|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramie Variety Identification Based on the Hyperspectral Parameters and the Stepwise Discriminant Analysis |
CAO Xiao-lan1, 2, CHEN Xing-ming2, ZHANG Shuai2, CUI Guo-xian1* |
1. Ramie Research Institute of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2. College of Information Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China |
|
|
Abstract The hyperspectral data on total 927 leaves of different genotypes, which come from 4 ramie varieties, were collected under the field cultivation conditions to explore the identification and classification of ramie varieties with the hyperspectral as the basis. According to the hyperspectral reflection curve of ramie leaves, two groups of feature parameters were extracted, namely, the hyperspectral wave-valley reflectance and position parameters(the group V1) as well as the skewness and kurtosis parameters(the group V2) . Then, by adopting the stepwise discriminant approach to screen different number of variables under different F-value settings, multiple Fisher linear discriminant functions based on these two groups of feature parameters were created respectively, and further, the created discriminant functions were comparatively analyzed from the computational complexity, the accuracy and the stability. So, we can come to the following conclusions: (1) For discriminant functions under all the combinations, the overall average accuracy was 91.1% and the overall standard deviation mean was 1.2%; (2) From the comprehensive trade-off perspective, when the number of variables was between 8 and 14, the discriminant effect of the group V2 was the best among all the combinations, namely, the computational complexity was in the middle level, and both the accuracy and the stability were over their corresponding average values; among them, the discriminant functions with 13 variables had the highest average accuracy and the lowest standard deviation, which were 94.2% and 0% respectively; (3) When the accuracy was considered preferentially and the number of variables changed between 15 and 22, the group V1 had the highest accuracy which was 95.5%, however, the computational complexity under this case was higher, the stability was in the middle level and the lowest standard deviation was 0.9%. Above results showed that it was feasible to utilize the hyperspectral parameters together with the stepwise discriminant approach.
|
Received: 2017-04-23
Accepted: 2017-10-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CUI Guo-xian
E-mail: gx-cui@163.com
|
|
[1] LI Jun(李 军). Agricultural Information Technology(农业信息技术). Beijing: Science Press(北京: 科学出版社),2015. 98.
[2] LIU Yao, TAN Ke-zhu, CHEN Yue-hua, et al(刘 瑶,谭克竹, 陈月华,等). Soybean Science(大豆科学),2016,35(4): 671.
[3] ZANG Zhuo, LIN Hui, YANG Min-hua(臧 卓, 林 辉, 杨敏华). Science of Surveying and Mapping(测绘科学),2014,39(2): 146.
[4] SHI Fei-fei, GAO Xiao-hong, YANG Ling-yu, et al(史飞飞, 高小红, 杨灵玉,等). Geography and Geo-Information Science(地理与地理信息科学),2016,32(2): 32.
[5] WANG Dong, WU Jian(王 岽, 吴 见). Geography and Geo-Information Science(地理与地理信息科学),2015,31(2): 29.
[6] CHAI Ying, RUAN Ren-zong, CHAI Guo-wu,et al(柴 颖, 阮仁宗, 柴国武,等). Remote Sensing for Land and Resource(国土资源遥感),2016,28(3): 86.
[7] SU Jian-guang, DAI Zhi-gang(粟建光, 戴志刚). Chinese Hemp Plant Germplasm Resources and Their Main Characters(中国麻类作物种质资源及其主要性状). Beijing: China Agricultural Press(北京: 中国农业出版社),2016. 9.
[8] JIA Jun-ping(贾俊平). Fundamental Statistic(统计学基础). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press(北京: 中国人民大学出版社),2013. 89, 90.
[9] LU Wen-dai, ZHU Hong-bing(卢纹岱,朱红兵). SPSS Statistical Analysis(SPSS统计分析). Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Indeustry(北京: 电子工业出版社),2015,4: 493. |
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|