analysis of detection and fusion evaluation tests under different spectrum distribution scenarios and different noise levels, the threat level ranking of multi-feature detection algorithms is realized, and the detection efficiency of multiple low-feature targets in complex scenarios is greatly improved. Considering spectrum and noise factors, for the detection of discretely distributed low-feature targets in complex scenes, the priority order of the 9 classic multi-feature detection algorithms is: MtACE>MtAMF>SumACE=SumAMF>>WtaACE=WtaAMF>MtCEM>SumCEM>WtaCEM.

Key words：Spectrum; Noise; Naural environment; Features detection; Fusion degree; Adaptability of algorithm

Received: 2020-12-11 Accepted: 2021-09-11

ZTFLH:

TP79

Corresponding Authors: CEN Yi E-mail: cenyi@radi.ac.cn

Cite this article:

DENG Xian-ming,ZHANG Tian-cai,LIU Zeng-can, et al. Adaptability Analysis of Multiple Features Detection Algorithms Based on Fusion Degree Model Between Target and Environment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1285-1292.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)04-1285-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I04/1285

[1] ZHANG Bing, GAO Lian-ru(张兵，高连如). Hyperspectral Image Classification and Target Detection(高光谱图像分类与目标探测). Beijing: Science Press(北京: 科学出版社)，2011.
[2] Zhai Y, Zhang L, Wang N, et al. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Letter, 2016，13(8)：1059.
[3] PU Rui-liang, GONG Peng(浦瑞良, 宫鹏). Hyspectral Remote Sensing and Application(高光谱遥感及其应用). Beijing: Higher Education Press(北京：高等教育出版社), 2010.
[4] LI Na, ZHAO Hui-jie, JIA Guo-rui, et al(李娜，赵慧洁，贾国瑞，等). Acta Electronica Sinica(电子学报), 2008, 28(8): 1480.
[5] ZHAO Chun-hui, LI Xiao-hui, WANG Yu-lei(赵春晖, 李晓慧, 王玉磊). Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument(电子测量与仪器学报), 2014, 8: 803.
[6] ZHOU Xin, LI Xiao-run(周昕, 厉小润). Industrial Control Computer(工业控制计算机), 2015, 6: 42.
[7] Lo E, Ingram J. Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Minimum Generalized Variance Method. Proc SPIE, 2008, 6966: 696603.
[8] PENG Bo, ZHANG Li-fu, ZHANG Peng, et al(彭波, 张立福, 张鹏，等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2017，21(5): 739.
[9] Chang C I, Ren H, Hsueh M, et al. Proc SPIE, 2004, 5159: 339.
[10] Ren H, Du Q, Chang C I, et al. Comparison Between Constrained Energy Minimization Based Approaches for Hyperspectral Imagery. IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003, doi: 10.1109/WARSD.2003.1295199.
[11] YIN Ji-hao, WANG Yan, WANG Yi-song(尹继豪，王艳，王义松). Acta Electronic Sinica(电子学报), 2010, 38(9): 1975.
[12] Chang C I. Hyperspectral Data Processing: Algorithm Design and Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[13] DENG Xian-ming, MIAO Fang, ZHAI Yong-guang, et al(邓贤明，苗放，翟涌光, 等). Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni(中山大学学报·自然科学版), 2017, 56(1)：151.
[14] Herweg J A, Kerekes J P, Weatherbee O, et al. Proc SPIE, 2012, 8390: 839028.