光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of Hard Rate of Licorice(Glycyrrhiza uralensis F.)Seeds Using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy |
SUN Qun1,LI Xin1,LI Hang1,WU Ke1,LI Jun-hui2,WANG Jian-hua1,SUN Bao-qi1* |
1.Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Genetic Improvement of Ministry of Agriculture/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100193, China 2.College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China |
|
|
Abstract With 112 licorice seed samples with different hard rates ranging from 0.3% to 99.3%, harvested in different years from 2002 to 2007 and from different locations of China including Xinjiang municipality, Ningxia province, Inner-Mongolia municipality, Gansu province, Shanxi province and Heilongjiang province, a model for determining hard rate of licorice seeds was tried to be built by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy with quantitative partial least squares (QPLS).All the seeds samples were divided into two groups: calibration set (including 84 samples) and validation set (including 28 samples).The influences of different spectral regions, different main components and different calibration samples on the prediction results were compared.The result indicated that the spectral regions of 4 000-8 000, 5 000-9 000, 5 000-8 000, 5 000-7 000 and 5 000-6 000 cm-1 all had satisfied and similar prediction results, then 5 000-6 000 cm-1 was regarded as the optimum spectral region for building the model because of its faster operation speed.The model with 6 main components had better relative high determination coefficient (R2) and low standard errors and absolute errors.With the spectral range from 5 000 to 6 000 cm-1 and 6 main components, there was a better fitting between the predictive value and true value.Determination coefficients(R2)of calibration and validation sets are 90.23% and 91.24%, the coefficients of correlation are 0.953 2 and 0.957 9, the standard errors are 10.31 and 9.72, and the average absolute errors are 8.01% and 7.45% respectively.Even with different calibration samples, the models have high determination coefficient (R2 over 90%), low standard errors (about 10.00) and low absolute errors (about 7.90%).The building of NIR model for determining hard rate of licorice seeds could promote the application of hard seeds in cultivation.
|
Received: 2009-02-06
Accepted: 2009-05-08
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SUN Bao-qi
|
|
[1] XU Ben-mei, SHI Xiao-hua(徐本美, 史晓华).Chinese Bulletin of Botany(植物学通报), 1997, 14(2): 45. [2] CAO Bang-hua, ZHAI Ming-pu, GUO Jun-jie(曹帮华, 翟明普, 郭俊杰).Scientia Silvae Sinica(林业科学), 2005, 41(2): 42. [3] TIAN Juan, SUN Qun, WANG Jian-hua, et al(田 娟, 孙 群, 王建华, 等).Plant Physiology Communications(植物生理学通讯), 2007, 43(2): 235. [4] WANG Jin-long(王金龙).Soybean Science(大豆科学), 1999, 18(4): 351. [5] YANG Qi-he, YIN Xiao-juan, YE Wan-hui(杨期和, 尹小娟, 叶万辉).Chinese Bulletin of Botany(植物学通报),2006, 23(1): 108. [6] SUN Qun, TONG Han-wen, WU Bo, et al(孙 群, 佟汉文, 吴 波, 等).Journal of Plant Genetic Resources(植物遗传资源学报), 2007, 8(1): 56. [7] SUN Jun-ming, HAN Fen-xia, YAN Shu-rong, et al(孙君明, 韩粉霞, 闫淑荣, 等).Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2008, 28(6): 1290. [8] KANG Yue-qiong, HAO Feng(康月琼, 郝 风).Seeds(种子), 2004, 23(7): 10. [9] HAN Liang-liang, MAO Pei-sheng, WANG Xin-guo, et al(韩亮亮,毛培胜,王新国,等).Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2008, 27: 86. [10] Tigabu M, Ode’n P C.Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2002, 10: 45. [11] Tigabu M, Ode’n P C.New Forests, 2003, 25: 163. [12] Tigabu M, Ode’n PC.Seed Science and Technology, 2004, 32: 593. [13] Tigabu M, Ode’n P C, Shen T Y.Canada Journal of Forest Resources, 2004, 34: 76. [14] Tigabu M, Fjellstrom J, Ode’n P C.New Forests, 2007, 33: 155. [15] Lestander T A, Ode’n P C.Seed Science and Technology, 2002, 30: 383. [16] YAN Qi-chuan(颜启传).Seeds Science(种子学).Beijing: China Agriculture Press(北京: 中国农业出版社),2000.
|
[1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
[2] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[3] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[4] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
[5] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[6] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
[7] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[8] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
[9] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[10] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[11] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[12] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
[13] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
[14] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
[15] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
|
|
|
|